CA Folks - the CBD vs. a motorized OHMVR Commission

Ed A. Stevens

NAXJA Member
NAXJA Member
Go to this link, if you want to get an idea what's at stake with the OHMVR Commission. Many motorists who want the fund to be used properly (for motorized recreation) want to remove CBD influence from OHMVR Commission decisions. Help all motorized recreation advocates accomplish this task and regain a pro-motor direction for the OHMVR Commission.

Read the CBD link to see they intend to keep control over the OHMVR and our Green sticker and fuel taxes.

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/OHMRV/step1

Even worse this Commissioner, John Brissenden, is rumored to have the support of none other that Barbra Boxer. Is this what we are up against (subversion of the California Democratic Party)?

Go to the link below for an example of a Gross action attempting to manipulate Federal policy, it can only be imagined what other things Brissenden has supported to gain the support of organizations like the CBD.

http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/default.asp?page_id=24182

So what? This policy means that any motorized recreation trail, track, or open-use area that may impact a desert riparian area (that means a canyon or stream bed) is excluded from receiving OHMVR funds. This can eliminate funds for Johnson Valley, most USFS & BLM creekside motorized trails, and most canyon trails (consider what is left to drive on).

OK so what to do about it:

Feb 7, 2006 CORVA Action Alert,

Your help is critically needed! Please call, email, fax and write to Assemblyman Fabian Nunez (D-46). His contact information is; Office Phone, (916) 319-2046, Fax, (916) 319-2146, E-Mail,

[email protected],

Mail address is, Capitol Building #219, Sacramento, Ca. 95814.

The Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Program is made up of appointed Commissioners. A few Commissioners have directed the Commission away from funds to enhance our sport, and instead, have spent our funds on programs that have limited or no provisions relating to improving and enhancing our off-road experience (they have spent the funds to close trails).

One Commissioner, John Brissenden, has continually worked to against motorized recreation. Based on his past actions within the Commission, his bias against motorized recreation and public access is readily apparent. John Brissenden is actively seeking a reappoiment by Speaker Nunez and we cannot allow this to occur.

Write Speaker Nunez and tell him that you do not want John Brissenden appointed for another term on the OHMVR commission.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Ed.
 
More ...

****


From: Thomas, Trudy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:31 AM
Subject: FYI: News Article re: Ideological splits plague group that governs off-roading


Distrust stirs the dust

Ideological splits plague group that governs off-roading
By Michael Gardner
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

February 21, 2006



JOHN GASTALDO / Union-Tribune

California State Park Ranger Jessica Murany met with off-road enthusiast Tom Price last week atop Blow Sand Hill at Ocotillo Wells State Vehicular Recreation Area east of Borrego Springs.

SACRAMENTO – When Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed Daphne Greene to manage the state's troubled off-road vehicle program, the first question she faced was whether she would be the new sheriff or the executioner.

Amid a dramatic surge in popularity, the sport's future has been clouded by a festering ideological feud. The state governing body that oversees grants and policies important to off-roading has split along lines loyal to either riders or environmentalists.

Lingering distrust has poisoned potential compromises that could benefit off-roaders, protect the environment and appease communities being invaded by the noise and pollution of the sport, say some of those involved.

“We can't come together on the simplest things,” lamented Michael Prizmich, the sheriff of Amador County and a member of the state's off-road oversight commission.

Clashes have escalated just as the Schwarzenegger administration prepares to make critical decisions on how to restructure the program and shake up the seven-member commission.

The 35-year-old program could even dissolve, although that's considered unlikely. A 1971 law that authorized the off-road program expires at the end of this year. Schwarzenegger has yet to advance a renewal proposal, frustrating off-roaders.

Some of the discord can be traced to the program's structure. California splits the management responsibility between the commission and a division of the state Parks and Recreation Department. Greene is in charge of the division, but must work with the commission. The program's budget is $55.6 million.

Off-roading has long drawn criticism from many quarters. Rogue riders leave an impression of noisy, smoggy machines plowing roughshod through pristine forests and sand dunes. Television ads for ATVs and trucks promote the wild image.



Now the sport is booming. Over the past five years, the number of permits sold for off-road vehicles nearly doubled, from 479,178 in 2001 to 900,861 in 2005 in California. Four million riders enjoyed state-run off-road parks last year, and countless more journeyed to national forests and other getaways. Network television carries off-road competition and a recent one-night event in San Francisco drew 37,000 fans.

Officially known as the state's Off-Road Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission, the oversight panel is made up of political appointees – four selected by the Legislature; three by the governor – who determine how millions of dollars are spent across the state. The money comes from two primary sources: a share of the state gas tax and permits, which run $25 every two years.

Greene touched off the latest flare-up when she blocked 46 local grants worth $5.4 million that the commission had approved. Backed by legal counsel, Greene dismissed the grants as “arbitrary and capricious.”

“How can the division go behind the backs of the appointed commission?” demanded Commissioner Harold Thomas, a Sacramento-area prosecutor who specializes in environmental law. “I can find no authority for what they've done. It's unprecedented.”

The deadlock threatens to hold up the entire $18 million in grant funds available for rider safety, trail improvement and enforcement programs. It's also strained relationships with federal authorities who manage national land used for off-road recreation.

Greene, a former off-road commissioner, said the action reflects the governor's goal of restoring credibility and accountability to the grants process.

For years, Greene said, “it was all about who's your friend” when it came time to dole out the money. “How fair is that?” she asked.

Off-road enthusiasts also have filed a lawsuit claiming commissioners secretly met to determine grants and let personal bias influence their decision.

Commissioners have distributed $141 million in grants since 1996 and still have the $18 million for this year.



JOHN GASTALDO / Union-Tribune

Off-roaders zip past each other on Blow Sand Hill at Ocotillo Wells State Vehicular Recreation Area east of Borrego Springs. Four million riders enjoyed state-run off-road parks last year, and countless more journeyed to national forests and other getaways.

“It's a challenge,” Greene said of trying to deal with the competing factions. “What we see now, unfortunately, is a situation where the individual opinions and agendas have clouded the greater responsibility.”

Others are less judicious. “The commission should come to a screeching halt. It should end,” said Commissioner Robert Chavez, an Encino resident aligned with off-roaders.

Commission Chairman Paul Spitler of Davis, a former director of the California Wilderness Coalition, said the commission justifiably changed course to become more environmentally friendly after years of domination by off-road users.

“In the past year and a half you've seen unprecedented efforts to usurp the role of the commission and roll back a lot of the environmental protections the Legislature initiated,” Spitler said. “It certainly appears this administration is trying to take us back to the bad old days.”

But Chavez, who has not attended a meeting for a year, said environmental factions seem bent on banning off-road use from public lands.

“It will be a happy day for them” when that happens, he said.

The state auditor brought the infighting to light last August in a blistering report that found favoritism in awarding contracts and lax oversight, among other problems.

Sen. Bill Morrow, an Oceanside Republican who pushed for the audit, has accused the commission of ignoring the auditor's recommendations.

“They haven't done a lick,” said Morrow, a candidate for San Diego's 50th Congressional District.

Morrow, an off-road enthusiast, has railed against certain state policies. In 1996 he was cited by a park ranger for doing “doughnuts” – driving in tight circles at high speed – in a four-wheel-drive vehicle that sported special legislative license plates. State parks Director Ruth Coleman has ordered Greene “to fix” the situation, parks spokesman Roy Stearns said. Purging the commission is one option, Stearns said.

“If the only way to get to where we're going is to change the commission, to put a more fair commission up there, that's OK with us,” he said.

But some commissioners don't agree with the audit's findings. Being unpaid, part-time and busy in their private lives, they say, makes it difficult to respond rapidly. A meeting is planned later this year on the audit, 12 months after its public release.

The growing friction is evident to those who follow the commission.

“The commission is dysfunctional and divided,” said Fred Wiley, executive director of the Off-Road Business Association, based in Santee.

Albert Llata of Los Angeles said off-road enthusiasts deserve commissioners who will work on their behalf.

“Does Oscar Mayer hire vegetarians?” he asked.

Others are more blunt. Dave Pickett, a Folsom off-roader speaking at a recent commission meeting, accused the pro-environment majority of being “obstructionists” and demanded their resignations.

The environmental camp writes off the complaints as sour grapes from off-roaders.

“The game has changed. For 30 years, they had it their way,” said Karen Schambach, a community activist in the foothills north of Sacramento.

The Schwarzenegger administration itself has escalated tensions by raiding accounts meant for off-roading and spending the money on in-house office functions and parks that ban dune buggies, four-wheelers, ATVs and snowmobiles.

State officials justified the diversions, saying some helped create off-road opportunities. They couldn't explain, however, why Angel Island, in San Francisco Bay, received off-road revenues.

Parks officials say the diversions of money have ended, although the account is still owed $21 million borrowed during former Gov. Pete Wilson's administration.

“Absolutely – they should be angry,” Greene said of off-roaders frustrated over the use of funds earmarked for their sport.

However, there is talk within the administration of increasing registration fees on off-road vehicles, to perhaps $18 a year from the current $12.50.

In addition to registration fees, the program receives millions annually in gas taxes based on estimates of how much fuel is used by street-legal, four-wheel-drive and other vehicles when drivers go off paved surfaces.

A huge slice of the program's budget also subsidizes the federal government. Since 1996, commissioners have awarded $61.8 million to the Bureau of Land Management and an additional $59.3 million to the U.S. Forest Service.

Schwarzenegger brought in Greene when lawmakers were preparing to approve the audit that was expected to shake up things.

Greene has credentials as an off-roader and environmentalist. She was a world-class competitor in four-wheel-drive racing, is an avid rock climber and a mountaineer, having scaled daunting peaks like Kilimanjaro, Denali, Rainier and Shasta.

Greene said the disputes overshadow a broader issue. Given growth and environmental pressures, what is the state's commitment to the sport, she said, particularly as a new generation that has never heard of Smokey Bear and Woodsy Owl puts keys in the ignition.

“Where's our land ethic?” she asked.














Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20060221-9999-1n21offroad.html


Sorry about the dead horse thing -- it's really a peak in Northern California that starts with an "S" and ends in "asta" (some NAXJA funnay).

.
 
Ed A. Stevens said:
Greene has credentials as an off-roader and environmentalist. She was a world-class competitor in four-wheel-drive racing, is an avid rock climber and a mountaineer, having scaled daunting peaks like Kilimanjaro, Denali, Rainier and Shasta.

Greene said the disputes overshadow a broader issue. Given growth and environmental pressures, what is the state's commitment to the sport, she said, particularly as a new generation that has never heard of Smokey Bear and Woodsy Owl puts keys in the ignition.

“Where's our land ethic?” she asked.

Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20060221-9999-1n21offroad.html


Sorry about the dead horse thing -- it's really a peak in Northern California that starts with an "S" and ends in "asta" (some NAXJA funnay).

.

Although inadvertant very apropos. Once again we are getting hammered by the "exclus..." excuse me "environmentalists." Letter on the way.
 
Ed A. Stevens said:
Go to this link, if you want to get an idea what's at stake with the OHMVR Commission. Many motorists who want the fund to be used properly (for motorized recreation) want to remove CBD influence from OHMVR Commission decisions. Help all motorized recreation advocates accomplish this task and regain a pro-motor direction for the OHMVR Commission.

Read the CBD link to see they intend to keep control over the OHMVR and our Green sticker and fuel taxes.

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/OHMRV/step1

Even worse this Commissioner, John Brissenden, is rumored to have the support of none other that Barbra Boxer. Is this what we are up against (subversion of the California Democratic Party)?

Go to the link below for an example of a Gross action attempting to manipulate Federal policy, it can only be imagined what other things Brissenden has supported to gain the support of organizations like the CBD.

http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/default.asp?page_id=24182

So what? This policy means that any motorized recreation trail, track, or open-use area that may impact a desert riparian area (that means a canyon or stream bed) is excluded from receiving OHMVR funds. This can eliminate funds for Johnson Valley, most USFS & BLM creekside motorized trails, and most canyon trails (consider what is left to drive on).

OK so what to do about it:

Feb 7, 2006 CORVA Action Alert,

Your help is critically needed! Please call, email, fax and write to Assemblyman Fabian Nunez (D-46). His contact information is; Office Phone, (916) 319-2046, Fax, (916) 319-2146, E-Mail,

[email protected],

Mail address is, Capitol Building #219, Sacramento, Ca. 95814.

The Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Program is made up of appointed Commissioners. A few Commissioners have directed the Commission away from funds to enhance our sport, and instead, have spent our funds on programs that have limited or no provisions relating to improving and enhancing our off-road experience (they have spent the funds to close trails).

One Commissioner, John Brissenden, has continually worked to against motorized recreation. Based on his past actions within the Commission, his bias against motorized recreation and public access is readily apparent. John Brissenden is actively seeking a reappoiment by Speaker Nunez and we cannot allow this to occur.

Write Speaker Nunez and tell him that you do not want John Brissenden appointed for another term on the OHMVR commission.

so when is he (John Brissenden) up for re-appointment?

according to here: http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a46/press05/a462005159.htm

he was appointed in September 21, 2005...


More details on his stupidity here:
http://www.off-road.com/land/brc_files_complaint.html

I am all for writing letters and keeping trails open, but at the same time I dont want to appear un-educated on the issue and blankly send mail on an issue that was handled weeks ago... and make the OHV community look bad...
 
XJ_ranger said:
so when is he (John Brissenden) up for re-appointment?

according to here: http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a46/press05/a462005159.htm

he was appointed in September 21, 2005...

****

I dont want to appear un-educated on the issue and blankly send mail on an issue that was handled weeks ago... and make the OHV community look bad...


From your link, "Speaker Núñez Appoints John Brissenden To The Sierra Nevada Conservancy Governing Board."

The Sierra Nevada Conservancy Governing Board is not the OHMVR Commission. He is currently on the OHMVR Commission board, but I believe the new term appointment has not been made (it has not been published).

John Brissenden is quite active in volunteer appointments on boards and panels that direct the future of recreation and resource management issues that appear to possibly impact his business interests. His actions also reflect an opponent of motorized recreation at all levels. His conflict with legal snowmobile operations near his resort are only one aspect of his conflict of interest.

The conflicts between the Commissioners and the Agency is not over, and it's not too late to send a letter asking that the Commission appointment process be improved to better reflect the public paying for the OHV mission.

.
 
Ed A. Stevens said:
From your link, "Speaker Núñez Appoints John Brissenden To The Sierra Nevada Conservancy Governing Board."

The Sierra Nevada Conservancy Governing Board is not the OHMVR Commission. He is currently on the OHMVR Commission board, but I believe the new term appointment has not been made (it has not been published).

John Brissenden is quite active in volunteer appointments on boards and panels that direct the future of recreation and resource management issues that appear to possibly impact his business interests. His actions also reflect an opponent of motorized recreation at all levels. His conflict with legal snowmobile operations near his resort are only one aspect of his conflict of interest.

The conflicts between the Commissioners and the Agency is not over, and it's not too late to send a letter asking that the Commission appointment process be improved to better reflect the public paying for the OHV mission.

.

Thanks Ed.

Ill put together a letter here later (tomorrow) and post it up incase anyone wants to copy it...
 
Back
Top