Yeah - don't forget the Econ guys that think they're taking a serious subject, and the PoliSci guys who think that their degree will be - perhaps - more useful than the family pix hanging next to it.
While DC may have managed to improve NVH with their later mods, some things can only be solved by the use of material (note the increased weight of the later block.) The fact that the later blocks have strengthening webs and "resonance elements" added does not necessarily mean that the cylinders would be able to handle being bored out +.125" - that's something that would have to be first checked, then tested. If I had a sacrificial block I'd try it - especially with the webbing and mains cradle added. If I could get away with it, I'd look into having one-piece mains caps made (might have to do that meself one of these days. Sounds like an investment casting job...)
"An engineer is a man who can do for one dollar what any other man can do for ten." There's nothing wrong with engineering in its pure form - it's when you get accountants and attorneys involved that things get screwy. If product liability would be treated properly, for instance (you misused it, so you don't get anyhing!) we'd see some serious design improvement that was there all along - just that some lawyer suppressed because "someone might sue us." Ditto beancounters - while saving a few cents on a part over a production life of millions might add up, I'd sooner spend the money to turn out something more reliable (but I'm cranky.) "Your job is to keep track of my beans, not tell me what to do with them!"
5-90