CRASH
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Foresthill, CA
ashmanjeepxj said:I know your not done, neither am I (no triangulation yet), but mine will have LOADS of trangles, x-s, and gussets when done.
1.5 x .120" tube weighs 1.769 lb./ft. Every bit of tube you add encourages the rollover you are trying to avoid. I'm using 095 wall tube in strategic locations for just this reason.
Every design is a compromise. I fully understand that. I am planning for a family, and this design is built with that, as well as my other interests in mind. It is primarily a cage designed under a theory of the existing chassis acting upon a ladder structure that is very stiff by its nature.
Are there better designs out there from a full rock-racing perspective? Absolutely. I would have lost the roof halo entirely, moved all the tubes inside, and triangulated the piss out of it. Where would that leave me when wifey needed to get to a little munchkin in the back seat?
The biggest problem I have seen in cage design is the tendency to create a jungle gym of tube that only adds marginal amounts of chassis stiffness and rigidity. Super rigidity is great for a strictly rock raced rig, it helps it live longer. Add too much, and the rig becomes a danger on the highway to it's occupants, as the shock loading is transferred directly to the passengers, with no chassis give whatever.
I seek a balance of chassis stiffness, increased occupant safety, and occupant convenience. This balance is not the same for everyone, and in fact, I'm sure it varies widely among users of this BBS. Time will tell if URF 001 achieves this balance for my family's interests.
Andy