I smell fish II....forged!

[420BlackXJ]

Your ignorance is reaching new levels.....who here, specifically, supports a "borrow and spend" philosophy? You make general statements like this, which appear to be no more that ideological talking points meant to create party division.

Seems hypocritcal of you to select that specific topic, yet defend a Democratic majority Congress and Obama's actions of borrowing more and spending more, yet somehow trying to make the last 4.5yrs of spending and borrowing all Bush's fault? (Recap, Congress approves spending and borrowing, as well as the President)

My position is that borrowing and spending has been out of control for decades, Reps and Dems alike are both to blame. 2012 elections should be about putting stop to this pattern and electing those who understand the Will of the People and will make the hard decisions that must be made to turn around the economy and follow the Constitution.

I would agree that your work buddy is misguided, I would never support a candidate based on a single issue.

1. Every republican voter. Seems to me that includes most of you disputing my posts.

2. The Iraq was is more responsible for the huge deficit than anything else. Along with the Bush tax cuts. Is that Obama's fault? He is taking the blame for the disastrous fiscal policy of the previous admin. Can you dispute that?

 

[Beezil]

The republican party is far from perfect....

but the fact that you think they're the party of "borrow and spend" and the democrats are not, is lunacy.

get your facts straight.

 

[420BlackXJ]

The republican party is far from perfect....

but the fact that you think they're the party of "borrow and spend" and the democrats are not, is lunacy.

get your facts straight.

The democrats are tax and spend. Or did you forget.
Deficits are acquired thru republican policies.

 

[Beezil]

The Iraq was is more responsible for the huge deficit than anything else.

quoted for the idiocy contained.

Along with the Bush tax cuts.

tax cuts don't create deficits cheif, spending does. of course, you won't understand this.....spend more than your revenue receipts and that's what you get.

and the other thing you community organizers didn't learn that the rest of us did in econ 101, is that tax cuts for the consumer, INCREASE revenue.

 

[XJEEPER]

Dude, don't feed the troll........he's not interested in an open discussion based on factual data.

Reminds me of a book I read last year......

 

[420BlackXJ]

Dude, don't feed the troll........he's not interested in an open discussion based on factual data.

Reminds me of a book I read last year......

XJEEPER, I was almost starting to respect you........ NOT

 

[420BlackXJ]

quoted for the idiocy contained.




tax cuts don't create deficits cheif, spending does. of course, you won't understand this.....spend more than your revenue receipts and that's what you get.

and the other thing you community organizers didn't learn that the rest of us did in econ 101, is that tax cuts for the consumer, INCREASE revenue.

Beezil, you can deny the truth till it hurts, that won't change it.

 

[Beezil]

New thread title:

I smell LIBTARDS

 

[CherBear]

Dude, don't feed the troll........he's not interested in an open discussion based on factual data.

Reminds me of a book I read last year......

Meh. His policies are good, but hes a bit of a melodramatic cry baby in my book.
I guess that is what gets you noticed theses days...

 

[420BlackXJ]

New thread title:

I smell LIBTARDS

Yeah, that will score you big points around here.

 

[Beezil]

Meh. His policies are good, but hes a bit of a melodramatic cry baby in my book.
I guess that is what gets you noticed theses days...

okay....

then give my guy a try....

got satelite?

Andrew Wilkow.

Patriot channel.

awesome.

 

[CherBear]

New thread title:

I smell LIBTARDS

+ 10 points.

Yeah, that will score you big points around here.

:moon:

okay....

then give my guy a try....

got satelite?

Andrew Wilkow.

Patriot channel.

awesome.

I do not, how ever I will listen to some of his shows on youtube when I get a chance.
Let me ask you these question about him first:
1. Is he ever seen crying or looking overly sad?
2. Does he regularly refer to the Obama Administration as the Third Reich?
3. Does he claim claim random events support his ideology or diminish others?

His own words “I could give a flying crap about the political process.... We're an entertainment company.” Forbes Magazine interview

 

[XJEEPER]

XJEEPER, I was almost starting to respect you........ NOT

I also read the Huffington Post occasionally......what's your sterotype for that? You seem to have one for everything else. There's a reason why most folks on the forum think you are 22 years old.......instead of your actual age of 54.

I don't need your respect, I prefer that you to educate yourself.

http://www.breitbart.com/

http://www.drudgereport.com/

http://trevorloudon.com/

http://www.wilkowmajority.com/

Thinking for yourself, armed with the truth.....is very enlightening.

Ignore 420BlackXJ: ON......I've wasted enough time trying to help you.

 

[Tom R.]

...after observing his candidate start an illegal war in Iraq. Of course it was only known in the top circle of the White House that Iraq was going to be the focus of the war on terror.

Revisionist? Get some history lessons for you and your friend.

That war was NEVER "illegal." Liberals attempt to keep the myth alive by saying "see, there were never any WMD." The very fact that Saddam kept firing at our jets in the no-fly zone was justification to attack. It's in the NATO resolution. Actually, Saddam broke at least two NATA resolutions that justified the war. Or was that conveniently lost on you?

Iraq was never the primary focus of the war of terror. Afghanistan was. I'd venture a guess that you never served.

 

[Whiplash_Syndicate]

The democrats are tax and spend. Or did you forget.
Deficits are acquired thru republican policies.

Um Yeah that's the unintelligent new democrat way of thinking here is a smart democrat that the party will never listen too.

http://www.naxja.org/forum/misc.php?do=bbcode#urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEdXrfIMdiU

 

[420BlackXJ]

I also read the Huffington Post occasionally......what's your sterotype for that? You seem to have one for everything else. There's a reason why most folks on the forum think you are 22 years old.......instead of your actual age of 54.

I don't need your respect, I prefer that you to educate yourself.

http://www.breitbart.com/

http://www.drudgereport.com/

http://trevorloudon.com/

http://www.wilkowmajority.com/

Thinking for yourself, armed with the truth.....is very enlightening.

Ignore 420BlackXJ: ON......I've wasted enough time trying to help you.

Oh, that's what you call it, help:rof:
Ahh, thanks for your "help". :moon:

 

[420BlackXJ]

Revisionist? Get some history lessons for you and your friend.

That war was NEVER "illegal." Liberals attempt to keep the myth alive by saying "see, there were never any WMD." The very fact that Saddam kept firing at our jets in the no-fly zone was justification to attack. It's in the NATO resolution. Actually, Saddam broke at least two NATA resolutions that justified the war. Or was that conveniently lost on you?

Iraq was never the primary focus of the war of terror. Afghanistan was. I'd venture a guess that you never served.

Denial works for you ha.:anon:

 

[Beezil]

+ 10 points.



I do not, how ever I will listen to some of his shows on youtube when I get a chance.
Let me ask you these question about him first:
1. Is he ever seen crying or looking overly sad?
2. Does he regularly refer to the Obama Administration as the Third Reich?
3. Does he claim claim random events support his ideology or diminish others?

the answers to the following test questions are:

1. no, well, at least hard to see through the radio dial. He may occasionally don a sad face, in mockery of whiney callers, you'll have to call in and ask him yourself.

2. No.

3. part a. ....Andrew Wilkow is sort of a polymath IMHO when it comes to finance, economy, business principles, understanding capitalism, as well as his ideological opponents various "bibles" such as saul alinskys "rules for radicals" and Marx's "communist manifesto". He is especially conversant with the US constitution. He is objective in his approach.

part b. the only time I've ever heard him diminish others is when they get personal, or cannot support their arugment with objective, or accurate information. In other words, to those who have it coming.

 

[CherBear]

the answers to the following test questions are:

1. no, well, at least hard to see through the radio dial. He may occasionally don a sad face, in mockery of whiney callers, you'll have to call in and ask him yourself.

2. No.

3. part a. ....Andrew Wilkow is sort of a polymath IMHO when it comes to finance, economy, business principles, understanding capitalism, as well as his ideological opponents various "bibles" such as saul alinskys "rules for radicals" and Marx's "communist manifesto". He is especially conversant with the US constitution. He is objective in his approach.

part b. the only time I've ever heard him diminish others is when they get personal, or cannot support their arugment with objective, or accurate information. In other words, to those who have it coming.

Sounds like my kind of guy!

Number three was sort of a jab at Beck (I guess they all were).
After the had his rally in DC a while ago, on his radio show he claimed as he was giving his speech, several geese flew over the crowd. He took this as a "fly over" of sorts, proclaiming God was showing his support for his cause.

 

[Crawler]

...After the had his rally in DC a while ago, on his radio show he claimed as he was giving his speech, several geese flew over the crowd. He took this as a "fly over" of sorts, proclaiming God was showing his support for his cause.

Moments after music signaled the start of Glenn's "Restoring Honor" rally...