blondejoncherokee
NAXJA Member
- Location
- sacramento
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-363606.html
so there seems to be no actual law against beadlocks, manafacturers choose to not use the DOT stamp most likely due to the fact that if some idiot doesnt properly torque them down then they dont want to be responsible and get sued(no one from DOT comes and inspects anythign , ever, there are merely standards that manufacturers must follow if they choose to use the DOT approved stamp )
beadlocks are really stronger and safer in many ways. more likely to stay together in a crash also, most cops will let you go if you show them the DOT approved part on your rims.
quote:
"I searched the CA Vehicle code and safety and basically did not find anything on beadlocks. I most likely suck at searching, but went through the California vehicle code, DOT and NITSA, and did not find anything on beadlocks.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/vc/vc.htm
and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Highway Safety Desk Book:
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/enforce/deskbk.html#PMVI
Additional info:
Frame and floor height:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc24008_5.htm
Fenders and mudguards:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc27600.htm
headlamps:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc24400.htm
Cornering lamps on fenders:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc25107.htm
on the other hand, he could have cited me for this as my tires are grooved:
27461. No person shall cause or permit the operation of and no driver shall knowingly operate any motor vehicle except a commercial vehicle, on any street or highway, which is equipped with one or more recut or regrooved tires. For purposes of this section a recut or regrooved tire is an unretreaded or unrecapped tire into which new grooves have been cut or burned.
"
so there seems to be no actual law against beadlocks, manafacturers choose to not use the DOT stamp most likely due to the fact that if some idiot doesnt properly torque them down then they dont want to be responsible and get sued(no one from DOT comes and inspects anythign , ever, there are merely standards that manufacturers must follow if they choose to use the DOT approved stamp )
beadlocks are really stronger and safer in many ways. more likely to stay together in a crash also, most cops will let you go if you show them the DOT approved part on your rims.
quote:
"I searched the CA Vehicle code and safety and basically did not find anything on beadlocks. I most likely suck at searching, but went through the California vehicle code, DOT and NITSA, and did not find anything on beadlocks.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/vc/vc.htm
and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Highway Safety Desk Book:
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/enforce/deskbk.html#PMVI
Additional info:
Frame and floor height:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc24008_5.htm
Fenders and mudguards:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc27600.htm
headlamps:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc24400.htm
Cornering lamps on fenders:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc25107.htm
on the other hand, he could have cited me for this as my tires are grooved:
27461. No person shall cause or permit the operation of and no driver shall knowingly operate any motor vehicle except a commercial vehicle, on any street or highway, which is equipped with one or more recut or regrooved tires. For purposes of this section a recut or regrooved tire is an unretreaded or unrecapped tire into which new grooves have been cut or burned.
"