DrMoab
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- The Utah Backwater
Not even a close second.

IXNAYXJ said:Subaru Baja. Same reasons as the X-90.
![]()
Close second? Jeep Wrangler Rubicon. Solid axles, dual lockers, 4:1 t-case, Dana 44 axles (well, almost) and 32" MT/Rs out of the box.
-----Matt-----
Yeah but its ugly.ladywolf said:was that meant to be a diss? i love my subie baja. good gas mileage and i have a minibed to haul junk in.
DrMoab said:Yeah but its ugly.
Sorry when it comes to cars utility should be the second factor.
ladywolf said:well, you know what they always say....beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
What, are you trying to get flamed!?!Greenlantern said:
Wow take a joke.Zoro said:What, are you trying to get flamed!?!
If that's your idea of the best SUV ever do us all a favor, go off yourself![]()
Zoro said:2000's-Rubicon
Solid Axles, Lockers, decent sized tires out of the box
1990's-Land Rover Discovery
Solid Axles, Lockers, coil springs, V-8 engine, no low hanging stuff underneath
1980's-S10 Blazer
Yeah it's IFS but posi front&rear, decent flex for what it is, gear ratios from hell, full skids and good power/weight ratio. piss poor departure angle tho1970's-Cherokee Chief
401 V-8, wide track width, long WB, solid axles, available trac-lok, good ground clearance and quadra-trac which is comparable to the 242's seen on XJ's
You know I was kidding, right?Atl XJ said:Wow take a joke.![]()
Realtime AWD > *.*