scottmcneal
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- not here
thanks, not sure about this high tech crap with oil...i just change mine an drive, what can i say
scottmcneal said:thanks, not sure about this high tech crap with oil...i just change mine an drive, what can i say
bewilderedbeast said:I posted in another thread that I wonder if people are too doom and gloom about the new oils and lower phosphorous and zinc. I've seen several oil analyses from 4.0's using newer SM oils and they all looked pretty good, no signs elevated wear metals or signs of anything weird going on.
Nine Mile said:Really? That would be some very good news to me....because it looks from this thread that if you can't run synth or fins NOS oil, you are SOL.
x2. I don't think it would have made any difference without the slick 50 junk.RichP said:I attribute that more to the crank splashing oil up than slick 50....
RyanM said:700ppm of zinc sounds low. Of course the affects are long term. But what do I know.
Looks like a 500% increase in the Moly (Mo) there!bewilderedbeast said:Here are results from two of my UOA's, the lefthand figures are Havoline SM 10W30, the righthand ones are Chevron SL High mileage.
You can see which one looks better, and if you see anything that looks like excessive or catastrophic wear, please tell me.
As I said, there are many others with the same engine and a variety of oil brands, the newer SM's are looking just as good or better.
.......Mo 313 60......
Phos 550 624
Zn 650 759.....