tornado

MaXJohnson said:
marketing rules the world. Aluminum tubes look cool. They look high tech. They look sexy.
And yet a stainless steel tube would look just as good when polished or powder coated, plus stainless steel just sounds better than aluminum.




5-90 said:
Dammit, if we're all going to use the same words, why can't we use them the same way?
Maybe because there is more than one meaning for a lot of words...
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/decimate
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/billet
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tragedy
 
89Daytona said:

Perhaps, but I know those meanings weren't in dictionaries I used when I was in school, and not that long ago. That means that they were recently added in response to "common usage" - and that the words were misused before they were redefined in response to common misuse.

I know I'm a little odd in that I prefer to use the OED over here - which is already uncommon on this side of the puddle - but this highlights "what is popular is not always right - what is right is not always popular."

Take the word "tragedy" or "tragic" - the common usage definition (any horrific happening or event) came up because newsies have been using it that way for the last 10 years or so. "Billet" has been misused for about the same length of time (and yes, I'm also familiar with the uses/definitions derived from the military - I still call short-stay lodging "billeting,") it's just the marketing people who have screwed this up this time.

I can understand that English is a flexible language - that's why it's the language of aviation, and why it's becoming the language of business and engineering. But, if we've been using a word a certain way for several decades, and we need something new, we're usually able to create a new word from whole cloth (rather than misappropriating an existing word.) That's the part I find annoying - when a word gets redefined through common (mis)usage and doesn't mean what it used to mean anymore, or an ancillary meaning gets tacked on that didn't have anything to do with the word in the first place. Just because it's "common usage" doesn't mean it's correct - probably why I've become so fond of archaics over the years.
 
Have your cake and eat it too....take the offending aluminum component to the coating shop and have it ceramic coated inside and out. Instant thermal barrier.
 
but...the Tornado might not fit anymore...I'd have to buy another one. :(
 
After all the devastation in Kansas City, I don't think that anyone living there would want to buy a Tornado especially when they've just had a big one for free. ;)
 
No but this one actually had a flame.......But condensation would be created by the flame, and the flame was cool to the touch....but it would cut metal. I have no idea or how the hell it does it!
 
CanMan said:
Yea, its called a water jet. I first saw it on OCC on the Discovery channel. Uses super high PSI to cut. Google it, should come up with something.
Water jets use the water pressure to push an abrasive through the metal, the abrasive is what actually does the work.

The water torch is a Brown's Gas product, it converts water into hydrogen and oxygen then uses the gasses to cut/weld. http://www.watertorch.com/whatis/whatis1.html
 
Actually, I found the Tornado to be a fantastic product and did some extensive testing to see just how well it worked.

Here's how I tested it.

Since none of us can see inside the intake manifold, I decided to insert a fiber optic camera, with a built in light, through one of the spare vacuum ports. Taking my time, I worked it down to the number 4 injector. I figured this would be the ultimate place just to see how well turbulated air would work with injected fuel.

After getting that far, I realized I couldn't really see the turbulated air very well, so I devised a method of inducing colored smoke into the TBI. Now this was just dandy and really showed up well in the camera. But then I noticed that I couldn't really see the injected gas vapor because of the colored air.

After spending several weeks trying to solve the problem, I bumped into one of my old CIA buds and we chatted about the issue over a couple of cold ones. As it turned out, he knew of a supply of liquid radon that I could get from the government for next to nothing (seems the government is having a heck of a time disposing of this stuff). Anyway, mixing it with gas would cause a glowing effect inside the manifold when injected and then could be viewed along with the colored air.

The next day I logged onto the government site that I was given and as the good American citizen that I am, used my real name and addy. Two days latter the package arrived.

Now that I had all the kinks worked out for the test, I needed to do a bench mark. The first would be with no Tornado and I would hook up the output of the fiber optic camera to my laptop so that I could record my findings.

I put 2 quarts of Radon in the gas tank then filled her up with regular. Oh, I was also informed in the hazardious material notification that came with the Radon, to not use any gas that contained alcohol. Seems it has a tendency to make the mixure gel.

The smoke to the TBI was set up again as well as the fiber optic camera and I started the engine. I waited a few minutes for the new fuel mixture to get to the engine and turned on the smoke and camera. Wow!! That was unbelivable. Just seeing how the air and gas mixed was a wonder in itself. I recorded about 2 minutes of this happening. I realized for anyone else to follow what was on the computer screen, I would have to slow the process down because it happened so fast, but that would be a project for later.

I shut everything down and followed the manufactures instructions for installing the Tornado. I started everything up again and began recording. Even as fast the mixture process was, I could really see the difference. Instead of being sort of a hazy mixture, this was a very pronounced blending into one color. I was betting it would look super in slow motion.

As it was getting late, I disconnected everything and decided that I would review everything the next morning and write up the documentation with the videos so that I could post this amazing development on the web.

The next morning I awoke to my doorbell ringing and at 6:00AM. I'm not accustomed to visitors that early in the morning and was a bit miffed at the early wake up. No sooner did I unlock the door than 4, 6 foot plus guys came barging into my home and two pinned me to the wall. The other two disappeared into the other rooms of my house. In shock, I didn't even get to open my mouth as one of the guys holding me started reading me my rights.

Finally, I'm hollaring what's going on and I'm being told to shut up while they are dragging me out to their unmarked car. Every time I go to ask something, I'm told to shut up and only that we are headed to the Federal building downtown.

Damn, I shaking from anger, anxiety and worry. This is crazy. Finally we get to the Federal building and here I am only in sweats, no shirt, no shoes trucking accross the building entrance. We get inside, I pushed through a metal detector, my two escorts each have an arm and we head to the elevator. Up we go to the 24th floor.

To cut to the chase, seems the Radon I purchsed alerted homeland security who thinks I'm a terriorist. All my computer gear, camera gear, vehicle and anything to do with my experiment was confiscated and I'm sitting in a detention center. This is my only link to the outside world.

I really want to appologize to everyone for not being able to provide absolute proof that the Tornado really does work but, what the hell, there are worse things in life.
 
rstarch345 said:
Actually, I found the Tornado to be a fantastic product and did some extensive testing to see just how well it worked.

To cut to the chase, seems the Radon I purchsed alerted homeland security who thinks I'm a terriorist. All my computer gear, camera gear, vehicle and anything to do with my experiment was confiscated and I'm sitting in a detention center. This is my only link to the outside world.

I really want to appologize to everyone for not being able to provide absolute proof that the Tornado really does work but, what the hell, there are worse things in life.

I admire your determination to test the Tornado and you can thank Georgie Bush's "Patriot Act" for being detained (yeah that sucks), but did you really have to go to all that trouble when several independent tests of the Tornado have already yielded a horsepower gain of exactly ZERO?
 
Ok I have bought a tornado for my first jeep and it is a WASTE OF MONEY and 5 minutes of time it took to install it.
I found myself going to the gas station the same amount I was going before I bought it. And hp gain...HAHA!
 
j99xj said:
the boy scout that made a nuclear device out several hundred smoke detector parts.....

it could happen :yelclap:
 
Dr. Dyno said:
I admire your determination to test the Tornado and you can thank Georgie Bush's "Patriot Act" for being detained (yeah that sucks), but did you really have to go to all that trouble when several independent tests of the Tornado have already yielded a horsepower gain of exactly ZERO?
If anything I would think that the tornado lowers hp for impeding airflow, and I was under the impression that the story wasn't real? Seeing as Radon becomes a gas at ~ -80F it must have been fun "pouring" it into the gas tank. But anyways, i like the story. :roll:
 
My previous post was indeed fiction. For any of you that feel offended or upset that my post was fiction, I apologize.

The intent was to show that allusion to truth, even when fiction, still appears to be truth. For that has been the marketing strategy of the Tornado.

I made the effort to put in clues that the cautious reader would find untruthful and would come to the conclusion the I was “full of it”.

Those of you that spotted the inaccurate or questionable clues I included, I congratulate you. The three primary clues was the CIA friend, the Radon in liquid form and the fact that I was able to have a computer in detention.

The only reason I posted this was because I had too much time available. I’ve been on jury call this week and have been spending too much wasted time at the court house. As usual when a bunch of guys get together, we started talking vehicles and eventually the conversation got to the Tornado.

As the conversation went on, I commented that it wasn’t too difficult to write fictitious truth and I was essentially “dared” to do it.

So, I did it and you saw it.

Again, I apologize for any offense taken.
 
rstarch345 said:
My previous post was indeed fiction. For any of you that feel offended or upset that my post was fiction, I apologize.

The intent was to show that allusion to truth, even when fiction, still appears to be truth. For that has been the marketing strategy of the Tornado.

I made the effort to put in clues that the cautious reader would find untruthful and would come to the conclusion the I was “full of it”.

Those of you that spotted the inaccurate or questionable clues I included, I congratulate you. The three primary clues was the CIA friend, the Radon in liquid form and the fact that I was able to have a computer in detention.

The only reason I posted this was because I had too much time available. I’ve been on jury call this week and have been spending too much wasted time at the court house. As usual when a bunch of guys get together, we started talking vehicles and eventually the conversation got to the Tornado.

As the conversation went on, I commented that it wasn’t too difficult to write fictitious truth and I was essentially “dared” to do it.

So, I did it and you saw it.

Again, I apologize for any offense taken.
I thought it was pretty good, ive got nothing to do here at work for the most part other than browse naxja and read good stories.
 
Back
Top