Im disagreeing with this whole statement.
"Keeping your magazines loaded does not make the spring lose its function." (it can on older guns or cheaper guns, mostly cheaper regardless of age. THrough the years gun manufacturers have recognized this and even changed their recommendations after working with new spring materials on how to keep mags and hammers. It has to do with the material of the spring, all else being equal, more than anything.
" Springs under tension don't lose their tension. Springs are worn out by compressing and decompressing them. " This is also not true, springs do wear out from compression cycles, but WILL also wear out from being, especially fully, compressed, again depending on the spring, material, application. Load your 1/2 ton truck with a ton of weight for a year, and tell me how the springs look when you unload it
This has more to do with the Spring and its use, Im not saying its a concern to keep a mag loaded in a quality piece, I am saying failure from it can and does happen, and to dismiss that is wrong.
I am not wanting to argue, but I dont want folks to think its OKAY in all guns. A "AR" mag, most modern mags from Sig, Glock, ect. all will do nicely likely loaded up for years. (I rotate mine still...cant hurt that is for sure) I would check what the manufacturer recommends if you have a question and follow that, or purchase aftermarket mag that has a spring that is made to be kept loaded. Old shotguns are famous for their springs going flat when left "hammer back", again this was more spring material. This is so hugely debated, lol, I shouldnt of even got involved. lol. Ill quietly listen to the rest.
