Abortion

I'm starting a drinking game, every time someone applies the word socialist or communist to something completely unrelated I will take a shot.
That's an awfully communist means of supporting our socialist alcohol companies in their pinko (does that count) agenda to have us all behaving like a bunch of drunk Soviets, you damn dirty commie.
 
I think it was a mistake starting the game while still at work. Hope he didn't drive the 5 ton to work...drunk 5 ton driver? Yikes!:eek:
 
no alcohol on company property. I'm keeping a running total for when I get home.
 
yeah, it's enough to make me want to kill a million babies :smsoap:
 
Socialist babies?
In which case there's a monument that reflects your sentiment.

tumblr_ktgbvrcGFV1qz5njko1_400.jpg
 
You assume that your opinions upset me……. my skin is way too thick for that to happen.

Abstinence and education are key components to reducing/eliminating abortions……except that our government made it legal, so tolerance = acceptance. “It must be OK to kill babies, the government made it legal.” Your example of Romania only proves this point.


Not Socialists, you say? Here’s some pesky facts this I like to call proof:

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood and devout Socialist:

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race
(Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)


Planned Parenthood collected $349.6 million in government grants and contracts in 2008, and at the end of the year had $85 million in profits. For the slow folk, grant funds come from tax payer dollars.


Here’s another disturbing tidbit of factual data:

Planned Parenthood has targeted African-American communities across the country, building large abortion facilities in black neighborhoods.

Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of eugenics. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the eugenics movement sought to "improve" the human species and preserve racial "purity" through planned human breeding.

Sanger wrote in a letter dated December 10, 1939: “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Sanger wrote the comment as a part of her collaboration in The Negro Project.

The following information shows how a black child is 2.33 more times likely to be killed in the womb than a white child:

The CDC Abortion Surveillance Report states that:

White women have 167 abortions for every 1,000 live births.
Black women have 503 abortions for every 1,000 live births.
Thus,

A child conceived of a black woman has a 33.4% chance of being killed in the womb.

A child conceived of a white woman has a 14.3% chance of being killed in the womb.

Thus,

A black child is 2.33 times more likely to be killed in the womb than a white child.

 
You assume that your opinions upset me……. my skin is way too thick for that to happen.
Dense is more like it.




Abstinence and education are key components to reducing/eliminating abortions……except that our government made it legal, so tolerance = acceptance. “It must be OK to kill babies, the government made it legal.” Your example of Romania only proves this point.
No, my Romanian example countered your point.
If you can't get that right it makes me wonder how you may-have skewed your other points.





Not Socialists, you say? Here’s some pesky facts this I like to call proof:

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood and devout Socialist:

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race
(Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
Century year old proof is great. It's right up there with hiding under a desk during that impending a-bomb attack, smoking while exercising to stay trim, and keeping the black man down.




Planned Parenthood collected $349.6 million in government grants and contracts in 2008, and at the end of the year had $85 million in profits. For the slow folk, grant funds come from tax payer dollars.
Isn't making profit a capitalist concept?
Of coarse, if what you said is true than I have a simple fix. Cut the grants, and redistribute the money to educate the youth about the hazards of pregnancy within schools.




Here’s another disturbing tidbit of factual data:

Planned Parenthood has targeted African-American communities across the country, building large abortion facilities in black neighborhoods.

Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of eugenics. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the eugenics movement sought to "improve" the human species and preserve racial "purity" through planned human breeding.

Sanger wrote in a letter dated December 10, 1939: “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Sanger wrote the comment as a part of her collaboration in The Negro Project.
That sounds more like fascism than socialism.



The following information shows how a black child is 2.33 more times likely to be killed in the womb than a white child:

The CDC Abortion Surveillance Report states that:

White women have 167 abortions for every 1,000 live births.
Black women have 503 abortions for every 1,000 live births.
Thus,

A child conceived of a black woman has a 33.4% chance of being killed in the womb.

A child conceived of a white woman has a 14.3% chance of being killed in the womb.

Thus,

A black child is 2.33 times more likely to be killed in the womb than a white child.


Socioeconomics wouldn't have anything to do with any of those numbers would it? (sarcasm)
 
$349.6 Million Dollars of tax payer money went to abortions?

Like 50 trillion dollars go to Wel-fare right now? So.. we ditch the $349.6Mil and just give welfare another 90 trillion..

GREAT IDEA BOB!
 
I thought Planned Parenthood was a non profit organization. :dunno: And obviously if they're able to run an $85 million profit, they don't need nearly as much in federal funding, do they?
 
Century year old proof is great. It's right up there with hiding under a desk during that impending a-bomb attack, smoking while exercising to stay trim, and keeping the black man down.

Sanger opened the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau and the American Birth Control League. The two organizations subsequently merge, and later become Planned Parenthood® Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA®).

In 2009, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America awarded Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with the Margaret Sanger Award, which is presented annually to recognize leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement.

Please stop hitting yourself.......



Isn't making profit a capitalist concept?

Tax-payer subsidized organizations = Socialism, not Capitalism.


Of coarse, if what you said is true than I have a simple fix.
Cut the grants AGREED

And hold parents responsible and accountable for educating their kids about sex. Sex education provided by the schools a byproduct of parental irresponsibility.
 
Sanger opened the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau and the American Birth Control League. The two organizations subsequently merge, and later become Planned Parenthood® Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA®).

In 2009, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America awarded Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with the Margaret Sanger Award, which is presented annually to recognize leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement.

Hey. I'm not saying it's right, but sometimes good things can happen from terrible people. The German WWII V2 rocket programs helped put an American on the moon. Margaret Sanger's eugenics theories make me think she was her era's biggest douchebag (well next to stalin, hitler and company); moreso, I would not create an award in her name, BUT it doesn't change the fact that reproductive health and womens rights are valid issues in 2010.


And hold parents responsible and accountable for educating their kids about sex. Sex education provided by the schools a byproduct of parental irresponsibility..
Ah yes, but why is that? There used be a time where one parent earned enough to provide for their entire family, so kids always had access to at least one adult role model at any given point in time. Nowadays, everybody's chasing the almighty buck while kids are left to their own devices. Throw in an entire industry that sees kids as consumers, and you just compounded the problem.
 
Hey. I'm not saying it's right, but sometimes good things can happen from terrible people. The German WWII V2 rocket programs helped put an American on the moon. Margaret Sanger's eugenics theories make me think she was her era's biggest douchebag (well next to stalin, hitler and company); moreso, I would not create an award in her name, BUT it doesn't change the fact that reproductive health and womens rights are valid issues in 2010.



Ah yes, but why is that? There used be a time where one parent earned enough to provide for their entire family, so kids always had access to at least one adult role model at any given point in time. Nowadays, everybody's chasing the almighty buck while kids are left to their own devices. Throw in an entire industry that sees kids as consumers, and you just compounded the problem.

Seems like both problems are controlled by personal responsibility and accountability, including fiscal responsibility.
 
Hey. I'm not saying it's right, but sometimes good things can happen from terrible people. The German WWII V2 rocket programs helped put an American on the moon. Margaret Sanger's eugenics theories make me think she was her era's biggest douchebag (well next to stalin, hitler and company); moreso, I would not create an award in her name, BUT it doesn't change the fact that reproductive health and womens rights are valid issues in 2010.



Ah yes, but why is that? There used be a time where one parent earned enough to provide for their entire family, so kids always had access to at least one adult role model at any given point in time. Nowadays, everybody's chasing the almighty buck while kids are left to their own devices. Throw in an entire industry that sees kids as consumers, and you just compounded the problem.
We make it on just my income with three kids. It's all about being responsible. We drive a 2003 Caravan that we bought in 08, I have my XJ that gets built out of tax refund money, we bought an $85k house on 5 acres that needs a little work, etc etc. Stop chasing the almighty buck and life gets a lot easier.
 
We make it on just my income with three kids. It's all about being responsible. We drive a 2003 Caravan that we bought in 08, I have my XJ that gets built out of tax refund money, we bought an $85k house on 5 acres that needs a little work, etc etc. Stop chasing the almighty buck and life gets a lot easier.

I don't have any kids, and my life is a lot easier because of it. I do what I want when I want and have more than enough money to buy everything I want. So if my girl accidentally got pregnant at our age and this time in our lives the choice for us both would be a no brainer.

Everyone has different ideas of what happiness is and ours is not little kids running around when we ourselves are still living our own lives.
 
Back
Top