- Location
- NJ, U.S.A.
Forgive me, needed to vent a little:
Just had the brakes worked on on my '92 at my usual dealer (I know, I know), due to parking brake problems. It wouldn't hold, and on the rare occasions, it did, it wouldn't let go willingly - had to drive it to get it free
Took it to the dealer (who has had the vehicle before, and has done good work), who told me that the rear shoes were falling apart, the front pads were brittle, there was a frozen wheel cylinder in back, and that all the rotors and drums were worn to the point that there was nothing left to turn/cut.
So, new rotors, drums, pads, shoes, wheel cylinders. Parking brake cables were replaced 18 months ago and were deemed ok.
Got it back, and the parking brake is now only holding correctly (based on sitting in my driveway) at 13 clicks of the handle, and the thing only goes one more, to 14. My driveway's not flat, but neither is it vertical. In the past, I've never had to go more than 7 clicks to get good hold on any slope.
The dealer is telling me the following:
1. The cup holder (over-the-brake-handle style) is interfering with the parking brake.
2. The rear brakes cannot be adjusted any further or "they start to drag"
3. They seem to doubt that the cup holder is a factory part. The manual describes the other style (to the side of the tranny shifter), but I've never had that style - when I bought it at another dealer back in 12/97, it had this thing, and I assumed it to be OEM, possibly a running change. They have one of the parts guys researching it right now, and when he calls me later this morning, I intend to ask if he checked everything from 1984-1996, not just 1992.
UPDATE: Just got a call from the parts guy while typing this, and he's telling me that my cup holder is aftermarket. According to him, the only one Chrysler ever offered was the one that goes on the side of the center console.
I am currently facing having to remove my cup holder in order to use my parking brake now. I've owned this thing since 12/97, logged the last ~130,000 of its 202,400 miles, and have had the parking brake adjusted several times over that period at three different dealers, including this one, which has done it at least 3 times. They've never said anything about the cup holder before, and the brake has always been adjusted so that it would hold properly at 6-7 clicks (usually 7, which is when the handle hits the cup holder).
Needless to say, I am not happy with the way the parking brake is performing, and I have said as much to the service writer on two occasions (one of which was 15 minutes ago). He doesn't seem to understand why I'm not satisfied - he keeps saying that the thing is "adjusted to factory spec, any more and the rear brakes will start to drag". I'm getting aggravated - I want my brake to work right. I mean, after all, if they adjusted it 2-3 times to work with the cup holder before, what's the damn problem now? With new, presumably thicker drums and shoes, I would have expected to need less travel for the same engagement on the parking brake, not nearly double.
This has been an unscheduled rant. We now return you to your regularly scheduled forum, already in progress.
Rob
P.S. BTW, where the hell does Chrysler get off charging $108 for a balsted disc rotor anyway!? And $158/ea. for the drums!?
Just had the brakes worked on on my '92 at my usual dealer (I know, I know), due to parking brake problems. It wouldn't hold, and on the rare occasions, it did, it wouldn't let go willingly - had to drive it to get it free
Took it to the dealer (who has had the vehicle before, and has done good work), who told me that the rear shoes were falling apart, the front pads were brittle, there was a frozen wheel cylinder in back, and that all the rotors and drums were worn to the point that there was nothing left to turn/cut.
So, new rotors, drums, pads, shoes, wheel cylinders. Parking brake cables were replaced 18 months ago and were deemed ok.
Got it back, and the parking brake is now only holding correctly (based on sitting in my driveway) at 13 clicks of the handle, and the thing only goes one more, to 14. My driveway's not flat, but neither is it vertical. In the past, I've never had to go more than 7 clicks to get good hold on any slope.
The dealer is telling me the following:
1. The cup holder (over-the-brake-handle style) is interfering with the parking brake.
2. The rear brakes cannot be adjusted any further or "they start to drag"
3. They seem to doubt that the cup holder is a factory part. The manual describes the other style (to the side of the tranny shifter), but I've never had that style - when I bought it at another dealer back in 12/97, it had this thing, and I assumed it to be OEM, possibly a running change. They have one of the parts guys researching it right now, and when he calls me later this morning, I intend to ask if he checked everything from 1984-1996, not just 1992.
UPDATE: Just got a call from the parts guy while typing this, and he's telling me that my cup holder is aftermarket. According to him, the only one Chrysler ever offered was the one that goes on the side of the center console.
I am currently facing having to remove my cup holder in order to use my parking brake now. I've owned this thing since 12/97, logged the last ~130,000 of its 202,400 miles, and have had the parking brake adjusted several times over that period at three different dealers, including this one, which has done it at least 3 times. They've never said anything about the cup holder before, and the brake has always been adjusted so that it would hold properly at 6-7 clicks (usually 7, which is when the handle hits the cup holder).
Needless to say, I am not happy with the way the parking brake is performing, and I have said as much to the service writer on two occasions (one of which was 15 minutes ago). He doesn't seem to understand why I'm not satisfied - he keeps saying that the thing is "adjusted to factory spec, any more and the rear brakes will start to drag". I'm getting aggravated - I want my brake to work right. I mean, after all, if they adjusted it 2-3 times to work with the cup holder before, what's the damn problem now? With new, presumably thicker drums and shoes, I would have expected to need less travel for the same engagement on the parking brake, not nearly double.
This has been an unscheduled rant. We now return you to your regularly scheduled forum, already in progress.
Rob
P.S. BTW, where the hell does Chrysler get off charging $108 for a balsted disc rotor anyway!? And $158/ea. for the drums!?