And this is why I try to stay away from these types of threads. For one people are always so FU#$ING picky about only agreeing with themselves, and two somehow SOCAL always finds a way to piss people off!
I think (correct me if I'm wrong Bent) you took this...
... the wrong way Justin. I think Bent was asking if your statement ...
... still applied under those conditions.
I think (correct me if I'm wrong Bent) you took this...
... the wrong way Justin. I think Bent was asking if your statement ...
... still applied under those conditions.
I'll bet you were a riot to watch in a physics class. Pssst, gravity is real too.
:roflmao:
Beliefs have nothing to do with it. It's a fact; homosexuality, drug addiction and alcoholism, to name but a few, are all symptoms of an obsessive-compulsive disorder.
How did he force his beliefs on anybody? Did I miss something?
So, your best bud from grade school shows up one day and he's all strung out. Do you accept his new junkie lifestyle as OK because he's just being 'true' to himself? Even if that 'truth' is chemically induced, it is his current 'truth'.
Source? I'd love to see that study. I'll bet it's... enlightening.
i wonder if he recieved any "special" PM's like he was hoping for.
I'll bet there is an old and new book too.
its called SAGE : http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sageThis post intentionally left blank.
UD said:4. sage Within the context of text and image forums, "sage" or "saging" is the act of adding commentary that will not renew a thread's position within the forum.
This is done for one of two reasons:
-As a generosity to other posters - a long living but moot thread is not of aid to anyone, and this acts as a discrete manner to add complementary information.
-Exclusively as a harsh statement of reprisal - feeling that the content is inappropriate or that the manner of the poster is unsuitable.