Socialist Playbook-this isn't about politics, it's about overthrowing the USA.

 
makes me chuckle every time I see it.

And I can't decide which side is which :roll:
 
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAna...108151901/Regulatory-Agencies-Staffing-Up.htm

"If the federal government's regulatory operation were a business, it would be one of the 50 biggest in the country in terms of revenues, and the third largest in terms of employees, with more people working for it than McDonald's, Ford, Disney and Boeing combined."

Employment at these agencies has climbed 13% since Obama took office to more than 281,000, while private-sector jobs shrank by 5.6%.

Federal regulations added to date under the Obama Admin are the largest in history.

The Small Business Administration found that small companies spend 36% more per employee to comply with these rules than larger firms, a total $1.75 Trillion per year.

Who is the SBA?

Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms.
Employ just over half of all private sector employees.
Pay 44 percent of total U.S. private payroll.
Have generated 64 percent of net new jobs over the past 15 years.
Create more than half of the nonfarm private gross domestic product (GDP).
Hire 40 percent of high tech workers (such as scientists, engineers, and computer programmers).
Are 52 percent home-based and 2 percent franchises.
Made up 97.3 percent of all identified exporters and produced 30.2 percent of the known export value in FY 2007

OK, help me out here.......

Adding regulation costs to the businesses that employ over half of all private sector jobs (non-taxpayer funded) will help our economy in what way?

Adding employees to regulatory agencies which in turn, requires more tax-payer dollars to pay their salaries helps our economy in what way?

The government has no money that it first doesn't take from someone else, so how can a private sector workforce that shrinks by 5.6% (and the associated tax revenue loss) support tax-payer funded jobs that increase by 13%?

Obviously the Obama Admin isn't doing the math, or is it that they think that ya'll are too stupid to figure this out for yourself?

Hope they don't notice the Change......as we fundamentally transform the USA and enslave the masses.

:patriot:
 
NewsAndAnal....

:laugh2:
 
While in China this week, US VP Joe Biden congratulated Sichuan University for counting "amongst its alumni some of the most illustrious figures in recent Chinese history." He then hailed Sichuan's late graduate Zhu De as "one of the most illustrious figures and a founding father of the republic."

Zhu De, in fact, was the commander of the People's Liberation Army and a full partner with Chairman Mao in transforming the world's most populous nation into a communist dictatorship. "Zhu De was one of the most important members of the CPC's first generation of leading collective with Mao Zedong at the core," says the Communist Party of China Encyclopedia.


Biden is sucking up to the Chinese by praising their leaders who were instrumental in establishing Communism and destroying the God-given rights of the Chinese people. Hope those of you who elected this jackass are getting your money’s worth……
 
Biden is sucking up to the Chinese by praising their leaders who were instrumental in establishing Communism and destroying the God-given rights of the Chinese people. Hope those of you who elected this jackass are getting your money’s worth…


Could it be he is just being gracious to his host?

I am being lazy, the below is cut-n-pasted from wikipedia, but after 13 years of war I don't believe the Chinese people really had many God given rights left to destroy.

"On 1 January 1912, the Republic of China was established, heralding the end of the Qing Dynasty. Sun Yat-sen of the Kuomintang (the KMT or Nationalist Party) was proclaimed provisional president of the republic. However, the presidency was later given to Yuan Shikai, a former Qing general, who had ensured the defection of the entire Beiyang Army from the Qing Empire to the revolution. In 1915, Yuan proclaimed himself Emperor of China but was forced to abdicate and return the state to a republic when he realized it was an unpopular move, not only with the population but also with his own Beiyang Army and its commanders.

After Yuan Shikai's death in 1916, China was politically fragmented, with an internationally recognized but virtually powerless national government seated in Peking (Beijing). Warlords in various regions exercised actual control over their respective territories. In the late 1920s, the Kuomintang, under Chiang Kai-shek, was able to reunify the country under its own control, moving the nation's capital to Nanking (Nanjing) and implementing "political tutelage", an intermediate stage of political development outlined in Sun Yat-sen's program for transforming China into a modern, democratic state. Effectively, political tutelage meant one-party rule by the Kuomintang.

The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) (part of World War II) forced an uneasy alliance between the Nationalists and the Communists as well as causing around 20 million Chinese civilian deaths.[46] The Japanese 'three-all policy' in north China — "kill all, burn all and destroy all", was one example of wartime atrocities committed on a civilian population.[47] With the surrender of Japan in 1945, China emerged victorious but financially drained. The continued distrust between the Nationalists and the Communists led to the resumption of the Chinese Civil War. In 1947, constitutional rule was established, but because of the ongoing Civil War many provisions of the ROC constitution were never implemented in mainland China."
 
Last edited:
Could it be he is just being gracious to his host?

I am thinking the same thing.

Chairman Mao is revered as a hero to the Chinese people. [FACT ;) ]
 
Last edited:
plus wouldn't god share everything in the world equally among his people? you know, kinda like commie/socialism? in the kingdom of heaven we are all equal, just sayin
 
You can make the same assertions about the Germans under Hitler......Heil or Auschwitz, you choose.

Not an assertion. I am married to a Chinese ;)

My wife says Mao is to Chinese as George Washington is the America.

Biden is sucking up to the Chinese by praising their leaders who were instrumental in establishing Communism and destroying the God-given rights of the Chinese people. Hope those of you who elected this jackass are getting your money’s worth……

My wife has no understanding as to why you would say this. Zhu De and Chairman Mao are very important to the Chinese people. For Biden, or any leader, to go there and insult either of these men would be inflamatory beyond belief. It would be like Hu Jin Tao coming here to the US and insulting Ab Lincoln or George Washington.
 
Last edited:
Not an assertion. I am married to a Chinese ;)

My wife says Mao is to Chinese as George Washington is the America.



My wife has no understanding as to why you would say this. Zhu De and Chairman Mao are very important to the Chinese people. For Biden, or any leader, to go there and insult either of these men would be inflamatory beyond belief. It would be like Hu Jin Tao coming here to the US and insulting Ab Lincoln or George Washington.

Curious, was your wife born and raised in China?
 
Curious, was your wife born and raised in China?

Yes and has now been here for almost 18 years as a proud American. :patriot:

She also has a history degree and a psychology, speaks four languages, and reads any book she can get her hands on about history.

It was funny when I mentioned Zhu De to her, her immediate response was 'he was a good man with a big heart.' :rof:
 
I'm glad she was able to escape the oppressive Commuist China regime and allowed to enjoy her God-given rights and freedoms more fully here in the US.

Where did she earn her history degree and what was the focus?

And since she is fluent in Chinese, she will clearly recognize the term loagai. http://www.laogai.org/

slide5.jpg


Since she likes to read, here are a couple of great reads by Hongda Harry Wu.

  • Bitter Winds chronicles the nineteen years the Wu spent in Mao’s forced labor camp, the likes of which still exist today.
  • In Troublemaker, Wu shares how he used his experiences as a prisoner to help educate US and other world leaders on Communist China’s continued exploitation of their people in prison-based forced labor manufacturing, re-education, human organ harvesting, gender engineering (forced infanticide), etc.
I find it hard to believe that one could honestly find parallel with Mao and George Washington, especially when one compares the fruits of their labors, which are polar opposites.
 
Last edited:
I'm glad she was able to escape the oppressive Commuist China regime and allowed to enjoy her God-given rights and freedoms more fully here in the US.

Where did she earn her history degree and what was the focus?

And since she is fluent in Chinese, she will clearly recognize the term loagai. http://www.laogai.org/

slide5.jpg


Since she likes to read, here are a couple of great reads by Hongda Harry Wu.

  • Bitter Winds chronicles the nineteen years the Wu spent in Mao’s forced labor camp, the likes of which still exist today.
  • In Troublemaker, Wu shares how he used his experiences as a prisoner to help educate US and other world leaders on Communist China’s continued exploitation of their people in prison-based forced labor manufacturing, re-education, human organ harvesting, gender engineering (forced infanticide), etc.
I find it hard to believe that one could honestly find parallel with Mao and George Washington, especially when one compares the fruits of their labors, which are polar opposites.

Escape? :laugh2: (that is her laughing at you).

You are arguing the 'right' vs. 'wrong' of it. That is not the point. Whether or not one agrees, Mao is considered a hero by the Chinese despite what had happened. Zhu De is generally considered a 'good man' to the people of the Chinese.

Regardless of your thoughts, beliefs, or thoughts on how things 'should' be, the Chinese (in general) see these as their heroes even if they may have been 'brainwashed' into thinking so. (I don't think they were 'brain washed' but Mao and Zhu De came at a tumultuous time in China's history and brought order and for that they are revered highly.)

To send a diplomat to China and not respect their beliefs would be completely disruptive and insulting. It would be like me going to a Mormon church and not respecting your beliefs while I am there.
 
Escape? :laugh2: (that is her laughing at you).

You are arguing the 'right' vs. 'wrong' of it. That is not the point. Whether or not one agrees, Mao is considered a hero by the Chinese despite what had happened. Zhu De is generally considered a 'good man' to the people of the Chinese.

Regardless of your thoughts, beliefs, or thoughts on how things 'should' be, the Chinese (in general) see these as their heroes even if they may have been 'brainwashed' into thinking so. (I don't think they were 'brain washed' but Mao and Zhu De came at a tumultuous time in China's history and brought order and for that they are revered highly.)

To send a diplomat to China and not respect their beliefs would be completely disruptive and insulting. It would be like me going to a Mormon church and not respecting your beliefs while I am there.

I disagree. The right vs wrong of it IS the point.

Tolerance of the actions of the leaders of Communist China are viewed as acceptance. Biden didn’t have to make it a point to praise Zhu De, he could have said nothing about him and still shown respect of the culture. Those who were in agreement with Mao’s policies though he was great and did wonderful things for the country. No news flash there.

Praising Zhu De and Mao only shows acceptance for their establishment of the Communist Party and all of the collateral effects of their actions. It also shows the people of China the US leaders are willing to turn their head to the atrocities that are perpetrated against the Chinese people.

Mao Zedong, the first CCP leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), put it bluntly by saying, “What can Emperor Qin Shihuang brag about? He only killed 460 Confucian scholars, but we killed 46,000 intellectuals. There are people who accuse us of practicing dictatorship like Emperor Qin Shihuang and we admit it all. It fits the reality. It is a pity that they did not give us enough credit, so we need to add to it.”

If imprisoning people, torturing them and executing them because they disagree with the government’s policies isn’t a barbaric form of brainwashing, care to provide another definition?

Moa was a great guy, in fact, he killed more people than Stalin and Hiltler combined. Greatest killer in the 20th Century. I call that evil, not bad policy.

Currently, the US Government is beholden to China because of our indebtedness and shows a lack of integrity in upholding the US Constitution, Biden’s “diplomatic” actions are proof. Our Founding Fathers warned of this, but these warnings have gone unheeded.
 
Back
Top