corbinafly
"Mmmm. More please."
- Location
- lakewood,ca
No holes, no loose connections. I used a setup very similar to yours. 3" stainless u bend with silicone intake adapters and t-bolt clamps. I have no reason to bash the AEM dryflow filters. The reason I got one was because I thought they were the chit. I was wrong.1bolt said:Well I can respect that, but I've got a hard time not suspecting you had a hole or maybe a loose connection, or some kind of gap somewhere that you didn't detect.
Seriously the Dryflow is basically a paper filter with better flow, it has small pores like paper, but way more of them, and much greater surface area. Looking at them I can't imagine how cotton gauss stops more fine dust than the Dryflow. Unless of course it's getting so loaded up with gunk trapped by the oil that it's become a gigantic air restriction. Which is actually commonplace for oiled filters... they become more efficient at about the same rate as they strangle your intake flow.
I imagine the much larger particles that were injested along with the fresh filter oil early in your run; being much more dangerous to an engine than finer particles. Might be that your oiled filter showed less "fine dust" because the oil is slowly being pulled from the filter, cleaning your intake tube.
My biggest problem with oiled filters is that they "trap" particles that "hit" the oil... particles that don't touch oil just fly right through until the cotton has loaded up so much that the holes are much smaller... at which point you might as well have a paper filter...
If the Airaid was so ineffective, I would have dust inside the tube all the way to the intake like I did with the dryflow. And your theory about the larger particles flowing by with the oil is unlikely since the inside of the tube is dry as a bone from the filter all the way back to the throttle body.
Again. I think the Airaid is far superior to the Dryflow and the K&N. Just my opinion.
Kyung