mikedashg
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- San Diego, CA
obviously most people aren't doing that.
Totally with you. Most people aren't. But you might be surprised at the amount who are. I'm one of em for sure.
IT guys are switching because it's easier to support a multi-os environment on a Mac. Running multiple OSs at the same time too. You can natively interface with unix machines, windows, and of course the Macs on the network much easier.
My FAVORITE part of the Apple phenomenom is that they had to go to Unix to get an operating system worth a crap and they had to go to Intel to get a real chip.
Yeah, anything less then OS X was a pile of $#!+. That was pre-unix days. I was a PC person in those days, and for good reason. Macs were awful. They crashed worse then PCs did. And you couldn't really run more then a couple programs at once. But you were better off with one at a time. I hate meeting die hard Mac fans that say to me "Oh, I've been on Macs since OS 6" I usually say "I'm sorry" and walk away. haha. Those people are just diluted Mac fanatics. I like Macs for a reason, they run OS X. I'm not really a Mac person, I'm an OS X person.
As far as the chip goes. The G series chips were made by Motorola, and they couldn't give Apple what they wanted (and what consumers were asking for), so they looked elsewhere. Intel had a huge market in the processor chip business. Being a much bigger processor chip giant then Motorola, they could afford to come out with faster, cooler running chips. They even push Intel now to make smaller, faster, cooler chips. Look at the MacBook air. It's only that thin for a reason. Apple went to Intel and said "we want this processor, but it's too big, so make it smaller" so they did.
thats 5 programs that are near impossible to run on a mac without supporting software. i could come up with more if you'd like.
where as my 4ish year old gateway base laptop that cost me 600 bux can run then with no problems.
and i have used solidworks on a macbook pro...and my gateway is faster. so do the cost comparison there. there isnt any. a 2k laptop vs a 600 laptop doing the exact same thing. i had this discussion with a kid in my mfg class. he basically swore by macs and said his macbook pro would out perform any comp on the market. well my 600 gateway shut him up really fast. the macbook was slow and glitchy and it didn't like doing high resolution rendering.
and for the record. a MAC cannot ever run an SLS, SLA, DLP, or any other rapid prototyping machine. they do not have the capability, and none of the companies are willing to put the time into writing the software, because they have an already solid base to work with in XP and windows.
don't get me wrong, i dig mac, i have an iPod. but they are made for people that don't want to do the work to maintain a computer. plain and simple. they are not infallable, they are not the end all be of comps. they are turning into a jokish fad.
like cracker said its funny they are resorting to Intel and Unix to make a better product...lol
Supporting software? You know dual boot is built in? No additional software needed. If you need to run ANY program at 100% native speed in ANY operating system, you can.
I don't have experience with solid works, but I'm betting it's a version thing. Sometimes the Mac version of a program WILL suck, or there is no other option for it. In that I case I use Parallels to run it, no rebooting, no emulation (it's virtualization). Even Windows Vista runs better on a Mac then it does on a PC. So I wouldn't know why solid works wouldn't.