I've lost my mind.. or an MP90 on a stroker

stock Jeep 4.0L 190HP
+add stroker to 4.6L adds 15% displacement but due to all the limitations of the jeep 12% is closer to the actual increase in HP
Thats rich coming form someone that has trouble turning a bolt. A stroker is not just displacement being changed. Its not a bolt on, so you obviously have no idea about the details of one.

Go back to your bolt-ons, 3/8" steel plate seat brackets and your IAT temps. I didn't ask your opinion, because you don't know crap. I also didn't make any predictions. Learn to read. I said what an inaccurate calc (which you love) said.
 
...say 366hp with 6 psi of boost. That is given that the stroker is putting out 260 hp (hopefully more)QUOTE]

That is your prediction, you wrote it.
 
...say 366hp with 6 psi of boost. That is given that the stroker is putting out 260 hp (hopefully more).

That is your prediction, you wrote it.
 
You took that out of context... you think no one is going to see what I really wrote like 5 post ago? What I said was
The calcs, which I don't hold much stock in, say 366hp with 6 psi of boost.
That is what several calc predict.

Are you this retarded in real life too?
 
The problem with ignore is that it lets people who aren't aware of the fact that someone has no idea what they're talking about think they are learning something when they are being misled.
 
The problem with ignore is that it lets people who aren't aware of the fact that someone has no idea what they're talking about think they are learning something when they are being misled.
That's clear as mud.

Hey, just put it on a dyno. I have.
 
:rattle: FTS Turbo is the way to go. Boostwerks is were its at.
 
"can't get a clean pull" :dunno:
I noticed that too. Sounds like a problem with the dyno operator.
:rattle: FTS Turbo is the way to go. Boostwerks is were its at.
That has less to do with this thread then what CobraMarty is rambling about. BTW, If I wanted a turbo I would have gone that route.

BTW, I have a pre stroker dyno run and intend to do a stroker dyno run then a SC dyno run.
 
I noticed that too. Sounds like a problem with the dyno operator.

That has less to do with this thread then what CobraMarty is rambling about. BTW, If I wanted a turbo I would have gone that route.

BTW, I have a pre stroker dyno run and intend to do a stroker dyno run then a SC dyno run.
I was joking man do to all the bitching cobra has done involving super chargers.
 
I was joking man do to all the bitching cobra has done involving super chargers.
Maybe he will do a turbo next so he can have something else to bs about.
 
It's harder to bolt a second turbo on for show without it being obvious
 
Boostwerks is having the same issues with the auto trans on the dyno.

You guys are the only ones doing the bitching. Cry on.
 
This is getting old, you kiddies need to grow the hell up.

MODS here dont need this constant headache from a couple kids who cant act as adults and keep a discussion civil.

GTFU and STFU..
 
I'm just here for the entertainment.

:popcorn:
 
Taking a break from the banter, the intake has been cut.

After a quick sandblasting clean up:
P1280733.JPG


As I mentioned earlier taking the top off at an angle and welding a plate to it will restrict #3 and #4 intake runners if left unmodified. The side wall and bottom wall will need to be cut.

Unmodified side:
P1280734.JPG


P1280737.JPG


Modified side, not even close do being where I want it:
P1280735.JPG


Also, once the plate is welded on I will need to go into the intake runner and open it up a bit where the plate seals against the runner.

P1280742.JPG



Its rough now and needs a lot of clean up before being welded up. Many hand grinding hours are anticipated.
 
Interesting concept of unequal length runners. Don't you think that unequal length runners will have an effect on the airflow to each individual cylinder? So won't cylinders 3 and 4 will run lean due to the increased airflow of the shorter runners?
 
Back
Top