blondejoncherokee
NAXJA Member
- Location
- sacramento
signed up for corva and BRC, again havent been a member in years. also donated to each a little bit and bought a shirt and some stickers from corva
I don’t want to give too much away to the other side but we will need to hire a Hydrologist to prove the roads will not damage the meadows.
I don't really understand how they can just pull this crap out of thier a$$es and a judge will actually agree with thier crap. It is, and has been, an existing road for a very long time. What is next. Do we start to close Hwy 4 for a year because there wasn't an environmental study done on the effects of the meadows it passes thru? And while we're at it lets include Hwy 50, 88, 395 and I-80 to the list. They all pass thru at least 1 meadow, as does most, if not all, of the highways in the Sierra Nevada mountain range. As with many other rulings/judgements now days, it really makes me wonder about the compentancy of our judges now days and thier ability to "read" the laws to support thier own agendas or ideals. Okay, rant over.
If we want to do something let's contact Hardy and offer to lend ANY help neccessary to get these studies done. Donations of equipment, work parties, transportation of equipment, etc. How about we offer to modify the actual trail to prevent travel off trail into these meadows by installing barricades, etc.