Hi, and thanks for the welcomes, everyone.
casm said:
...but particularly from a hobbyist standpoint it seems as though the available componentry really relegates them to the nifty but not completely practical category.
As for component availability, I'm not sure what you're referring to? True, we as hobbyists tend to be limited in what battery types we can choose from (and thus how much range we get) because of the current cost of advanced battery types (NiMH, Li-Ion, Li-Poly). Other than batteries, though, I wouldn't say there is any problem getting all the necessary components to build an Electric Vehicle. But maybe I'm missing your point?
casm said:
Thing is, though, that 35 miles is followed by two hours of downtime.
I hope I didn't imply in my previous posts that 35 miles per charge and 2-hours of charge time is what all EVs get. Quite the contrary, the range and charge time of an EV depends on many factors such as the size/weight of the vehicle and what components you used when you converted it. I only get 35 miles per charge because my Jeep is pretty big, heavy, and has the aerodynamics of a rolling brick (I mean all this in a kind way regarding my Jeep). Whereas a small, efficient car EV conversion can pretty easily achieve 50-60 miles per charge with a similar setup and lead acid batteries. Similarily, I can charge in 2 hours because I have (and am limited by) a 30-amp battery charger. Had I bought the 50-amp model, I could be charging in about an hour. Another tactic for faster charging includes using multiple chargers wired in parallel... which can give you 30-45 minute recharge times or lower (assuming you have the grid conenctions to feed multiple chargers). At any rate, I'd like to encourage everyone to check out the EVAlbum at
http://www.evalbum.com/ . It is a photo album and database where you can check out the specs of many different EVs. It doesn't get close to being a comprehensive listing, but includes quite a few vehicles nonetheless, and allows you to get a feel of the different capabilities (range, top speed, etc) of different EVs.
casm said:
Point taken, but they're still largely out of the reach of most hobbyists. The support systems necessary to operate them efficiently are also considerably more complex, from what I understand (and I may be off-base on this, so please correct me if I am).
If they are out of reach it is because of their price, not avaliability. They are being used in some conversions now. For example, check out this Honda CRX conversion here:
http://www.metricmind.com/ac_honda/main.htm . As for support systems, it depends on the specific application. At the very minimum, batteries like Li-Ion and Li-Poly should have some sort of battery monitoring system. Though, such a system can describe a wide variety of equipment with varying levels of complexity, intelligence, cost, and availability. One system that will be available soon to help solve the delemma of finding a good BMS system is the one being developed by
http://www.metricmind.com/
casm said:
Compared to fuel costs across the same time period for the same distance travelled, how do they compare when the up-front cost of the batteries are figured in?
I'll get back to you on this when I get some time to dig up those calculations...
casm said:
- While they may claim it's cleaner to relocate emissions to the power station, what happens when there are literally tens of thousands (or, as could hypothetically be the case in this part of the country, millions) of EVs plugged in and charging at any given time? We've already got power shortages and rolling blackouts here, -snip- At best, it's a zero-gain proposition.
I disagree about it being a zero-gain proposition because you *are* gaining several important things. First, you are reducing overall pollution when driving electric. This is not a claim, it is a fact. I'd rather not get into the whys here and now, because quite honestly this topic requires _much_ more time to discuss. Also, we can become more energy-independent, not only as a country, but as individuals (if you generate your own power via solar or wind). It should be obvious how important this is because we depend so much on transportation to get on with our daily lives. And I don't think the power shortage concern will be as big of a problem as you think. It's not like millions of EVs are suddenly going to start sucking power from the grid tomorrow. So saying that today's power grid cannot handle the millions of EVs of tommorrow is a bit silly. Any change of this proportion happening this quickly would be problematic and very unlikely at that.
casm said:
Also, I don't see how it's any harder to control emissions on private vehicles - they're tested periodically, the same as the plants are;
Yes, but how many people cheat and get away with it? For example, someone who has gutted the catalytic converter to get more power. They'll get away with it until inspections, unless they cheat again by temporarily installing a good cat. converter so they can pass the inspections only to go reinstall the gutted cat. afterwards. So much for reducing pollution. Many people do this. Even worse, many areas still don't have emissions testing.
casm said:
- By moving the pollution source out of the cities, all you're doing is pushing it out into the country. People do live there too. Nobody wants to be downwind from the problem in either case, but all this is doing is getting it out of the urban backyard and into the rural one.
I was not trying to suggest that polluting the rural areas is the right thing to do! I think we should be using clean energy sources and do away with it all together. But if we have to be making this pollution somewhere, make it away from as many people as possible. That means get it off of the streets and out of the cities where most people live and breath and where the air quality is worst.
casm said:
Not trying to knock what you've accomplished, but like I say I'm still skeptical as to the overall benefits of EVs. Out of curiosity, have you looked into regenerative braking systems or storage battery flywheels?
I understand... and I also realize that I may not fully convince you or anyone else of the benefits of driving electric. But I'm trying my best

. As for regen, yes I've looked into it. The short answer is that it is hard to implement safely on DC drive systems, and isn't commonly used with them. AC drive systems, on the other hand, almost always include regen braking because it is very easy to achieve regen with these systems.
Hope that all makes sense and answers your questions. I'll be out of town for awhile, so sorry to those whose posts I didn't have time to address tonight... be back soon
-Nick
http://Go.DriveEV.com/
1988 Jeep Cherokee 4x4 EV