hello everyone!!!!

In his defense, the part about the signs being ripped down constantly is a good thing for people to know. When I wheeled out ther 8 years ago, the owner said it was fine. I told him we would tread lightly and teach people not to litter or be asshats. He was happy to have us there. I woudln't have known the situation was any different if Sean hadn't posted so (not saying I would assume it was the same after all those years!).
Billy
Billy,
Why do you need to defend anyone?
You do understand they use our words to hurt us right?
Not condoning it is still talking about it.

This is a true pull quote from what you just posted above:

. . .the signs being ripped down constantly is a good thing . . .

That is your words, a pull quote from your post without any text edits.

This could be put in a flyer, a presentation or even a petition for tree hungers to sign to keep us off our land.

Posting up that "we would Tread Lightly" is posting up that other times we don't "Tread Lightly"

Not trying to slam anyone for doing anything wrong, just have some thought to what you are posting. I don't get why anyone would post up about "Advocating illegal wheeling" when even the posts "not condoning" it can be used to hurt us.
 
Billy,
Why do you need to defend anyone?
You do understand they use our words to hurt us right?
Not condoning it is still talking about it.

This is a true pull quote from what you just posted above:



That is your words, a pull quote from your post without any text edits.

This could be put in a flyer, a presentation or even a petition for tree hungers to sign to keep us off our land.

Posting up that "we would Tread Lightly" is posting up that other times we don't "Tread Lightly"

Not trying to slam anyone for doing anything wrong, just have some thought to what you are posting. I don't get why anyone would post up about "Advocating illegal wheeling" when even the posts "not condoning" it can be used to hurt us.

That's all well and good but you do realize that they also just make things up, right? Or they register on our boards and gain our confidence and then make posts that make us look bad.

Would you rather the OP and other members wheel in illegal areas and be photographed in those areas while sporting a NAXJA sticker because we were too scared the other side would take our warning posts out of context?

Billy
 
Maybe we should have a perpetual "DON'T WHEEL HERE!!" thread? Of course, the greenies could leave the "DON'T" out of the title
sad.gif

Billy
 
Guys, (Moderator Hat is off, so everything I say has no authority):

We all want the same end goal, though there are apparently differences on how to get there. We've spent the last 10 posts of a dead thread arguing how to do that. Let's let this thread die and continue working to the common goal of enjoying open lands to wheel.

I kindly ask you to PM each other if the conversation needs to continue. (Or come to Tim's shop this weekend, punch me in the face, drink a beer with me, and tell me why I am wrong. I promise to listen.)

Please, think of the children.

Josh "the_weirdo"
 
That's all well and good but you do realize that they also just make things up, right? Or they register on our boards and gain our confidence and then make posts that make us look bad.

Would you rather the OP and other members wheel in illegal areas and be photographed in those areas while sporting a NAXJA sticker because we were too scared the other side would take our warning posts out of context?

Billy

WFT, Billy? You really lost the point.
I am not even going to talk to your fist part, it is so far off the main point, and we can't control what they do, we can only control our own actions.

Why would anyone be scared to post responsibly? Here is how to post up about a closed area:
"That area is now closed, and unfortunately no OHV are allowed in that area any more."

Posting up how some people do that kind of stuff anyway, about the vanadium and all the other crap that we know goes on is stupid, we know about it but it hurts our fight to shine a light on it. A case in point, if I tell you "Do not think about Beer" what are you going to think about?

Josh, it is very clear this needs to be posted about, as our message needs to be one and the same. I may not be right, and feel free to poke holes in my thoughts. This is the way I have learned to post and be very responsible when talking about land issues in a public forum.
 
...
Why would anyone be scared to post responsibly? Here is how to post up about a closed area:
"That area is now closed, and unfortunately no OHV are allowed in that area any more."
...

How is that not a contradiction of:
No! Bad idea!!!!!

Stop it and delete it all!
...
and:
Not condoning it is still talking about it.
...
...even the posts "not condoning" it can be used to hurt us.

When Sean said:
maybe leaving ones that are not condoning it would be a good idea?
...
I was thinking that he meant, "Leave the parts that inform people that place is closed and we should not wheel there anymore."
dunno.gif


That's why I said:
...the part about the signs being ripped down constantly is a good thing for people to know.
...
Meaning, "People should know the place is closed to OHV and that they can't rely on signage or history." I'm still not sure if you...
A) Understood what I was trying to convey and took issue with the words I used
B) Understood what I was trying to convey but think we shouldn't speak of it at all
C) Did not understand what I was trying to convey and thought that my goal was to call attention to vandalism
D) None of the above

IMO, your fear of having posts taken out of context is absurd and it would be impossible to prevent. They could do the same damn thing with your posts...
we don't "Tread Lightly"
And even in your example of how to say it correctly!
OHV are allowed in that area

So, that brings us back to "Don't talk about it at all!":
...
A case in point, if I tell you "Do not think about Beer" what are you going to think about?
...
So, that's like the theory that if you have kids take a sex education class it's going to cause them to have sex? "Just don't talk about it and they won't do it!"
rolleyes.gif


...
Posting up that "we would Tread Lightly" is posting up that other times we don't "Tread Lightly"
...
Give me a friggin' break! And if you tell me to "Drive safe." that means that other times you want me to "Drive dangerously."? Having a "trail cleanup day" means every other day we throw garbage on the ground? Asking if there is a no trespassing sign means that if there isn't, it's you can do whatever you want? Saying "This club does not advocate illegal wheeling" means that other clubs do? And on and on and on. What "we would tread lightly" actually means is that the guy didn't know me from Adam and I wanted to assure him, since he was kind enough to let us drive on his property, we would act responsibly and considerately. (Oh wait! That means that if I'm on public land, I must be irresponsible and inconsiderate!)

If they want to make us look bad, they'll post something on our boards themselves, or they'll photo shop a quote that looks a whole helluva lot worse than any legitimately well meaning posts about why we SHOULDN'T do something illegal! it's not hard for them to do, and it's not even any less honest or moral... why wouldn't they?

And yes, I think there were things that should have been removed from this thread! Definitely!
...
We all get what we are not doing and what others are and what should and should not be done, but don't post about it!!!!!
Is more condoning than I ever meant to advocate!

And as Sean was trying to say earlier, even Josh's post should be removed.
...NAXJA does not condone wheeling in closed or illegal areas.
Several posts were removed for this reason.
...
He didn't mean any harm either, but you didn't jump all over him!

And Josh, no disrespect, but I think this does need to be discussed, and if I'm wrong, I want somebody to point it out. I don't think Letterman and I are going to see eye to eye; it's probably going to take somebody else jumping in. It's your call if you want to delete the thread, or maybe move it to the SC BOD forum so the enemy can't read it?

Billy
 
And Josh, no disrespect, but I think this does need to be discussed, and if I'm wrong, I want somebody to point it out. I don't think Letterman and I are going to see eye to eye; it's probably going to take somebody else jumping in. It's your call if you want to delete the thread, or maybe move it to the SC BOD forum so the enemy can't read it?

Billy

No disrespect taken. I agree that this topic absolutely needs to be discussed. I was just trying to save this guy's "Welcome to :NAXJA:" thread and open another one that we could discuss this topic in.

Anyway, what it comes down to is a choice. Is it better to:
a) delete all posts related to wheeling in illegal areas (both for and against) so that fewer of our posts and pictures can be used against us.
or
b) is it better to keep the posts in which people are called-out for wheeling in illegal areas to serve as notice that we police our own and don't tolerate illegal wheeling.
or
c) ???

When moderating this thread, I chose option A. My execution was less than stellar - I didn't realize that I cannot make posts disappear as I had planned (or at least I have not figured out how to do so yet). The best I can do is to remove their content (called a "soft delete") and give a reason. This left a huge trail of "illegal wheeling notes" and didn't clean up the thread as I had anticipated. The end goal of leaving no trace was not accomplished.

Though I prefer option A, I do see merit on both sides of the argument. My opinion is no-more and no-less correct than yours and I am always willing to listen to other opinions. At the very least, I have learned a better way to handle a similar situation in the future.

Josh "the_weirdo" :cheers:
 
Here's my opinion. Not saying I'm right but its just an opinion.

I think that it is acceptable to call it what it is in the open forum to educate those who are not in the know. I feel this way because it is unrealistic for anyone to believe that all 4wd owners instantly know what is acceptable behavior when it comes to off-road when the buy their jeep or sign up to post on a forum. Pretending like illegal wheeling never happens does nothing for our cause. But showing that this organization cares and actively educates its members to tread lightly and responsible four wheeling is what we should be doing. Attempting to delete any discussion of the subject may appear that we participate in the illegal activity and are trying to cover it up or cover up the actions of others.

That being said I do believe that there are cases where content should be deleted such as photos. This is because many people look at photos and don't read. If a photo is deleted it should state openly why it was deleted to educate others.
 
I am very sorry we will not see eye to eye on this subject, but I am done with it. I have spent way too much time fighting with people on our side about the correct way to project our selfs.

PM sent Billy!
 
the_weirdo said:
...
When moderating this thread, I chose option A. My execution was less than stellar - I didn't realize that I cannot make posts disappear as I had planned (or at least I have not figured out how to do so yet). The best I can do is to remove their content (called a "soft delete") and give a reason. This left a huge trail of "illegal wheeling notes" and didn't clean up the thread as I had anticipated. The end goal of leaving no trace was not accomplished.
...

Actually, you did do what you intended to do. The placeholders and reason for the soft delete are only visible to mods. The only trace of the old posts for most of us was your separate post that explained what you did.

And I totally understand the whole "moderating from your phone thing"! It was definitely better to delete everything and sort it out later. (This is the sorting it out part, right? :D)

Billy
 
Last edited:
Here's my opinion. Not saying I'm right but its just an opinion.

I think that it is acceptable to call it what it is in the open forum to educate those who are not in the know. I feel this way because it is unrealistic for anyone to believe that all 4wd owners instantly know what is acceptable behavior when it comes to off-road when the buy their jeep or sign up to post on a forum. Pretending like illegal wheeling never happens does nothing for our cause. But showing that this organization cares and actively educates its members to tread lightly and responsible four wheeling is what we should be doing. Attempting to delete any discussion of the subject may appear that we participate in the illegal activity and are trying to cover it up or cover up the actions of others.

That being said I do believe that there are cases where content should be deleted such as photos. This is because many people look at photos and don't read. If a photo is deleted it should state openly why it was deleted to educate others.

I agree. I think photos are much more sensative than text. A photo of you running over a tree on your own property may not be illegal, but it would be very easy to be mistaken for public land.

IMO, the difference between taking cropping off the "Don't" at the beginning of a sentence or the "is illegal" from the end and taking a photo out of context, is that the latter often happens without any malicious intent at all ("Cool Jeep!" right click->save as).

Thanks for the input,
Billy
 
start a new thread or keep this one no big deal
 
Back
Top