5-90
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Hammerspace
I've spent the last half-hour on the phone with them (ten minutes of that was spent wading through IVR...) and got more answers that I didn't like.
Apparently, the Feds are also involved - extorting California (who does enough extortion on their own, thank you very much...) by threatening to withhold their "matched tax dollars" or whatever - which is, oddly enough, our money in the first place. WTF?)
Why did I call? I'm being sent - for the THIRD time in a row - to a "Test Only" station. Why for? I'm still not sure - the guy I was talking to (Marvin - actually quite helpful) was able to look up my numbers on his terminal
My last failure was in 1999 (I don't recall why,) and I've consistently shown good numbers since. Hell, he said I show better numbers than vehicles ten years newer!
So, why for am I going to "Test Only" stations, and paying $90 for a smog test on a $55 renewal? Because, despite my numbers, I'm still lumped into a "gross emitter" category because my vehicle is 20 years old (Hm - how long is that "rolling exemption?" 25 years, or 30?) and, apparently, this class of vehicle "commonly fails test." Bugger.
1) I plan to write my state reps - I'm getting tired of this.
2) If you own an XJ in CA, please PLEASE please maintain it well and lower your emissions numbers. For all of our sakes - I can't be the only one getting hot under the collar about this! It's bad enough our renewals are going up on their own ($55 this year, $46 last year. WTF?) Hell, if you own an XJ and are under the thumb of the Air Police anywhere in the country, let's work on this. It's possible to have nearly zero emissions with these things. If I can do it on RENIX, you can do it with HO easily enough (if they'd let me work a few things out, I could put my emissions even lower...)
3) Perhaps more of us should take Item #1 to task, and get these people snowed under with paper. They don't seem to be thinking...
[/RANT]
Note that, for the record, I have nothing against "trying to improve air quality" or whatever they're calling it this week - I just get tired of the way they're trying to do it. Apply some thinking to the problem. If you're going to make a decision on a technical issue, learn something about the technology and how it works - first. Don't rely on advisors, either...
Apparently, the Feds are also involved - extorting California (who does enough extortion on their own, thank you very much...) by threatening to withhold their "matched tax dollars" or whatever - which is, oddly enough, our money in the first place. WTF?)
Why did I call? I'm being sent - for the THIRD time in a row - to a "Test Only" station. Why for? I'm still not sure - the guy I was talking to (Marvin - actually quite helpful) was able to look up my numbers on his terminal
My last failure was in 1999 (I don't recall why,) and I've consistently shown good numbers since. Hell, he said I show better numbers than vehicles ten years newer!
So, why for am I going to "Test Only" stations, and paying $90 for a smog test on a $55 renewal? Because, despite my numbers, I'm still lumped into a "gross emitter" category because my vehicle is 20 years old (Hm - how long is that "rolling exemption?" 25 years, or 30?) and, apparently, this class of vehicle "commonly fails test." Bugger.
1) I plan to write my state reps - I'm getting tired of this.
2) If you own an XJ in CA, please PLEASE please maintain it well and lower your emissions numbers. For all of our sakes - I can't be the only one getting hot under the collar about this! It's bad enough our renewals are going up on their own ($55 this year, $46 last year. WTF?) Hell, if you own an XJ and are under the thumb of the Air Police anywhere in the country, let's work on this. It's possible to have nearly zero emissions with these things. If I can do it on RENIX, you can do it with HO easily enough (if they'd let me work a few things out, I could put my emissions even lower...)
3) Perhaps more of us should take Item #1 to task, and get these people snowed under with paper. They don't seem to be thinking...
[/RANT]
Note that, for the record, I have nothing against "trying to improve air quality" or whatever they're calling it this week - I just get tired of the way they're trying to do it. Apply some thinking to the problem. If you're going to make a decision on a technical issue, learn something about the technology and how it works - first. Don't rely on advisors, either...