Governor Schwarzenegger on Roadless Areas

Ed A. Stevens

NAXJA Member
NAXJA Member
FYI:


Governor Schwarzenegger Announces that Roadless Areas Will Remain Roadless in California



Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced today that the United States Forest Service (USFS) has agreed that California's forests will remain roadless now and into the future. The Governor's announcement follows the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) adoption of a final rule for the management of inventoried roadless areas.



"California's forests are one of our state's most treasured and valued resources. I am committed to protecting the vibrant health and sustainable future of our forests," said Gov. Schwarzenegger. "In keeping with that commitment and the assurances we have from the U.S. Forest Service, roadless areas in California will remain roadless."



Secretary for Resources Mike Chrisman has led the Schwarzenegger Administration's effort to ensure that California's forests remain protected and that inventoried roadless areas remain roadless. Since October 2004, Secretary Chrisman has been working to obtain a USFS and USDA agreement to develop a rule specific to California. Secretary Chrisman obtained a commitment from the USFS in a letter he received earlier this year. Prior to promulgating a California specific rule, the USFS and USDA have agreed to keep roadless areas roadless.



"In October of last year we said we were interested in having a rule specific to California so that our forests would remain roadless," said Chrisman. "We are thankful that USDA and the USFS have agreed to develop a rule specific to California."



At Secretary Chrisman's request the USFS has agreed to continue to adhere to the following principles for California. These include; inventoried roadless area maps will be updated, roads like those used by Native American Tribes must be preserved, roads not maintained will be decommissioned and in order that California be able to effectively fight wildfires, roadless status limitations will not compromise fire fighting efforts. Unlike wilderness areas, a multitude of activities are allowed in roadless areas so long as new roads are not created for such activities. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) dictates that a specific process must be followed if any new roads or alternative uses are contemplated in roadless areas.



The management of all USFS lands, regardless of designation, is important to the state. Gov. Schwarzenegger believes that states must play a larger role with federal land management agencies to achieve successful resource stewardship. The Resources Agency will work to ensure the quality of wildlife habitat conservation, community safety and broad public support for watershed-based forest management practices.
 
This is not surprising.

If I could tell you about half this weenie's ideas, it would make you puke.

Frankly, and I never thought I'd say this, it's worse than working for Gray Davis.

CRASH - Disgruntled Arnold Voter
 
Ed A. Stevens said:
"California's forests are one of our state's most treasured and valued resources. I am committed to protecting the vibrant health and sustainable future of our forests," said Gov. Schwarzenegger. "In keeping with that commitment and the assurances we have from the U.S. Forest Service, roadless areas in California will remain roadless."

This is what has me worried... Yeah, the areas will remain roadless, but no mention of public access to them has my suspicions up.

Secretary for Resources Mike Chrisman has led the Schwarzenegger Administration's effort to ensure that California's forests remain protected and that inventoried roadless areas remain roadless. Since October 2004, Secretary Chrisman has been working to obtain a USFS and USDA agreement to develop a rule specific to California.

There we go again with that uneasy feeling.

At Secretary Chrisman's request the USFS has agreed to continue to adhere to the following principles for California. These include; inventoried roadless area maps will be updated, roads like those used by Native American Tribes must be preserved, roads not maintained will be decommissioned and in order that California be able to effectively fight wildfires, roadless status limitations will not compromise fire fighting efforts.

Seasickness, I tell you.

Unlike wilderness areas, a multitude of activities are allowed in roadless areas so long as new roads are not created for such activities.

Kinda vague for my tastes.

The Resources Agency will work to ensure the quality of wildlife habitat conservation, community safety and broad public support for watershed-based forest management practices.

Notice there's no mention of access in there... Don't want to sound paranoid, but every time I read something like this it seems like it's BOHICA time.

CRASH said:
This is not surprising.

If I could tell you about half this weenie's ideas, it would make you puke.

Frankly, and I never thought I'd say this, it's worse than working for Gray Davis.

CRASH - Disgruntled Arnold Voter

Amen to that.
 
I'm starting to think it's time for a "Public Lands for Public Use" demonstration at the Capitol.

CRASH
 
There was a good deal of disscussion on this with CORVA at my local club meeting last night.

Did anyone see page A25 of the LA Times on Sunday? I think Truckhaven is going to be a prime place for tresspassing issues, and alot sooner than we think.

--ron
 
I think that's a good idea.

No burnouts on the lawn though!

Sequoia
 
Linky?

I need to discuss this at my club meeting tonight, need more facts!

CRASH

Edit: Found the LAT article.
 
Last edited:
CRASH said:
CRASH - Disgruntled Arnold Voter

You mean you actually voted for this ass hat?!!!

For fawks sake, hes "the terminator" you should have known better. Obviously you've never seen Kindergarten Cop, that alone should disqualify someone from the right to hold ANY public office.
 
sintax said:
You mean you actually voted for this ass hat?!!!

For fawks sake, hes "the terminator" you should have known better. Obviously you've never seen Kindergarten Cop, that alone should disqualify someone from the right to hold ANY public office.

I was blinded by the "R" behind his name.

Now I see he's just another R.I.N.O.

CRASH
 
GSequoia said:
No burnouts on the lawn though!

Dammit, and I was all set to pick out my bitchin' Camaro.
 
sintax said:
You mean you actually voted for this ass hat?!!!

Yeah... Given the choice we had at the time and the need to be realistic about who got my vote, it was very much a painful choice but I did it.

God, we're doomed.
 
casm said:
Yeah... Given the choice we had at the time and the need to be realistic about who got my vote, it was very much a painful choice but I did it.

God, we're doomed.


You said it.

CRASH
 
CRASH said:
You said it.

CRASH

What I love is the fact that last week they had one of those impersonators on the Stern show pretending to be him. Saying how he wanted to blow up the moon to stop women from having PMS issues. The funny part is there were like 10+ reputable news groups who REALLY thought that it was him making these plans, and acutally launched it into the AP wire.

I'm just amused that they feel hes a loose enough cannon to actually say something like that. I just love how everyone hates him now.
 
CRASH said:
I was blinded by the "R" behind his name.

Now I see he's just another R.I.N.O.

CRASH

Tom McClintock's name had an 'R' behind it. :lecture:
 
It's time for some sort of lobby effort to make Arnold wake up to motorized recreation as a revenue source and responsible use of public lands (including motorized trail adoptions to prevent the roadless-rule decommissioning).

You guy's might also mention to your clubs that the CBD is opening an office in 29-Palms (there goes the neighborhood, right next to Johnson Valley). Something to watch with respect to local political issues and influence (look for $$$$ going into local government as a way to direct policy, and make locals aware to solidify their pro-motor connections in local government).
 
I heard the stern show and the one the dat after you believe someone in the news dept took that as really arnold ??lmao but i dont like the fact that there is no public use either in that issue where i live they closed the hills here to public use to preserve the land but driving thrugh the paved roads i see where they flattend out land so I walked up and low and behold they are building housing tracks there preserve the land phewy i think they just want to keep the public out to sell and line there pockets without anyone knowing it
 
Ed A. Stevens said:
It's time for some sort of lobby effort to make Arnold wake up to motorized recreation as a revenue source and responsible use of public lands (including motorized trail adoptions to prevent the roadless-rule decommissioning).

Doesn't CA4WDC and CORVA do this? If not where do my dues go?
 
Ed A. Stevens said:
It's time for some sort of lobby effort to make Arnold wake up to motorized recreation as a revenue source

Especially with gas at $2.50/gal=more sales tax revenue. IIRC a portion of CA fuel taxes also goes to OHV program in California.
 
karstic said:
Tom McClintock's name had an 'R' behind it. :lecture:


I don't know if you recall where old Tom was in the polls at the time, but he was never in contention.

I like Tom, he's great where he is. We need more like him.

However, he's widely despised by the ruling class in Sac-town. As such, he would have been a lame duck from day 1.

On second thought, maybe i prefer a lame duck to a pumped-up one......
 
Back
Top