SBrad001 said:
Trust me, I hold a special place for each of those f**ktards, but I think the vast majority of blame lies at the Bush Administration for using faulty intel that they knew was faulty.
I believe 100% that Bush and his cronies were simply looking for an excuse to invade Iraq.
You really have to expand your view, look at a map and see where the US is deployed. It's almost a perfect circle around Iran.
Would you expect a military commander to share his planning with the media` Would you expect an administration to signal it's true intent, in the media.
Misinformation has always been a part of war. Political or military.
You can almost bet, no matter who becomes president, the pressure on Iran will continue.
Iran is a Fascist regime on the march. Their agenda has morphed some country to country but the goals remain the same. An Islamic world.
We had more of a legitimate reason to invade Iraq than we did to bomb Serbia. First off, Serbia was a civil war and a European problem, in no way an American problem. Clinton hoped to curry favor with the Saudis and get them to pay for the expired ammo they used to fight the war.
IMO we had more of a legitimate reason to be in Iraq than Viet Nam or Serbia.
IMO Saddam would have been a fool if he didn't stockpile chemical weapons. The whole story has yet to be told. How hard would it be to hide a dozen containers in a country the size of Iraq. Heck they haven't found Fosset or his plane yet in an area a whole lot smaller and likely above ground someplace.
More likely the chemical weapons were destroyed and it was hushed up. I can think of many reasons for this. There is still a lot of stuff yet to be revealed about this war or even the Vietnam war.