fscrig75 said:
Sorry I can't by off on the UN idea. The whole idea of the UN in the begining was a nice idea but it just doesn't work. Almost every place the UN has been involved in has gone to sh*t. They failed in Bosnia, Kosovo, Somalia, Dafur and don't forget there is a small war going on right now in Georgia.
I am doing some reading on this, as some of these I don't know a whole lot about, just wasn't able to pay much attention to them at the time, but it appears that it was NATO, not the UN that was involved directly in Bosnia and Kosovo. Granted, NATO had UN approval, but it was NATO that tried to create and enforce a peace in Kosovo according to this.
Also I think we expect too much from the UN, while we are busy, and have been busy trying to shut down the UN. The far right wing republic party has been trying to get rid of the UN since at least the early 1960s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeping
A few quotes from there:
"As of October 2004, there have been
59 UN peacekeeping operations since 1948, with sixteen operations ongoing."
"On 20 December 1995, under a UN mandate, a NATO-led force (
IFOR) entered
Bosnia in order to implement The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In a similar manner, a NATO operation (
KFOR) continues in the Serbian province of
Kosovo. The NATO-led mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina has since been replaced by a
European Union peacekeeping mission,
EUFOR."
"Since 1948, close to 130 nations have contributed military and civilian police personnel to peace operations. While detailed records of all personnel who have served in peacekeeping missions since 1948 are not available, it is estimated that up to one million soldiers, police officers and civilians have served under the UN flag in the last 56 years. As of March 2008, 113 countries were contributing a total 88,862 military observers, police, and troops"
Here is an eye opener!
"Despite the large number of contributors, the greatest burden continues to be borne by a core group of developing countries. The 10 main troop-contributing countries to UN peacekeeping operations as of March 2007 were
Pakistan (10,173),
Bangladesh (9,675),
India (9,471),
Nepal (3,626),
Jordan (3,564),
Uruguay (2,583),
Italy (2,539),
Ghana,
Nigeria and
France"
Seems to me it is NATOs failure in Bosnia and Kosovo, and I suspect most of the slaughter in those four examples happened before the UN and NATO got directly involved and got authorization to take actions and put peace keepers on the ground. It also sounds like Bosnia and Kosovo were not traditional peace keeping force operations, but they were what they refer to as peace "making" operations, which is something new for the UN.
What the UN does seem to have been good at is policing a cease fire with non-combatant, non-beligerant, peace keepers so that a permanent peace could be negoatiated between the waring factions.
One thing I do see today, is a difference between peace keeper requirements for two waring countries with a border that peace keepers can patrol, and a civil war, where the entire country is collapsing or has collapsed into civil war internally. We need a different kind of UN ready to deploy force for civil wars to stop them early in their tracks, if that is even possible. We would also need a UN policy for fixing the politics in a civil war torn country that all the major and minor powers would agree to and abide by, including our own CIA!
Anyway, I think we need to start reintroducing the UN into Iraq, and slowly replace our troops with UN troops partly from the arab countries that are willing to help keep the peace there long enough for the Iraqis to come to a political solution to their own problems. Perhaps that is too idealistic, but it has taken those kinds of idealistic attitudes to get us where we are today.
Ghandi, Martin Luther King, and President Carter who brokered the peace treaty between Israel and Egypt which has endured to this very day, are and were dreamers too, but they succeded!