old_man
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Loveland, Colorado
Coal, fueling electric cars for over 100 years. 

Hmmm,...
emission-free fuel in a conventional IC engine,...
aren't oxides of Nitrogen a controlled emission from automobiles? Isn't that Nitrogen carried in the air and not the fuel? I wonder how the wonder-fuel controls the formation of,...
...,oh, right,.. Magic.
May as well burn wood, then.
(Anyone else recall the Stanley Steemer?)
Where do these people think all the freaking hydrogen comes from anyway? It's not exactly falling from the sky.
usually that it leaves carbon (probably carbon dioxide depending on the extraction method...) behind, and takes just as much (or more) energy to extract than you get out of it by recombining it with other things. But I suspect you already knew that.It's extracted from natural gas. What's wrong with that picture?
The only thing hydrogen is good for fueling is fusion reactors. So until we get that figured out we're spinning our proverbial wheels worried about hydrogen.
Where do these people think all the freaking hydrogen comes from anyway? It's not exactly falling from the sky.
Personally I think these battery only or fixed hybrids are a mistake, though one of my co-workers mentioned that his new ford fusion has a 300,000mi warranty on the battery pack.
Other than you Rich, how many folks have the patience to go 300k in a single vehicle! I wonder if the biggest problem is how they're going to tax your driving with a fuel or energy purchased at residential cost per kw. With gasoline or diesel, the more you drive, the more taxed fuel you buy. But, the powers that regulate don't know if the kw flowing from that recepticle in the garage is feeding your Volt or an industrial-sized Beer Meister. And, don't forget that often law enforcement agencies have used electric consumption to find Cannibus cultivators using ultraviolet grow lights.
Did not look at the tax angle but that's another valid one for killing self sufficient fuel vehicles. Vehicles that the owner can manufacture their own fuel, either though solar, wind to charge a volt or a surplus electrolytic O2 generator that just happens to produce Hydrogen as a byproduct that submarines have been using for over 60 years.
Did not look at the tax angle but that's another valid one for killing self sufficient fuel vehicles. Vehicles that the owner can manufacture their own fuel, either though solar, wind to charge a volt or a surplus electrolytic O2 generator that just happens to produce Hydrogen as a byproduct that submarines have been using for over 60 years.
I'm still baffled as to why we use ethanol. Maybe just because it's highly subsidized?
The EROI (energy return on investment) is pretty much 1:1, so any gas we're saving, is actually absorbed by the diesel used in the tractors, and equipment in the production of the corn. (or other bio-refuse)
And the fact that we get less mpg, wouldn't that mean more CO2 emissions, thus negating any benefit of using less gasoline?
I'm baffled as to why you're still baffled.I'm still baffled as to why we use ethanol. Maybe just because it's highly subsidized?