Vanimal
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- escondido, ca
Re: just another shitbox making its way to 1tons. " project neglected"
what the hell are you talking about?
OP:
I ran 16" coilovers in the rear of my xj, spring rates were 200/300 with a helper spring on top. It was a triple rate setup.
On the front i ran 14" coilovers with 150/275, dual rate setup. I had approx 6" uptravel in the front, 7-8" in the rear at 5-5.5" lift. My jeep weighed 4800lbs with 1 tons, 37"s, winch, doubler, etc.
I've tried softer and stiffer, i'd definitely rather be on the stiff side than the soft side for stability reasons. It had no problem flexing, and would still flex with all it's travel even with stiffer springs, so i wouldn't worry about that too much. I also liked to have the dual rate stop set within about 1"-1.5" from the slider at ride height. This helped a ton with handling, and i never really noticed the transition to only the 300lb/275lb spring rates.
Go to any ultra 4 race. I guarantee on 90% of the rigs you will not find a spring with a rate higher than 200 and that's even on trailing arm cars
Another thing is try to keep your two rates within 50lbs of each other. The transition will be a lot less harsh
what the hell are you talking about?
OP:
I ran 16" coilovers in the rear of my xj, spring rates were 200/300 with a helper spring on top. It was a triple rate setup.
On the front i ran 14" coilovers with 150/275, dual rate setup. I had approx 6" uptravel in the front, 7-8" in the rear at 5-5.5" lift. My jeep weighed 4800lbs with 1 tons, 37"s, winch, doubler, etc.
I've tried softer and stiffer, i'd definitely rather be on the stiff side than the soft side for stability reasons. It had no problem flexing, and would still flex with all it's travel even with stiffer springs, so i wouldn't worry about that too much. I also liked to have the dual rate stop set within about 1"-1.5" from the slider at ride height. This helped a ton with handling, and i never really noticed the transition to only the 300lb/275lb spring rates.