ZomBrady
Chubby Chaser Extraordinaire
- Location
- Albuquerque
Re: California takes a step back wards!
So then explain why a heterosexual couple who decides not to have children can get married are then afforded legal rights that a queer couple are not allowed to have?
Your argument falls apart when we look at straight couples that choose to be childless. Those couples have given up their reproductive choices to live a life that they find satisfying, the only real difference between them and a queer couple is that they have an 'inny' and an 'outy'. BUT MANY queer couples do want to raise children, and would satisfy this by adoption.
BlackSport96 said:That argument would work better if the gays were trying to establing a "pecking" order or if we were talking about being shacked up with Bubba in Prison...However, human homosexuals aren't trying to aid in the "survival of the species" or establish who's the boss, for them it is about sexual gratification, thus the goals and motivations are very different and the two examples don't really relate to each other.
So then explain why a heterosexual couple who decides not to have children can get married are then afforded legal rights that a queer couple are not allowed to have?
Your argument falls apart when we look at straight couples that choose to be childless. Those couples have given up their reproductive choices to live a life that they find satisfying, the only real difference between them and a queer couple is that they have an 'inny' and an 'outy'. BUT MANY queer couples do want to raise children, and would satisfy this by adoption.