I smell fish.....

If you think there's such a person in the as yet current pool, I have a nice bridge I've been saving up to sell you ...

And as far as a term that was "pc" in 61, i wouldn't know as I wasn't born yet, but I'm thinking that if his dad had been from mexico it would have said "mexican" instead of hispanic or whatever the term was then; had he been from jamaica, "jamaican" instead of ... negro. That's the direction I'm going. Of course, I'm speculating since I can only guess at what flavor was being used in this country at the time. But it makes sense to me ...

Anyway, the real issue in my book right now is what is taking so long for someone to blame Obama for the Japanese disaster. You guys are slacking ... Or maybe I missed that thread.
 
If you think there's such a person in the as yet current pool, I have a nice bridge I've been saving up to sell you ...

And as far as a term that was "pc" in 61, i wouldn't know as I wasn't born yet, but I'm thinking that if his dad had been from mexico it would have said "mexican" instead of hispanic or whatever the term was then; had he been from jamaica, "jamaican" instead of ... negro. That's the direction I'm going. Of course, I'm speculating since I can only guess at what flavor was being used in this country at the time. But it makes sense to me ...

Anyway, the real issue in my book right now is what is taking so long for someone to blame Obama for the Japanese disaster. You guys are slacking ... Or maybe I missed that thread.

I only blame Obama and the elected clowns in DC for writing laws and making trade agreements that shafted the US in the long term. I blame that peckerhead for not doing any thing about it now other than paying lip service to the problem. These idiots in DC still have not closed the dam barn doors.
 
If you think there's such a person in the as yet current pool, I have a nice bridge I've been saving up to sell you ...

And as far as a term that was "pc" in 61, i wouldn't know as I wasn't born yet, but I'm thinking that if his dad had been from mexico it would have said "mexican" instead of hispanic or whatever the term was then; had he been from jamaica, "jamaican" instead of ... negro. That's the direction I'm going. Of course, I'm speculating since I can only guess at what flavor was being used in this country at the time. But it makes sense to me ...

Anyway, the real issue in my book right now is what is taking so long for someone to blame Obama for the Japanese disaster. You guys are slacking ... Or maybe I missed that thread.

Only an Obama worshipper would credit him with the ability to control the elements.......you could learn a lot here if you could see around that chip on your shoulder.
 
If you think there's such a person in the as yet current pool, I have a nice bridge I've been saving up to sell you ...
All politicians are scum, its just deciding how dirty you want to get


Anyway, the real issue in my book right now is what is taking so long for someone to blame Obama for the Japanese disaster. You guys are slacking ... Or maybe I missed that thread.
Your confusing us with the hope and change crowd that blamed bush for everything.
Of course you know that obama is going to claim he created jobs if any factories in japan that cant be rebuilt in the hot zone come to the US, thats the way it works. Blame others for anything bad, and claim good things you had nothing to do with for yourself.
 
Didnt everyone running have to prove their citizenship? It woulda made sense if he just did it during the political race & had it out of the way. I'd say it woulda made sense simply because the middle eastern concern - 9/11... silly as it may sound... Obama comes off sounding a bit like Osama. Would have eased some of the worried folk... maybe.
 
If you think there's such a person in the as yet current pool, I have a nice bridge I've been saving up to sell you ...

And as far as a term that was "pc" in 61, i wouldn't know as I wasn't born yet, but I'm thinking that if his dad had been from mexico it would have said "mexican" instead of hispanic or whatever the term was then; had he been from jamaica, "jamaican" instead of ... negro. That's the direction I'm going. Of course, I'm speculating since I can only guess at what flavor was being used in this country at the time. But it makes sense to me ...

Anyway, the real issue in my book right now is what is taking so long for someone to blame Obama for the Japanese disaster. You guys are slacking ... Or maybe I missed that thread.
The field is for ethnicity or race, not nationality. A Jamaican and an Ethiopian are both black/negro. If they wanted nationality (Jamaican or Mexican) then my kids' birth certificates would say mother and father are both American, not caucasian and african or black, whatever they're using for us darkies today.
 
Back on topic...

tooksolong.jpg
 
Anybody here ever get a full TS BI done by the govt ? I have, that you could get by not being born here is about 99% impossible. They came up with stuff I forgot.
 
If you think there's such a person in the as yet current pool, I have a nice bridge I've been saving up to sell you ...

And as far as a term that was "pc" in 61, i wouldn't know as I wasn't born yet, but I'm thinking that if his dad had been from mexico it would have said "mexican" instead of hispanic or whatever the term was then; had he been from jamaica, "jamaican" instead of ... negro. That's the direction I'm going. Of course, I'm speculating since I can only guess at what flavor was being used in this country at the time. But it makes sense to me ...

One huge problem in your logic....you seemed to have confused race with nationality.

Regardless of one's place of origin, race is divided into federal and state brackets. Early 60's the brackets were very broad, i.e., white, black, hispanic, other. It's only been in recent decades that they were broadened to include things like Asian, Native American, Middle Eastern, etc.

EDIT: Guess I should read all the posts, apparently Darky beat me to the response. =)

And perhaps I should clarify, I'm not siding in on either side of the debate. If you want to be a conspiracy theorist, it's not difficult to postulate that the White House simply pressured the hospital to produce "necessary" documents. However, even fake documents would not have taken this long to produce. My problem with the whole thing is that for a president who campaigned on transparency, he sure seems to hide a lot, i.e., his birth certificate, the health care debates/discussions, and now, Osama bin Laden's body. Even a retarded 3rd grader knew the world, not just American citizens, were going to question the validity of this statement without some kind of evidence.
 
Last edited:
Anybody here ever get a full TS BI done by the govt ? I have, that you could get by not being born here is about 99% impossible. They came up with stuff I forgot.


I'm all for making it a requirement that to be appointed or elected to a national position (senate, house, pres, SC, Sec State, etc) that you have to be able to get and keep a TS clearance. That would eliminate a lot of deadwood. That and actually pay your taxes and if you call for higher taxes that you stop taking itemized deductions. Live what you preach if your going to be a public servant.
 
Anybody here ever get a full TS BI done by the govt ? I have, that you could get by not being born here is about 99% impossible. They came up with stuff I forgot.

Yeah I had totally forgotten about that time on the farm...

What is truly amazing about this Osama Mission it sounds like some congressionals were briefed awhile ago and it didn't leak out.
 
Only an Obama worshipper would credit him with the ability to control the elements.......you could learn a lot here if you could see around that chip on your shoulder.
I'm hardly an Obama worshipper. Yes, I consider myself a Democrat, but I didn't even acknowledge the guy until Hillary was no longer there to vote for. No chip on my shoulder either. It's just annoying that every tiny move the guy makes comes under intense scrutiny and frankly this is clearly a damned-if-you-do ... etc. presidency. Even now with the BC released to shut you all up you're not satisfied because now there's something "wrong" with it. Never before have I seen the vultures swarm over a President like they have been doing with this one. He can do absolutely nothing right. And why is this so? My sense of fair play is acutely offended - and that is why entered this thread. Read what you all want into it. But there are more important things going on to constantly bitch about than to see whether Obama wipes with his right or his left hand.
 
It's just annoying that every tiny move the guy makes comes under intense scrutiny and frankly this is clearly a damned-if-you-do ... etc. presidency.
Its not only obama, every president goes under the same scrutiny. The same people who cry foul when we question obama were the ones questioning everything Bush did.
 
Lets hear it for the whining Libtards. Its fair for you to do everything in your power to find anything to criticize Bush or even Palin, but heaven help it if it happens to your guy. All of the sudden the rules chang? You made your bed, so now you can lay in it.
 
I'm hardly an Obama worshipper. Yes, I consider myself a Democrat, but I didn't even acknowledge the guy until Hillary was no longer there to vote for. No chip on my shoulder either. It's just annoying that every tiny move the guy makes comes under intense scrutiny and frankly this is clearly a damned-if-you-do ... etc. presidency. Even now with the BC released to shut you all up you're not satisfied because now there's something "wrong" with it. Never before have I seen the vultures swarm over a President like they have been doing with this one. He can do absolutely nothing right. And why is this so? My sense of fair play is acutely offended - and that is why entered this thread. Read what you all want into it. But there are more important things going on to constantly bitch about than to see whether Obama wipes with his right or his left hand.


“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

First and foremost, I expect this out of this President and every President.
Second, I've wasted little time worrying about his BC or his citizenship.

Obama, like every other US President, was elected to do a job. He is an employee of We the People. He should focused on doing the Will of the People. I am critical of this policies and actions because they are frequently the polar opposite of my Will.
Unlike many, I saw through the whole Change thing when he was campaigning, so I suppose I could just quietly accept the fact that he is holding true to his Progressive Democratic Socialist agenda that he ran on.......but I can't.

I do commend him for following through with the pursuit of Osama and making the hard decision to have our troops take him out.

Time to get back work.
 
I'm hardly an Obama worshipper. Yes, I consider myself a Democrat, but I didn't even acknowledge the guy until Hillary was no longer there to vote for. No chip on my shoulder either. It's just annoying that every tiny move the guy makes comes under intense scrutiny and frankly this is clearly a damned-if-you-do ... etc. presidency. Even now with the BC released to shut you all up you're not satisfied because now there's something "wrong" with it. Never before have I seen the vultures swarm over a President like they have been doing with this one. He can do absolutely nothing right. And why is this so? My sense of fair play is acutely offended - and that is why entered this thread. Read what you all want into it. But there are more important things going on to constantly bitch about than to see whether Obama wipes with his right or his left hand.


You weren't paying attention to politics from 2000 on were you. "selected not elected" ringing a bell? It happens with every election. People who are the most upset that their person lost look for the quickest and easiest way to claim that it was because the other person cheated or that they didn't really deserve the presidency. With Bush it was the supreme court decision and the recount, with Obama it is the BC.

Stop acting so surprised when the 10-20% of people on the extreme sides of an issue act this way. Learn to rise above the tin foil hat wearing, sherry sipping nut's behavior.
 
It's just annoying that every tiny move the guy makes comes under intense scrutiny and frankly this is clearly a damned-if-you-do ... etc. presidency.

So was the last administration, and the one before that, and so will the next administration. It is my opinion that it all began with ditto heads and Rush's tag line of America held hostage BS. The same folks that would speak out against hollywood types spouting political views being only 'entertainers' and "the media" failed to realize Rush is there for entertainment purposes and is <gasp> part of the media!

It is annoying for both of the 10-15% of the far left and right to keep bringing it up. Bickering solves no problems.
 
We are hoping that by remembering maybe they will learn it is pointless and give it up. However with a large portion of the population ignoring any information it is unlikely. The best way to stir up an un-participating mob is to try to excite them somehow, and that is what they do on both sides.
 
Back
Top