High capacity mags are my biggest issue... theres no legit use for 90 round ar15 mags, or 30 round glock mags. Not for hunting, not for plinking, not for self defense.
.
Sure there is. A 'militia' should be able at any time to make a solid stand against any tyrant large or small.
Now i know im gonna hear something about out dated this or that. But keeping it strictly legal, what is the arguement against it. If someone decides against large capacity for me. They are infringing on my right to participate in the neccessary militia. as being limited in my armorment limits my ability to fullfil that task effectively.
So to fight that aspect you need to remember that you have to make it legal AND still abide by the constitution.
Secondly, in district of columbia v. heller (2008) precedent was set by the supreme court that even outside of the bounds of militia, the second amendment protected individual rights to use fire arms for otherwise lawful use(in the home or self defense)
The case also held that prefatory claus as interpreted by the court stemmed from concern for the fed gov disarming its citizens, therefore eliminating the militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule...eliminating the concept of militia all together - which ties the 2nd amendment....
So now you need to make a law that still is agreeable with being constitutional, but you also have to overturn precedent.
Any bill presented will undoubtedly cross both lines, will be argued and cases will end up in SCOTUS, where history will undoubtedly be made.
This whole scenario the US finds itself in as of late is not the end, the beggining of the end, but the end of the begining.
