langer1
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Mineral City,Ohio
It was extremist Republicans that drove AMC to Canada.
Vandalized gas tank
- Thread starter BudTX
- Start date
Rev Den
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Plainfield, IL
Reindeer said:
OK....I'll play.
Where? What EXACTLLY did I post that was a lie? Actually in re-reading your comment you said "You have lied about everything that you have posted" so, you must now prove that everything I have posted is untrue, EVERYTHING, all 2000+ posts. As you are unable to prove that all my posts are untrue, you sir, have lied again.
You made the statment
"I know that it was extremist Republicans who destroyed my Jeep, and that is a stone cold fact."
Therefore you are responsable to prove that statment.
Waiting.
Rev
Last edited:
bajacalal
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- San Diego (North County), California
Ok,
Jumping to conclusions is in reference to bieng sold a bill of goods about the Republicans bieng a party of defense of civil rights. Like I said, I disagree with the stance each party takes on various issues. I simply did now elaborate as much as you tend to (am I lazy or are you a really good typer?). In that instance, I felt you assumed I go straight ticket w/ the Republicans, which I don't. Thats why I said "what makes you think" which is a figure of speech anyway, this isin't a forum intended for formal political debate, forgive me for using a more conversational style, typical of the forum. I am trying not to make arguments about you, only in response to things you state.
I agree with you that- The Repulicans in office today are attempting to limit the interpretation of various amendments. The Efforts to eliminate the Miranda warnings among other things, like the Patriot Act. Notice how fast the PA was implemented after 9/11. No way somebody came up with it overnight, it was already sitting in someone's desk, (John Ashcroft, I'm looking at your direction) waiting for a conveinent time to launch it. Whose that guy Bush nominated for Atty. General, what do you think of him?
California, has a very liberal state government. And one that does not reflect what the voting populace wants. The proposition (referendum) to prohibit gay marraige was approved by the voters. Its the state government (senante and courts) is liberal and isin't following the voters. Same thing happened w/ Prop. 187 a decade ago. Voters said- sorry, were not going to pay for education/healthcare of children or anyone that isin't legally residing here. That was overturned too. The government is more liberal than the voters. Watch what happens if redistricting is accomplished (by Schwartznegger). What Schwartzenegger has done is not relavant to this argument. He identified himself as "a moderate Republican" and the people went ok, thats what we want. My argument is that our "progressive" gvmt. isin't reflecting public opinion. I don't hate or disdain Gays for the record. No, I don't believe that they should be granted the same status as a traditional marraige. Also, this was/is, an example of a conservative people w/ liberal gvmt.
Support for taking [my] money- Death tax???
Hate for disabled/vetrans? Wow, where did you get this one. I have nothing against any assistance provided to veterans or the disabled. This would be jumping to conclusions, though I understand where your coming from. Have constructed a building in CA recently? The ADA act goes too far in many respects. Take a commercial kitchen for example. Clearly it would be dangerous for a disabled person to operate the frier (contact w/ hot grease) but, the frier has to be installed so that this person can reach in, grab the basket and turn around. It goes on and on like this. I have nothing against the disabled working. There are some things though, that can't be reasonably accomodated to the disabled, the liberals can't seem to accept that.
I have not jumped to any conclusions. This is a falsehood.
By "political parties" I mean the members such as registered voters to that party. What I find disturbing is how you associate Republicans or people w/ a conservative viewpoint w/ the destruction or vandalism of your property (breaking your stuff, whats the difference). I don't think your credible if you say that this happened "because of Republicans" instead of "because some immature jackass doesn't like what I'm doing."
Anyway, yeah I agree that partisian politics is a big problem in the U.S. as is special interests politics (which people in most countries call "corruption"). I'm done though, if you have any other issues to address w/ me, please use the appropriate forum, continuing there would be better. Political arguments wear me out so I'm done for today anyway.
Jumping to conclusions is in reference to bieng sold a bill of goods about the Republicans bieng a party of defense of civil rights. Like I said, I disagree with the stance each party takes on various issues. I simply did now elaborate as much as you tend to (am I lazy or are you a really good typer?). In that instance, I felt you assumed I go straight ticket w/ the Republicans, which I don't. Thats why I said "what makes you think" which is a figure of speech anyway, this isin't a forum intended for formal political debate, forgive me for using a more conversational style, typical of the forum. I am trying not to make arguments about you, only in response to things you state.
I agree with you that- The Repulicans in office today are attempting to limit the interpretation of various amendments. The Efforts to eliminate the Miranda warnings among other things, like the Patriot Act. Notice how fast the PA was implemented after 9/11. No way somebody came up with it overnight, it was already sitting in someone's desk, (John Ashcroft, I'm looking at your direction) waiting for a conveinent time to launch it. Whose that guy Bush nominated for Atty. General, what do you think of him?
California, has a very liberal state government. And one that does not reflect what the voting populace wants. The proposition (referendum) to prohibit gay marraige was approved by the voters. Its the state government (senante and courts) is liberal and isin't following the voters. Same thing happened w/ Prop. 187 a decade ago. Voters said- sorry, were not going to pay for education/healthcare of children or anyone that isin't legally residing here. That was overturned too. The government is more liberal than the voters. Watch what happens if redistricting is accomplished (by Schwartznegger). What Schwartzenegger has done is not relavant to this argument. He identified himself as "a moderate Republican" and the people went ok, thats what we want. My argument is that our "progressive" gvmt. isin't reflecting public opinion. I don't hate or disdain Gays for the record. No, I don't believe that they should be granted the same status as a traditional marraige. Also, this was/is, an example of a conservative people w/ liberal gvmt.
Support for taking [my] money- Death tax???
Hate for disabled/vetrans? Wow, where did you get this one. I have nothing against any assistance provided to veterans or the disabled. This would be jumping to conclusions, though I understand where your coming from. Have constructed a building in CA recently? The ADA act goes too far in many respects. Take a commercial kitchen for example. Clearly it would be dangerous for a disabled person to operate the frier (contact w/ hot grease) but, the frier has to be installed so that this person can reach in, grab the basket and turn around. It goes on and on like this. I have nothing against the disabled working. There are some things though, that can't be reasonably accomodated to the disabled, the liberals can't seem to accept that.
I have not jumped to any conclusions. This is a falsehood.
By "political parties" I mean the members such as registered voters to that party. What I find disturbing is how you associate Republicans or people w/ a conservative viewpoint w/ the destruction or vandalism of your property (breaking your stuff, whats the difference). I don't think your credible if you say that this happened "because of Republicans" instead of "because some immature jackass doesn't like what I'm doing."
Anyway, yeah I agree that partisian politics is a big problem in the U.S. as is special interests politics (which people in most countries call "corruption"). I'm done though, if you have any other issues to address w/ me, please use the appropriate forum, continuing there would be better. Political arguments wear me out so I'm done for today anyway.
Gil BullyKatz
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- 2003UB313 Planet ERIS
IH8RDS
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Hampton, VA
langer1 said:
LOL
RAINdeer = lastara
I really enjoy personal attacks....
