ECKSJAY said:
Results were back today.
Anyone else notice that something like this happens (guy goes apeshit and ingests cocaine and alcohol, then shoots at his kid/neighbors, threatens to kill his wife, shoots and injures police officers, holds his baby daughter hostage) the family members and neighbors say, 'Oh he was such a sweet and loving person...a good father. THe police murdered him!'
What a crock of shit. I went through this when my cousin died in a stolen Cadillac while running from the police. 'The police shouldn't have chased him!' WTF? Is that what the pushbars are for on the front of the cars? Nudging them along if they don't run? Whatever... Glad my family finally 'came to' and realized that he made poor decisions that cost him his life and the life of his best friend.
Oh yeah, the link...
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-071305toddler_lat,0,2261555.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Well they lost the Cadillac and your cousin, it was justified because he made a bad decission. If they (the people who get paid to make those policies and decissions) would have made another decission, there was a chance him and the Cadillac might have survived. Obvious, your cousins judgement was flawed.
If somebody runs and somebody chases him, chances are he is gonna keep right on running. If nobody is chasing him, chances are he isn´t gonna run much farther. It´s not rocket science.
When I do a pursuit, it´s just to get close enough to use my binoculars. Then I use my radio, then I get in front of him, not behind him. The guys on the other end of the radio, are positioning themselves to observe from the front. If he gets away, better luck next time.
I think my policy, may in many instances, be more survivable than, the one used on your cousin.
Like I said at the beginning, same old stuff in the same old way. Flawed policy and probably a bad institutional mind set by the LAPD. In this instance, it may be justified, but it sure has the same aroma, as it did thirty years ago.
Contain and control, just might work out better than confrontation. Of course like you mentioned, all the facts aren´t in yet, the presses facts, the Polices facts or the actual facts.
Sometimes you gotta do what you got to do, sometimes another methode just might work out better.
I remember my last serious confrontation with LA Sheriffs department, they said I attacked five of them, striking them repeatedly around the hands and fists, with my face. The newspapers said, It was because I was protesting, two womens right to sun bath topless on a private beach. Vaugely remember the topless sunbathers, barley noticed, wasn´t impressed. Another few minutes , me and my dog would have been long gone. I was just passing through.
Is it possible, that often, it´s just all so unnecessary.