Last edited:
xjohnnyc said:It's a sticky situation.
sorry, somebody had to say it
xjohnnyc said:It's a sticky situation.
sorry, somebody had to say it
cracker said:Done!
Here are the threads I removed from 'sticky' status
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=58878
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=91331
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=54448
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=930667
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=928663
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=921240
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=931441
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=931172
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=929987
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=43690
cracker said:
karstic said:WTF put you in charge?
karstic said:WTF put you in charge?
yeah right...cracker said:In charge? Not me. The SoCal chapter members govern its own chapter forum as they see fit. All that is requested that tech be left out unless chapter (regionally) related. This is not a National BOD intervention but as a SoCal chapter member with the ability to make changes. It has been discussed in the past with our current SoCal BOD Pres and mentioned to the VP that I would moderate on occasion and I can assure you my meddling with the forum is only under unique circumstances.![]()
I see that Cracker copied the post I made without missing anythingrpraterxj said:Speaking of stickies....
Is it possible to have the candidates' post for the BOD election to be temp sticky?
This will allow folks to have them accessible for the next couple of weeks. Replies and questions can be seen more easily.
The election is extremely important and needs the extra attention.
Thank you!
Kejtar said:I see that Cracker copied the post I made without missing anythingThere is a link from each candidate's name and they are accesible from within this post: http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=931504