JeepFreak21
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Cameron Park, CA
I'd tell them to pound sand, I smog my junk every 2 years. They say its to make sure the smog stations are being accurate and performing good tests so its better for us and the state...I like how they make their own rules and then impose things on citizens like its a favor. "Oh, we're just doing it to make sure the smog stations are doing their job". I'm not against clean water, air, having a clean environment and treading lightly, etc...but I'm against government ass'ing into everything. I'm surprised they don't regulate what light bulbs we can use or how much water our toilets can use..oh wait...
i wish they would do the proper research that shows the marginal effect on the environmnt to keep a used car running even if it emits more than a newer car (recycling is best anyway) than to extract all new raw materials, ship them to plants, and run tons of electricity that is powered by over 80% fossil fuels on average. i feel that if someone did the analysis they would find the effect of keeping a used car running for a 20 year time horizon that only gets 15 mpg and emits over the limit will greatly outweigh the fixed effects of building an entirely new car that gets 50mpg over the same 20yr time horizon since it will still emit to some extent plus the huge fixed emissions associated with the entire process of building a new car will grossly outweigh the marginal emissions from a used car .
It is not the people's burden to insure that private companies are doing their job, nor is it the governments.
This kind of shit infuriates me, by heart is pounding...need a break.
I tell you what this is just one more reason to get the hell out of California.
Actually, the max allowed in Colorado are 33's. And even sometimes they still give you a hassle.
Sorry for the intrusion...
i feel that if someone did the analysis they would find the effect of keeping a used car running for a 20 year time horizon that only gets 15 mpg and emits over the limit will greatly outweigh the fixed effects of building an entirely new car that gets 50mpg over the same 20yr time horizon since it will still emit to some extent plus the huge fixed emissions associated with the entire process of building a new car will grossly outweigh the marginal emissions from a used car .
You are probably right. There was an article on how operating a Hummer is actually being better for the environment than operating a Prius. Taking in the account all the components, and how one would recycle them...
I did, and its awesome! :looser:
What would they do if you said your Jeep was AWD, and couldnt be put on the rollers? And can you still do "oversized" tires in Cali? I know in CO 35'' tires are the max allowed.
Ah I hate to rain on the "bitch at nothing parade" but if you READ the article it clearly states, "voluntary evaluation brought no consequences". Which means you can absolutely decline to participate. When the Officer asks you to pull to the side into the cones simply and politely ask if he is asking or ordering you to do so. Then simply state you are under the belief that you have a right to decline and then ask him if you may leave. Don't accept any answer other than yes unless he wishes to intiate a full blown traffic stop. Of which he can do. But understand your rights and by all means follow his directions to a "T". When the Officer states you have a right to decline say thank you with a smile and pull away.