In all honesty if I have unloaded a full mag & didn't hit my target, I need to either quit carrying or stop putting myself in a situation that I am gonna need to reload. I don't even carry extra rounds when I carry the 357. I really see no need.
I'd say you'll never have a problem with this in a normal scenario. Even if there are 2 guys, you're likely to not have to take more than 2 shots. Even if the first 2 are right one top of each other. That second guy is probably gonna have to change his pants.
when i bought my Springfield i put 84 rounds threw it and kept 16 for home protection, that's all i have shot since i was 17. im still pretty sure that if someone i didn't want was inside my house at least one of those 16 would land inside him.
This is fine provided you have clear mindset, good vision and 100% knowledge that he's not working alone.
and i try tp stay the hell out of IN if i can
Cause Indiana is so much worse than Illinois? Excuse me while I chuckle.
I'd take that bet. Getting murdered with your own pistol would suck.
That it would. I did see something the other day though. Some line about "I'd rather be murdered with my own pistol than not have the chance to defend myself." Hell, I'd rather just not get murdered at all!
well when i did go shooting, i was aiming at a target 20 yards away with 16 in the pistol, 1st time shooting since i was 17, and all 16 hit the little man on the paper. the way my house is, an intruder coming in any door in my house would only be 10/12ft away from me, so i think i could hit the intruder.
im not saying i don't need more practice, i defiantly do. i am not nearly experienced enough to know at all whats happens when the thing im aiming at is not a piece of paper.
My main concern and reason to want to practice and be precise, is efficient defense. It could hurt you really badly in a court case if you "spray and pray", come up with 3 hits in non-vital areas, the guy lives and then sues you. The law here requires you to shoot to stop and only if no lesser force will do. (They give you the benefit of the doubt by saying the judgement of no lesser force was made before shooting. For instance: even if you find out later that the "gun" he had was a water pistol, you didn't know that beforehand.) It's a slippery slope to throw a mag at someone.
I want to take defensive courses for moving, reloading and making myself better at surviving, not in the case of a single or pair of attackers. I am concerned with at some point in the future having a complete meltdown of western civilization. COMWEC, if you will. If the country is left to it's own devices and has to survive without law, there are going to be people and families wiped out because of a lack of self defense skills and tools. If a band of marauders wants to take my food, they're gonna have to come through a wall of bullets and I'm going to be better at it than they are.
Is it a little extreme? Maybe. Is it impossible? No.
XJosh 'Not a crazy prepper, just a prepper' 95