Socialist Playbook-this isn't about politics, it's about overthrowing the USA.

Isn't that apples vs oranges? I believe the measuring criteria for unemployment was changed...something about either counting or not counting the military and only counting those on unemployment insurance.
 
Let me know when you figure that out Tom.....regardless of the jobless stats, the massive increase in spending of borrowed money is the real point.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7w3ZEbC09k


Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act:
'(b) Assimilating Reserve Corp Officers Into the Regular Corps- Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.
'(c) Purpose and Use of Ready Research-
'(2) USES- The Ready Reserve Corps shall--
'(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;
'(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;
'(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and
'(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved communities (as defined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.
'(d) Funding- For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and $12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for the Ready Reserve Corps.'

This unit will fall under the orders of Barack Obama and of course there is no Constitutional basis to this authority. The states use the National Guard (state militia) to handle emergencies, and obviously, this give the president more power over the states. It also may provide power for the president to force all Americans into vaccinations and other medical treatments using the words national emergency.
Some fear doctors who plan on leaving the profession due to the Obamacare mandates will be forced into service. Remember the force will respond on short notice to "routine public health and emergency response missions," even involuntarily.

This healthcare bill also sets up the start of the civilian military force Obama announce during the campaign on July 2, 2008.


"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," he said. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." 2008 Presidental candidate- Barack Obama

A huge concern to the US Citizens are the Federal Governments definitions of "national emergency", "healthcare crisis" and "public health emergency". This legislation allows the President to define these, as well as deploy armed forces, seperate from controls and jurisdictions of our current military branches, to do his bidding.
 
I was thinking of posting this last one over here, but you beat me to it... :paperwork

Funding + Right Event = Martial Law/Suspension of the Constitution/Civil War?
 
Happy New Year folks!

2011 is welcomed in with the Marxist strategy of overthrowing the government, using the Cloward and Piven plan from the 60's.......

Frances Piven is still at it.....stirring up the people with a sense of entitlement, jump on the Welfare train and revolt with violence. For those of you who missed the 60's, Piven is calling for a sequel.

So where are the angry crowds, the demonstrations, sit-ins and unruly mobs? After all, the injustice is apparent. Working people are losing their homes and their pensions while robber-baron CEOs report renewed profits and windfall bonuses. Shouldn't the unemployed be on the march? Why aren't they demanding enhanced safety net protections and big initiatives to generate jobs?

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=43271
 
Last edited:
It looks like the new targets are the pension plans of those fortunate to still have them. Not a day goes by when I don't hear from some disembosied voice on the radio of how I don't pay into a plan, have a cushy plan etc. The protests have started Jeff, it is just in words and inuendo.

Happy and Prosperous New Year to all NAXJA.
Tom
 
Tom,
As a point of clarification, the text in red is from Piven's linked article. She is calling for the same violent uprising that we are seeing in Europe, here in the US.
 
ahhh. I was reading it as a rhetorical question, lamenting that protests haven't started and not a call to action.

BTW: I pay $279 every other week into my Government pension.
 
ahhh. I was reading it as a rhetorical question, lamenting that protests haven't started and not a call to action.

BTW: I pay $279 every other week into my Government pension.

I thought you were already a grey card holder ?
 
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies.

Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally.

Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here'. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren.

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."

Senator Barack Obama -2006

image7209876.jpg



I don’t see why anybody’s playing chicken with the debt ceiling. If we get to the point where we damage the full faith and credit of the United States, that would be the first default in history caused purely by insanity.

-Austan Goolsbee, White House Council of Economic Advisers 2011

http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/national-debt-skyrocket

I couldn't agree more with Senator Obama's statement from 2006. It is 100% on the mark.
 
I thought you were already a grey card holder ?


Not yet...combined pension 6yr AD + 21yr SELRES + 8yr AD so it is a reserve pension collectible at age 58. I am now working for The County of San Francisco as the Chief Mechanical Officer for the transit system.
 
Union Boss Trumka Admits Main Goal is Using Unions To Fundamentally Change America into His Progressive Vision not Negotiate Members Salaries

http://www.blip.tv/file/4520201?fil...geUnionBossTrumkaDoesntCareAboutNegoti875.m4v#

A little history on Richard Trumka and Communist/Union connections.....

Trumka and his fellow AFL-CIO bosses see free market capitalism not as essential to worker prosperity but as something to be despised and destroyed. "Union Summer" seeks to spread ideological hatred of capitalism, as well as love for "progressive" government, throughout the union movement. The ultimate aim is not to boost members' wages, but to radically transform society.

Shortly after coming to power, Trumka, Sweeney and Chavez-Thompson rescinded a founding AFL-CIO rule that banned Communist Party members and loyalists from leadership positions within the Federation and its unions. The "New Voice" triumvirate welcomed Communist Party delegates to positions of power in the Federation. And the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) declared itself "in complete accord" with the troika's new AFL-CIO program. "The radical shift in both leadership and policy is a very positive, even historic change," wrote CPUSA National Chairman Gus Hall in 1996 about the Trumka/Sweeney/Chavez-Thompson takeover.

One condition of the AFL-CIO merger of 1955 was that outright Communists be purged from CIO unions. The AFL-CIO in 1957 instituted a rule that required any union official invoking his Fifth Amendment right (to avoid incriminating himself before a congressional committee) to be removed from his position. But when Richard Trumka twice invoked his Fifth Amendment right in a case involving a corruption and money-laundering scandal during the late 1990s, the response by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney was to purge the rule instead of the rule-breaker Trumka.

This case involved the Teamsters Union, whose President Ron Carey faced likely defeat in his 1996 run for re-election. According to congressional testimony, Carey agreed to raise $1 million for the Democratic National Committee if $100,000 could be provided to him immediately to finance his re-election campaign. In this shell game, as witnesses explained it, the Teamsters Union paid $150,000 to the AFL-CIO, the same amount which its Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka immediately thereafter gave from AFL-CIO accounts to the leftwing political group Citizen Action, which within days provided $100,000 to the Carey campaign.

Among those named by witnesses and investigators as involved in this scheme to illegally fund and influence a union election were Richard Trumka, Ron Carey, Andrew Stern, AFSCME President Gerald McEntee, Bill Clinton's Deputy Chief of Staff Harold Ickes, and Clinton-Gorefundraiser Terry McAuliffe.

When the Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Peter Hoekstra started looking into this Teamsters Union scandal, he was asked by the Clinton-appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Mary Jo White, not to subpoena McAuliffe, Ickes, Trumka and certain others on grounds that their testimony might interfere with a criminal investigation that she and the Clinton Justice Department were already pursuing. But after Hoekstra agreed to White’s request, as he described it, "the entire Teamsters investigation [by White and the Clinton Justice Department] has fallen into a black hole."


  • In February 2009, President Barack Obama named Trumka to his Economic Recovery Advisory Board.
  • On Nov 3, 2010-- the day after mid-term elections in which Democrats lost 6 Senate seats, more than 60 House seats, and 7 governorships -- Communist Party USA Labor Commission chairman Scott Marshall emphasized that his organization had worked collaboratively on political campaigns with Trumka. Said Marshall:
"The continuing independence of the labor movement was heightened tremendously by the election, and in very specific ways, not just in general. Not only did the campaigning take place from union hall,... but this time, as Trumka told us when he was in Chicago, they began the nuts and bolts [of] building independent labor campaign organizations in five key cities around the country."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pejpgVJJbgo&feature=player_embedded#!

As Union membership shrinks, Trumka earns more

Richard Trumka increased his yearly salary by nearly $74,000—from $165,000.00 to $238,975.00 — in the last four years.(as of 2009) That amounts to a 44 percent salary increase. In addition, Trumka will also get an AFL-CIO pension equal to 60 percent of his top pay.
 
Not yet...combined pension 6yr AD + 21yr SELRES + 8yr AD so it is a reserve pension collectible at age 58. I am now working for The County of San Francisco as the Chief Mechanical Officer for the transit system.
Mine goes in Oct...finally... as well as tricare.
 
Speaking of retirement benefits......Sen Reid is talking out his backside once again, this time on how strong our Social Security program is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrR6AZXiVtI&feature=player_embedded#

Now for some facts:

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Social Security will post a $45 billion shortfall in fiscal 2011 and will pay out more in benefits than it accepts in payroll taxes through at least 2021 without legislative changes, the Congressional Budget office said on Wednesday.

The CBO made the forecast in its twice-annual assessment of the U.S. budget. The non-partisan office, which provides budget and economic analysis to the U.S. Congress, said that deficits would total $547 billion over the period from 2012 to 2021.

The forecasts exclude transfers into the program from interest and other payments. The weakest part of the Social Security program is the portion that provides disability payments; that fund will be drained in 2017, the CBO projected.
-By Siobhan Hughes, Dow Jones Newswires

http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=11943

Seems to fit this description: Ponzi scheme


Let's look at the Securities and Exchange Commission's perspective:

Why do Ponzi schemes collapse?

With little or no legitimate earnings, the schemes require a consistent flow of money from new investors to continue. Ponzi schemes tend to collapse when it becomes difficult to recruit new investors or when a large number of investors ask to cash out.

http://www.sec.gov/answers/ponzi.htm
 
Last edited:
AFL-CIO Union President Richard Trumka, who received awards in December 2010 from the Communist Party USA, openly admits that he meets weekly with Obama and members of his Administration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4NrT2oTQqE&feature=player_embedded

Community Organizing was the highlight of Obama’s resume. Karl Marx knew all about this. Community organization is the core of Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA movement. Both are Obama supporters and pawns, just as they are for and with Richard Trumka. Community organizing is what got Obama elected, combines communities of Union members, special interest groups, Green worshipers, etc for a common goal.

The Change in Obama's agenda is Fabain Socialism.

"..., advocates of social reconstruction have learned the lesson of Democracy, and know that it is through the slow and gradual turning of the popular mind to new principles that social reorganization bit by bit comes."


“ You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won’t have to fight you. We’ll so weaken your economy until you’ll fall like overripe fruit into our hands."
Communist Soviet leader-Nikita Khrushchev
 
International Socialist Organization secured the permit for the "Rally to save the American Dream", promoted by Communist Van Jones.

Supporting organizations include:
MoveOn.org
ColorofChange.org
SEIU
AFL-CIO
AFSCME
George Soros’ Media Matters
Apollo Alliance
Sierra Club
Planned Parenthood

The ISO stands in the tradition of revolutionary socialists Karl Marx, V.I. Lenin and Leon Trotsky in the belief that workers themselves–the vast majority of the population–are the only force that can lead the fight to win a socialist society."

"Socialism can’t be brought about from above, but has to be won by workers themselves."
"We see our task as building an independent socialist organization with members organizing in our workplaces, our schools and our neighborhoods to bring socialist ideas to the struggles we are involved in today, and the vision of a socialist world in the future."


This rally is a text-book example of Community Organizing. President Obama was elected by the organized communities of Socialist-led Unions.


Vice President Joe Biden recognized the union activists for being a driving force behind his own political career. “I’ve got to state the obvious,” he said. “There’s an old expression: ‘You go home with them that brung you to the dance.’ You guys all brought me to the dance 36 years ago in Delaware as a United States senator. You’ve been with me, and I’ve stayed with you.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/17/biden-union-barbarians-labor_n_837346.html

Biden admits that unions put him in power and have kept him in power, Obama has done the same. Unions are run by Socialists with a clearly stated Marxist agenda.

  • Union members.....ask yourselves, are you a Marxist too?
Keep your eyes open and remain vigilant, recognize the evil cancer of Socialism and its threat to our God-given Rights and Freedoms.
 
Communist Party USA national Secretary, Sam Webb, highlights why the CPUSA will support Obama in 2012.

But the main question from a strategic point of view is this: Does it make any difference, from the standpoint of the class and democratic struggles, which party gains political ascendency?

Some – though not the labor movement nor other mass organizations of the American people – say no, it doesn’t.
Some even go a step further and say a Democratic victory creates popular illusions, which in turn weaken the people’s struggles. And the only way out of this vise is to form a third party now.

Communists don’t agree with either one of these views. In our view, the differences between the two parties of capitalism are of consequence to class and democratic struggles.

Neither party is anti-capitalist, but they aren’t identical either. Differences exist at the levels of policy and social composition. And despite the many frustrations of the past two years, the election of Barack Obama was historic and gave space to struggle for a people’s agenda.

If, on the other hand, the Republicans had been victorious in 2008 the character of class and democratic struggles would have unfolded very differently. Our movement would have been on the defensive from Day One, the Democrats would be running for cover, and the Republicans would have an unfettered hand in their efforts to liquidate the welfare state, roll back the rights revolution of the 1930s and 1960s, and crush the people’s movement – labor in the first place.
As for the wisdom of a third party, we have always advocated the formation of an independent people’s party at the core of which are the working class and labor, racially and nationally oppressed people, women, youth, immigrants, seniors, gay and straight, etc. It is essential for any deep-going social change. But its realization depends on more than our desire, more than our political-ideological attitude.

Millions who have to be at the core of this party still operate under the umbrella of the Democratic Party, albeit increasingly in an independent fashion.
Moreover, to separate ourselves at this moment from these forces would be contrary to our strategic policy of building maximum unity against right-wing extremism now and in next year’s elections.

Now that doesn’t mean that we give up our advocacy of an independent people’s party, but we also understand that its formation is dictated by concrete political realities and strategic necessities. Nor does it mean that we hit the mute button when the Obama administration takes positions that we don’t agree with. Just as we show no hesitation in supporting, and fighting for, the administration’s progressive initiatives, we should have no compunction about taking issue with the administration when it takes positions that we don’t agree on.
Which is what we have done.

When someone says we are not critical of the administration what they usually mean is that our criticism isn’t as sweeping and categorical as they would like.
We make criticisms, but we do it in a certain context and with a certain strategic objective in mind. We are keenly aware of the fact that the agenda of the far right is to bring this administration and country to its knees, with a heavy dose of racism, lies and economic sabotage, setting the stage for a full blown return to power of the most reactionary, racist, anti-labor, anti-women, homophobic and militarist grouping in U.S. politics.

We want no part of that. We don’t have any illusions about the Democratic Party, but we don’t have any illusions about the Republican Party either.

Furthermore, we are also aware of the undeniable fact that no other party besides the Democratic Party stands a chance of beating the GOP next year.


http://peoplesworld.org/does-it-matter-which-party-wins/

 
Interest collaboration of propaganda:

We are keenly aware of the fact that the agenda of the far right is to bring this administration and country to its knees, with a heavy dose of racism, lies and economic sabotage, setting the stage for a full blown return to power of the most reactionary, racist, anti-labor, anti-women, homophobic and militarist grouping in U.S. politics.
 
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka and Communist Party USA supporter:

"These events signal a new and dangerous phase of a concerted effort to change the very nature of America - to turn this into an 'I've got mine' nation and replace the land of liberty and justice for all with the land of the rich, by the rich and for the rich," Trumka declared.


http://peoplesworld.org/afl-cio-head-if-you-re-not-supporting-us-we-won-t-support-you/

This is a perfect example of how the union structure works, and the lies and hypocracy within........


  • Chief executive officers at 299 U.S. companies had combined compensation of $3.4 billion in 2010, enough to pay more than 102,000 workers, the AFL-CIO labor federation reported in a study.
  • CEOs averaged $11.4 million in total compensation in 2010, according to the report, which used data from website salary.com. Viacom’s CEO Philippe P. Dauman earned $84.5 million last year, the highest among the executives, according to the report.
  • “The disparity between CEO and workers’ pay has continued to grow to levels that are completely stunning,” union President Richard Trumka said today at a Washington news conference. He said the U.S. is facing “runaway CEO pay.”
Trumka, 61, had total compensation of $283,340, including $246,827 in salary, according to a 2010 union filing with the Labor Department. Service Employees International Union President Mary Kay Henry had compensation of $253,660, including $213,801 in salary, according to a separate filing.


Supporting statistics from the AFL-CIO website
http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/index.cfm




Now let's take Dick's math and apply it, using the union money:

  • $3,400,000.00 ($3.4M) in non-Union CEO salaries, divided by 102,325 workers = $33,227 per year (about $16 per hour)
  • Using a conservative figure of $50 per month for union dues, in 2010, unions collected $735,000,000 per month in union dues from America’s unionized workers.

  • $735,000,000 X 12 months = $8,820,000,000 ($8.82B) that was collected in union dues in 2010.
  • Divide $8,820,000,000 X $33,227 = 265,447 workers’ jobs
Rather than creating or saving jobs, given that unions do not produce a product and can actually be attributed with being masters of manipulation, buying politicians, killing companies, pushing policies that stiffle growth, as well as creating huge pension and health care deficits, perhaps it’s really time to rein in union dues.

 
Back
Top