- Location
- Rainy side of Washington
it's called a revolutionary caster adjuster because it likes to revolve while you are wheeling hasta
In this industry, no one counts the panhard as a link.4 link with a panhard, aka 5 link? Also arms are so short you end up with huge angle changes during suspension travel, resulting in significant changes in caster and pinion angle. Works fine at stock height, not so much when lifted. The arms are stamped sheetmetal junk. I'd much rather run any aftermarket arm than the stock crap.
you have no idea how much abuse those sheetmetal arms can stand up to.4 link with a panhard, aka 5 link? Also arms are so short you end up with huge angle changes during suspension travel, resulting in significant changes in caster and pinion angle. Works fine at stock height, not so much when lifted. The arms are stamped sheetmetal junk. I'd much rather run any aftermarket arm than the stock crap.
4 link with a panhard, aka 5 link? Also arms are so short you end up with huge angle changes during suspension travel, resulting in significant changes in caster and pinion angle. Works fine at stock height, not so much when lifted. The arms are stamped sheetmetal junk. I'd much rather run any aftermarket arm than the stock crap.
Goofy 5 link short arm junk FTW.
![]()
![]()
Can't count that as short arms, you have drop brackets...
Depends how you look at it I guess, its more or less the full evolution of short arms.
This is actual short arms with stock uppers and 4" lift, thinking my shocks being 8" travel and stock steering limit me some
Just picked up these 33's Saturday so I was out flexing to see what was needed to be trimmed.
![]()
![]()
Can i ask, why does it bother you what way someone spends their money?
If they have a 99% success rate, Why not leave it Alone..? IRO's rear Long arm Kit for the ZJ was not as Desirable as the Triangulated Claytons kit, so instead of Trashing IRO, I simply went with Claytons.. But guess what? I was then Shown a Bad Review of a Claytons Kit (wow.. No way!)
Who gives a Chit? I'd run an IRO kit on a Budget built XJ in a heart beat.. Because i've made MY own review of the kit watching it work flawlessly for 4 years now.. Does that mean i think Another brand is Garbage? Or that IRO is "Better" ???
You guys Act like a bunch of Liberals....
If I'm going with a 'budget' setup, I'd rather replace worn joints every once in a while (or just throw in some quality joints from another company) than worry every time I wheel if that caster adjuster is going to stay where it's supposed to.
Are you for real?
How about this rig..
![]()
IRO long arm. 4 years old. Daily driven 3 of those years. Probably 5k pure trail miles.
Please, enlighten me on his "luck". :dunno:
Like said, you don't have to be a mechanical engineer to realize that there is an obvious weak link in this system. What some people see as "acceptable" others see as a ticking time bomb. Myself and many others arent ok with "good enough" We want confidence that our front end is going to stay in one piece and get us home. If that bolt goes, other front end components go out with it.
You can't really believe this kit will survive for everyone under hard wheeling do you? Why doesn't everyone else build 3 links with 10mm bolts then? Its not like the failures are a myth we all made up.
(And of course this thread would turn into a flex contest lol)
I have seen one broken bolt and one failed caster adjuster.
Have you ever seen one fail?
Like really seen one?