- Location
- Desert Beach So Cal
KaHOnas said:I just enjoy the time and effort put into the restoration/upkeep of a fine old automobile.
Case in point...in NY, my mother is still in possession of a '63 Ford Galaxie 500XL convertible. Somewhat rare, far as I can tell, since I am having an exceptionally difficult time finding any mention of the 500XL convertibles online (not that I'm using that as my ONLY indicator, but all signs so far point to rare, but not necessarily desirable).
I agree. The respect granted to anyone who takes the effort to restore, refurbish, build, clone, or hot-rod an older vehicle is admirable, and deserved (even if, IMO, the clone craze is out of hand).
The 63 Galaxie 500XL (not to mention a convertible) is very collectible (considered one of the best years to collect). The 406 versions bring upwards of $60,000. The more normal 352 versions ring in auction prices in the mid-$20K range. The not so original drivetrain versions bring in anywhere from $6K to $50K (302 drivers to 427 upgraded rods). You can still find beater examples for $1,200 (more and more rare) but these need significant work (rust belt cars and nothing original barely trailer safe projects).
The Galaxie is an example of mark where the stronger muscle-rod conversions (427/429/460 conversions) with similar suspension and brake upgrades bring in nearly the same money as an original 406 tri-power (with the original, marginal, brake and suspension performance).
This example illustrates my major adversion with clones, if you make the effort to duplicate or improve on a major milestone muscle car combination, why not go the extra yard and improve the rest of the package?
Rather than pass off a clone as a 98% reproduction of a 69' Yenko 427 Camaro, why not build a modern 502 with four wheel disc brakes, a cage, and Guildstrand suspension upgrades that make the original seem weak in all aspects of performance? If the goal (and respect gained) is from superior performance, why stop at the engine and drivetrain?