SteveT said:
1. It's the Kyoto Protocol, not the Kyoto treaty
2. It's sarcasm, not sarcasim
3. It's candidate, not canidate
4. Internal combustion is not hyphenated
5. You state that "the environment would still be ruined in the coming decades. Not by me or you, but the whole planet acting together" and then go on to say "I guess I'm still just part of the problem, just like every one of you."
Just what books are you reading while you're sitting there wasting gas? Try some with fewer pictures, and more BIG words. Maybe a dictionary would be a good start.
When you give attitude, expect to get it back. It seems the general opinion is extended idling is bad. I don't see anyone else taking your side. "We" are not all part of the problem. People who act with selfish interests (Wahh, my toes are cold) are the problem. Move on.
Steve
Thanks. I'll admit spelling is not my forte, thank god for spell check, which I clearly didn’t use on that post.
It is the Kyoto Protocol climate treaty, but it is referred to, in short, as the Kyoto treaty by The BBC, NPR, CNN, FOX, The NY Times, The Washington Post, and many others, to name a few. Protocol would be the protocol the signatories have to follow in order not to violate the treaty they signed. But thanks for the clarification.
So by your logic "When you give attitude, expect to get it back." I get to give it back when someone gives it to me?
I don't really care if anyone else takes my side, I'm not putting a team together. However I'd say a good half of the posts, at the very least were indifferent, and provided a simple answer.
And I agree, people acting with selfish interests, are the problem.
So it seems like about a gallon and half an hour? Thanks for the answer Dr Dyno and XJ Dreamin'.