Weasel said:
Sorta what I was getting at. Often someone's defence or back up to their reasons don't make sence to us. So is that enough? Or does their backup have to make sence to us? Often it won't and I think you have to accept that and work with it if you want to help the other person expand and better justify their opinions. Tucking tail is fine if you learn something.
ok...lets clairfy for a bit.....she metions that punishment is NOT a deterant.
But in reality it is....if you have the attitude of a pacifist, please come out and say it. Stating hat we need to be "better" than we are now is a vague and inconclusive inuendo at best. Detail the reasons why you feel that way.
There was no conclusive support to any of her points which brings us back around to the public shcool system INDOCTRINATING kids these days.
It is painfully obvious that she doesn't know the reason behind her stance, just that it feels good and thats what counts.
Should we have placated Hilter and said "well..we shouldn't fight such a henious person? Afterall he did, for a fact, kill one out of every 3 JEWS onthe planet during his time.
What should we have done if not battled him?
Is it MORAL that we should let dicators who...
1. Kill their own people...
2. Starve them to death to meet there objectives?
Should we have let Pol Pot contiune?
Or should Stalin have had the right to kills hundreds of thousnads of Russian citizens?
Be honest. She has no idea where she stands. It;'s not that I disagree, I saimply ask for concrete ideas, other than just standing idley by and watching the world go by while millions of innocent people are being killed.
But therin lies another problem...the "better them than me" mentaility. It is abhortent that people can think like this.
Being a pacifist is a choice...but in the end she cannot come out and say yes I would defend myself to the death, becuase a pacifist believes ALL violence is wrong.
You cannot come out and say I think things are wrong with our government, without stating what you fell is wrong and what the problems really are. Canada is better? State your case as to why...
Throwing things out without being able to back them up is what our kids are learning...Maybe we should change our national anthem to "up with people".
Answer these questions little girl....and be SPECIFIC...
1. What should we have done with Adolf Hilter?
2. What should we do with the geoncide being perpatrated by Kim Jong Il in North Korea?
3. What should have been done with Pol Pot,or Mau Se Tung?
4. How about Sadam Hussien killing hundreds of thousands of people?
5. Should we let Hezbollah exist?
6. Should Ted Bundy, and John Wayne Gacey been allowed to live? How about Wesley Dodd?
I'm going to go out on a limb, but I would bet Jeeper Girl also believes in the Right to Choose. Yes or No?
If she is going to make a stance it needs to be specific. Not vauge, feel good hyperboli.
She has NOT been specific, which is all that has been asked of her.
Therfore I repeat...If you are going to have a stance...be clear, and concise.
She constantly said I'm done yet keeps coming back.
The need for attention is getting old and busted.
Prove that she hasen't been indoctrinated, becuase you damn well know that is the same kind of "I hate America" shit that comes from most teachers under the age of 60. Thank you NEA for your agenda...It has obviously paid off in spades.
?
