who ya voting for?

[Darky]

Why would that make me angry? He screws up words sometimes, so do I, so do you. Look at any public speaker's record and see if they have never made a mistake or said something that didn't make sense. It gets tiresome when people have to continually resort to picking on someone's speaking ability. Its like me picking on people's spelling in here. Its fun, but doesn't prove anything.

 

[red91]

Why would that make me angry? He screws up words sometimes, so do I, so do you. Look at any public speaker's record and see if they have never made a mistake or said something that didn't make sense. It gets tiresome when people have to continually resort to picking on someone's speaking ability. Its like me picking on people's spelling in here. Its fun, but doesn't prove anything.

UHM...It does prove one thing. Someone needs to proof read that crap first. But other than that...

And we KNOW you have spell check.CHEATER.

 

[Osprey413]

Did you read "George W. Bush's Resume" at the end of his quote section?

 

[Darky]

Here's Kerry's resume: John Forbes Kerry's Resume

 

[red91]

Here's Kerry's resume: John Forbes Kerry's Resume

I smell something burning...in the immortal words of the fantastic 4 ( FLAME ON! )

Edit: I am not participating, condoning, being a party to, or in any other way shape or form, inciting a flame war. :shhh:

 

[Darky]

No flaming, except maybe of the candidates...btw the resume for Bush is just as much liberal crap propaganda as you'll say the Kerry resume is conservative crap propaganda. But both are based on things that they've done in the past. If Bush did drugs in his past, oh well. A huge majority of people I know did drugs at one point but that doesn't make them bad people, it makes them typical people who are going to "rebel" against whatever or get pressured or whatever reason. I think a more telling thing is what the person's beliefs have been that can actually be shown and proven beyond conjecture (He made his money in oil and that's all he went to Iraq for, etc).

 

[red91]

No flaming, except maybe of the candidates...btw the resume for Bush is just as much liberal crap propaganda as you'll say the Kerry resume is conservative crap propaganda. But both are based on things that they've done in the past. If Bush did drugs in his past, oh well. A huge majority of people I know did drugs at one point but that doesn't make them bad people, it makes them typical people who are going to "rebel" against whatever or get pressured or whatever reason. I think a more telling thing is what the person's beliefs have been that can actually be shown and proven beyond conjecture (He made his money in oil and that's all he went to Iraq for, etc).

CON-JEC-TURE. Great your using those big words again. Rules say 2 syllables or less.

 

[Yucca-Man]

CON-JEC-TURE. Great your using those big words again. Rules say 2 syllables or less.

Syllables = three of those word sounds in that same word - you lose. Get back, do it again! :nono:

 

[BIGSLVRXJ]

Not that Im old enough to vote but if I was mine would be going to Bush. My whole family is Republican and I plan to be as well.

 

[Yucca-Man]

Not that Im old enough to vote but if I was mine would be going to Bush. My whole family is Republican and I plan to be as well.

I would encourage voting not by party affiliation but by the candidate's record and position (if they have one). There are many better ways to choose where to place your vote than simply by the -R or -D after the name...glad to hear you're planning to vote when you can though!

 

[red91]

I would encourage voting not by party affiliation but by the candidate's record and position (if they have one). There are many better ways to choose where to place your vote than simply by the -R or -D after the name...glad to hear you're planning to vote when you can though!

yeah ne to. In Washington for the Primaries that have made a law, currently being challenged, that you have to vote for your party affiliation strait across.

What a bunch of BULL.

 

[red91]

CON-JEC-TURE-ING. Great your using those big words again. Rules say 2 syllables or less.

 

[red91]

CON-JEC-TURE-ING. Great your using those big words again. Rules say 3 syllables or less.

Fixed it Yucca. Now who's the little guy on your web site, and how is he doing since you haven't responded. :nono:

 

[jml1911a1]

Don't know if this was posted anywhere else in this thread, but here it is...

Why you should waste your vote this election!


Read up!

 

[Urban Redneck]

Funny...all the quotes on that web site are from bleeding heart libs...go figure.

 

[Gridikal]

Why would that make me angry? He screws up words sometimes, so do I, so do you. Look at any public speaker's record and see if they have never made a mistake or said something that didn't make sense. It gets tiresome when people have to continually resort to picking on someone's speaking ability. Its like me picking on people's spelling in here. Its fun, but doesn't prove anything.

lol- hay, we all spel just fyne

 

[G.Q. Jeeper]

Not going to get into too much detail, I learned from the last thread what can happen, so here is another opinion from "Canadian Guy" LOL (I like that one!!)

Since this is = (North American) it includes Mexico and Canada, which are not fans of Bush or the War in Iraq, and hope the US starts working with the world, soon.

I came accross this site, some may take offence to it, others may learn from it, take a look and see for yourself....

btw, in our last election (Federal) are topics were health care, pot smoking (decriminalization of it) and gay marriages, not bad, all we have to do is cover the LCBO = Liqour Control Board of Ontario (which is the second largest booze business in the world) and we are all set LOL.....

take a lookie:

http://www.isometry.com/usahate.html

GQ

 

[Ed A. Stevens]

Since this is = (North American) it includes Mexico and Canada, which are not fans of Bush or the War in Iraq, and hope the US starts working with the world, soon.GQ

When the USA kicks the UN out of New York, you can make a legitimate claim that US fails to work with the world. The UN voted to apply pressure to remove the old government of Iraq, and the US lead 30 nations into the military action.

The US works with the world, despite what some people believe, and some nations in the world do not want to work with the USA (on many issues). Right now the non-players opposing support of government change in Iraq are France and Germany, not a complete boycott by the world (most non-participants are neutral). Winning the favor of these two opposition countries is very likely to result in alienating more than two other countries (participants and neutrals). We gain very little on the world stage by pandering to these "powerful" detractors, at the expense of other supporters and neutrals.

When you separate those opposing war, any war, from those opposing the USA policy of pre-emptive action against terrorism, the fans of USA cooperation and policy quickly grow in size. Many more neutrals favor USA policy and join the active opposition to terrorism.

You are lucky, in that Canada only has a controversial history of removing the children from citizens they deem unfit for inclusion into society. They have very few international conflicts to concern them, only domestic concerns.

 

[Sarge]

I came accross this site, some may take offence to it, others may learn from it, take a look and see for yourself....

take a lookie:

http://www.isometry.com/usahate.html

GQ

Oh and that's a very factual website...not. We can and do work with the world. Working with the world does not mean we have to all act and think alike tho. Why should we give up our national identity to satisify everyone else? If we were to require that of anyone it would cause a big stink and much more hatred but it's ok for everyone else to wish it for us.

Sarge

 

[Urban Redneck]

When Canada finishes building their monument to long haired draft dodging hippies. Peace through superior firepower.