BFGoodrich M/T vs. A/T

I can't speak for the bfg's personally, but have seen them on the trail. for wheelin' take the mtrs. they are more exspensive. not too loud, but pretty tough tires. I have 33" at's on one xj and I love them for dd'ing. My mtr's wore pretty quickly (compared to the bfg at's). mtr's don't hold up to smokey burnouts like at's either (in case you were wondering).
 
Rev Den said:
In midwest mud.....BFG.
That's what I deal with.

the_chief said:
mtr's don't hold up to smokey burnouts like at's either (in case you were wondering).
Ummm....my XJ wouldn't hold up to a smokey burnout so thats really not a problem for me.
 
BigBlackHeep said:
Ummm....my XJ wouldn't hold up to a smokey burnout so thats really not a problem for me.

I didn't think mine would either, but a few u-joints, new rear, d/t parts and ponies later, sure enough!
 
I have over 60,000 on my A/T's and they still have another 10K in them.

MT if you are going in mud/clay trails. The AT will do fine in 90% of the conditions you visit but not MUD, they cake up easy and require A LOT of wheelspin to clean.

With that said, if I had it to do again, I would go with the M/T just for sheer self cleaning capacity.
 
hell i got almost 12,000 miles out of my 35x16.5x16 boggers on a 1 ton pickup with a bigblock. You have alignment issues if thats all you can get out of BFG A/T's. My 31x10.5x15 A/T's on my ZR2 have got nearly 35,000 miles and are just now under half tread.
 
Back
Top