this is just a re-incarnation of the "clunker" bills of the late 80s...... hell, they didn't even change the F'in name!! they never went far but they wanted to allow grossly-polluting factories and corporations to buy old polluting cars to get them off the road, they would earn polution "credits" toward their factory emmisions. the entire muscle car enthusiast community totally freaked out.. as they are now.... as ANY reasonable person should be!!
this is a perfect case of an agenda item sitting on the back-burner for years until someone finds a way to sell it.
i bet if you dig deep enough, the auto manufacturers are using these "clunkers" as credit towards their battle with the EPA to show how much "good" they are doing for the environment by removing them from the streets.... political double-dipping at it's finest.
makes me sick..
in the mean time i am looking at the old ZJ with it's 2nd bad transmission thru a weary eye. it's a dam good thing i cant fit into most small jap-scrap..
if it wasn't for so many americans being ignorant and narrow-sighted for so many generations about the day-to-day issues that face us, the politicians wouldn't have such an easy time selling us a shit sandwich like this...
You know, I vaguely remember that nonsense from 20-25 years ago, and it made just as much sense then.
As far as an exchange, raise your hand if you can't "fit into small jap-scrap" like me. Come on - hands up! I know there's more than just me out there! I can sit in a Mini and look out over the windscreen. Did the same thing with a Corvette when I was working in a body shop as "strip/prep and general yard ape" (I was too big to be a monkey.) Good thing that 'Vette had T-tops, or I'd have had to stick my torso out the driver's side window.
I keep looking at these tiny cars that are coming out, and I feel like Bubba Smith sitting in a Honda Civic (recall
Police Academy?) I'd probably do better if the seats were removed totally and just put a pillow on the floor. I get so damned tired of banging my head on the roof while I'm driving (or banging my head on the doorsill just getting into the damned thing.)
Gang, "average" size is just that -
average. It's a mathematical average calculated from what is generally considered to be a represenatitive sample of the population, and even that is statistically suspect. I know
plenty of people who are well above average height/weight, and quite a few of them are even larger than me! Methinks they weren't included in the polling and the sampling, or the "average" would be somewhat higher.
I'm probably outside the "average range" - and I'm not really that large, at 6'3". I do know, however, that I'm off the top end of the range for effectiveniess of first-generation airbags (they top out being useful at something like 5'10", 200#. Taller than that risks whiplash fractures. I think the going range for first-gen airbags was 5'4"-5'10", 95#-200#. Outside that range, you were just as at risk for injury from the airbag as you were from the roads incident.)
I'm not so sure about second-gen airbags. They may have improved them for smaller/lighter people, but they'd still have difficulty with us larger specimens I'm sure.
A lot of this sort of thing contributes to why I do
not want a new car. ABS? I learned to drive without it, and I actually find it limiting at times. Vehicle active anti-roll? Screws up my reactions - I can't feel the road as well as I should. Speed-sensitive steering? Unpredictable, generally (working with fixed-rate steering simplifies calculating how things are going to happen.)
Driver training probably started to go downhill about the time these 'features' became commonplace - I haven't tracked the trend, but it seems likely. "Build a car any idiot can drive, and every idiot will drive one." I've been saying that for at least fifteen years, and it probably should have been taken as prophecy (vice cynicism.)