redneckboarder
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- cumberland RI
somethin happeded to the guy he now has a broken arm and stuff
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,467504,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,467504,00.html
somethin happeded to the guy he now has a broken arm and stuff
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,467504,00.html
I'm so sorry...I, I didn't mean to recall painful memories...
![]()
Yeah I read what you wrote. It's not hard to see that you don't have anything original to say except to hide behind more dittohead crap that Limpoop spews out his what passes for his a**, er mouth. You're just another clone that is following someone else's lead.
Go ahead and cry about how the 'Obama's' supporters rally around the 'chosen one', I'm sure that they do. But that has nothing to do with me, I didn't vote for the man.
Try not to whine so much in the future.
actually I dont listen to limpoos, Im more of a Sean Hannity fan...
I'm a clone because I'm a republican, and I think different than you,
You shouldnt whine about someone whom is being sarcastic (with a hint of truth) its kinda hypocritical.
:tears:
I think its funny the guy ended getting hurt, if he tried that on Sadam he's be dead. He should be thankfull for that.
I don't listen to/watch any of the above mentioned people, but I gotta say, my first thought when people first said, "Too bad it didn't hit him" was, wait, they don't anyone making threats/wishing harm upon Obama, yet they can wish for Bush to get pegged with a shoe to the face? Not everyone was talking about Obama dying, some just wanted him hurt. I think that's stupid. I also think it's stupid to wish for a flying shoe to hit the current president. I don't think anyone here is arguing for being allowed to talk about assassinations or anything. Just looking for some parity. If it's wrong to hope for one to be hurt, why not both? If its only wrong to hope for death but ok to hope for injury, where do we draw the line? I'm not even saying the mods should step in, it just seems a bit off that someone says how it's a bit wrong to wish harm on someone just cuz you don't like em, and rather than the chorus of agreement with Obama, you're saying to quit whining :dunno:Man you're thick. It has nothing to do with you being a Republican.
Do you really think that there's a hint of truth about Obama's neophytes rising up to defend regardless of the accusation or the validity of such statements IN this forum and club?! If that's the case, you're much thicker than I've anticipated. I think that the people that get irritated and raise a shit storm when you and others make stupid statements or call for Obama to be assassinated are simply much less extremist than you or maybe they practice more critical thinking. But that's what you get when you're just a mouth piece for Mr. Hannity, O'Rielly, Limbaugh. . . . I don't see these political issues as black and white. I don't believe that many of us do see these political issues as black and white. Unless, it's the 2nd Amendment, but that's another thread.
Like I said before, I voted for the person whom I thought would do the best job this time around, and that happened to not be Obama. SO accusing me of being an Obama supporter is kind of pointless.
Assassination, racist jokes are offensive and can be considered illegal activities under certain legal lens. They also put our club in a bad light when looked upon by an outsider. And frankly, anyone that would want to join our club because of said subject matter, I wouldn't want joining our club. I would take issue if a fellow club member began seriously talking about how Bush needs to be murdered (sure impeach him, charge him with what ever but do it legal and be sure that the charges are real and not imagined). But that's not the case around here.
Not everyone was talking about Obama dying, some just wanted him hurt. I think that's stupid.
I don't listen to/watch any of the above mentioned people, but I gotta say, my first thought when people first said, "Too bad it didn't hit him" was, wait, they don't anyone making threats/wishing harm upon Obama, yet they can wish for Bush to get pegged with a shoe to the face? Not everyone was talking about Obama dying, some just wanted him hurt. I think that's stupid. I also think it's stupid to wish for a flying shoe to hit the current president. I don't think anyone here is arguing for being allowed to talk about assassinations or anything. Just looking for some parity. If it's wrong to hope for one to be hurt, why not both? If its only wrong to hope for death but ok to hope for injury, where do we draw the line? I'm not even saying the mods should step in, it just seems a bit off that someone says how it's a bit wrong to wish harm on someone just cuz you don't like em, and rather than the chorus of agreement with Obama, you're saying to quit whining :dunno:
So, are you a hate monger too?Im more of a Sean Hannity fan...
So if this thread turns racist it will get deleted? How are you going to justify hoping the current prez harm staying open-VS- deleting a thread that mentions harm to next prez. G-DOG, if your going to censor? At least be fair about it.Plus, that previous thread wasn't just closed because people were calling for harm to come to Obama, but also there were some racist crap being posted up in there. It wasn't just the jokes about Obama getting hurt . . .
So if this thread turns racist it will get deleted? How are you going to justify hoping the current prez harm staying open-VS- deleting a thread that mentions harm to next prez. G-DOG, if your going to censor? At least be fair about it.
Only if:wave: it's chocolate chip?Go cry me a river about the unfairness of all. Life is unfair, this forum is unfair, the moderators are unfair and I'm hypocrite. Here's a cookie. Hope it makes you feel better.
Only if:wave: it's chocolate chip?