flexy92xj said:
Had a failure on my upper wishbone link... should have extended the gusseting down to the bushing when I first built the arm... sleeved, welded and more gusseting and its good to go.
Just posting for group benefit...
side loads on the wishbone are what I think caused the failure.
http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2076205130032428117pATWjn
I disagree yet agree, depending on how you ment this...
As Rockkrawler found out through many broken rear TJ wishbones on thier rear "tri-link" system back some yrs ago...
On the design/setup like you had/have and the very similiar RK setup, the wishbone has such loads also being applied by the unibody rails as well as the rotational torque and the side loads of the axle housing.
Meaning.. The wishbone is acting as a Very solid crossmember that is trying to siffen the rails, and if you know how flexable a XJ can be in the area of the chassis where you have the body side mounts of the wishbone at, you know then how much flex that wishbone is trying to prevent.
Thats with also the axle forces, I would say you ran in to the same exact issues RK did. The wish bone acted like a paper clip, it was flexed one way then another just one to many times, no matter how small it (the flexing) was...
I will say it prolly lasted double what it would have if you used Hiems at the body end at least. The poly was able to deflect some and give to some of the squeezing and pulling apart forces of the chassis.
If you stay with this design I Highly recommend a cross member located right at your body end of the wishbone mounts. This is prohibit the chassis flex from distroying another wishbone or link ends..
Just IMO.... But givin that I personally was a RK failier customer 2 times with thier wishbone and with over a dozen hiems in about 3 months, I have some experience in this.