Ray H
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Falling Waters, WV
Just about everyone who has supported the cop in the video has interjected their reasons for supporting him that are not in evidence in the video.
ie: The cop may have had a bad day, the cyclist may have done something to provoke him, the cops may have tried to stop him earlier, there is a background of trouble at the event, the cop or cyclist may have said something that you cant hear, ect.
But those who support the cyclist are accused of assuming things??? I just look at the video and come to a conclusion based on what I see. If it isnt right, so be it, its all Ive got.
What I see in the video is a cyclist riding along and a cop forcing him to the curb and pushing him off his bike. Is everyone watching the same video I am? Because some of you seem to be seeing more. The video doesnt show a reason for the act, you guys are just making up reasons because you support the cop so you need a valid reason for knocking someone off a bike.
ie: The cop may have had a bad day, the cyclist may have done something to provoke him, the cops may have tried to stop him earlier, there is a background of trouble at the event, the cop or cyclist may have said something that you cant hear, ect.
But those who support the cyclist are accused of assuming things??? I just look at the video and come to a conclusion based on what I see. If it isnt right, so be it, its all Ive got.
What I see in the video is a cyclist riding along and a cop forcing him to the curb and pushing him off his bike. Is everyone watching the same video I am? Because some of you seem to be seeing more. The video doesnt show a reason for the act, you guys are just making up reasons because you support the cop so you need a valid reason for knocking someone off a bike.