NO aftermarket Jeep 4.0 intakes???

[Mike1331]

thats a fairly cheap intial cost for 40-60 horses, sign me up.

 

[gradon]

ITBs made 80-90% of the difference between the Euro e36 M3 3.2l getting 321HP and the non-ITB US e36 M3 3.2l only getting 240HP. I like Clifford products and will try to use one of their headers in the future.

 

[Boostwerks.com]

ITBs made 80-90% of the difference between the Euro e36 M3 3.2l getting 321HP and the non-ITB US e36 M3 3.2l only getting 240HP. I like Clifford products and will try to use one of their headers in the future.

Talk about apples to oranges.

ITB's are great for motors that have high RPM intake velocities, and valve overlap due to lumpy cams such as the honda B18C5 or the Ferrari V12.

If your looking for a low/mid range torque output ITB's don't make any sense. Combine that with the fact that the 4.0 head flows like crap and it just doesn't make sense. Hence: ITB's on a 4.0 = :nono:

I'd like to see a dyno of a 4.0 with the ITB's. I'd be willing to bet it ends up loosing area under the curve.

 

[KJurasek]

The "head" question is a good one. How come Hesco is the only one that makes a "performer" head? Alabama Cylinder Head makes a head, not a performer, more like stock but beefer.

Edelbrock heads??

Hmm....

 

[KJurasek]

As for the ITB question, Clifford does have some hot cams to go with those ITB's. Way more than a stock ECU can handle, so you would have to run a programmable "piggy back" computer or one from someone like Hesco.

 

[BenDiesel]

mega squirt sequential with cpp thats what i plan on running

 

[wolfpackjeeper]

I have been planning on running that for about 3 years now, somehow shit keeps coming up and I never do it