moneypitxj
NAXJA Member #565
- Location
- york, pa
when can we see prices for the paragon trip in june? is one day going to be paragon and another rausch? just feeling inquisitive
PeterBuilt said:Hey Eagle i dont know about everyone else but having two parks would make Nac fest not that enjoyable. Yes two parks will let you see more trails and stuff like that but it would take allot of organization to make it work. Hell its hard enough to set a date for nac fest. If people would like to go to paragon and rausch creek then make two nac runs. Or a non official trailride the same time as the tellico trip to give people an option. There is no such thing as too many planed wheeling trips. Shoot out some dates early to give people the heads up so that they can plan things. Like nac fest working around tellico's dates, if we had planed nac fest earlier then we could have let tellico be planed around us! Why not plan next year with like 3 or 4 nac events, now?
Anyone else agree??
Pete
woody said:Well, Tellico is a National event (it was the XJ Fest for 2 yrs before we returned that back into a 'roving' summer event) that has been held every year on the the weekend after July 4th for four years now... don't expect that changed to suit a few 'maybe attenders'![]()
SE Chapter usually does a spring run there as well as one Haloween weekend...not really 'formal' events, just friends showing up to wheel Tellico & socialize in a low-key semi-organized way, in a place that's glad to see us come visit.
As far as picking dates, seems to me if y'all could just set a date, or dates and stick with it... it'll be easier on folks who might want to attend, and become easier for the places you go to schedule you in... Switching dates all over the calendar and waiting for the last minute to solidify isn't productive IMHO.
If y'all schedule a Chapter event on a date that coincides with another event (or otherwise) it only offers folks more choices of things to do...which isn't a bad thing IMHO.
Mike in NJ said:As for the Paragon - Rausch Creek dilemma. I think I have to comment a bit on Eagle's remarks - he leaves you with the impression that Paragon is not suitable for stock vehicles and Rausch is a stock park. PAP has plenty of stock trails in it's upper level. It's true that one of the main "stock" level entrance trails to get to mid park attractions has eroded a bit, but we expect that Paragon management will be looking into that. And as for Rausch - there are sections of that park (like Rock Creek) that Paragon would die for - RC can (as Paragon) be as hard, or as easy, as you want it to be.
woody said:All I'll say again is pick a date and hold it year after year. Help your facility accomodate you. If y'all waver, the For Profit places will book ya out. If they waver, tell them y'all schedule elsewhere. We're big enough to book a year ahead of time, so don't miss opportunities!
Really? I was just at Paragon back in September with Stroker, Skorpyo, and a few others, and I got around just fine with my stocker. Unfortunately, I can't remember what trails we went on (I think we did Cherokee Ridge, but that's the only name that I can think of) but the guys were great about finding stuff I could get through (admittedly, I did take a bypass or two), even though I was the only stocker that day. Maybe they did fix things up since you last were there.Eagle said:I'm sure we will have other events at Rausch Creek during the year also. One of the reasons to consider splitting NACFest is that Paragon has gotten so overused that trails I used to be able to run in a stock XJ are now barely passable in the MJ with 4" of lift. Although I haven't managed to see Rausch Creek "up close and personal" yet, my spies tell me there are more true stock-level trails there.
Yes, I know Paragon still shows stock level trails on their maps, but the maps haven't been updated and the trail ratings are not realistic. Unless they have done a lot of trail repair and regrading since a year ago, there's not much at Paragon that a stock XJ can negotiate without severe risk of body and/or running gear damage.
Eagle said:That's the point, Rob. My stocker doesn't have skid plates (working on that), and body damage is not acceptable. I may be in a minority, but IMHO when you rate a trail "Stock" it should be passable by a STOCK (no armor) vehicle without damage.
John B said:"without damage"...or without the possibility of damage?
There's too many variables in traveling down a trail that'll determine whether or not a driver will negotiate said trail without incurring damage. Be it driver error,condition of trail/obstacle,weather,experience of spotter etc.
Is there a specific trail at PAP your refering to? Valley?,.. perhaps at the hill below Cherokee ridge?
rockreadyxj said:Eagle whats with worry about body damage you have your own personal Junk Yard.
You gotta run what brung!!!!!
Hammer down!!