18-20" on a straight axle front end? Might have a little bump steer and your oil pan would be non existent.
I should of made my post more clear. I didn't mean or claim a XJ pulling that much travel. Should of made that clear. :cheers:
When I said just because we are straight axle it shouldn't matter..I mean to say just because we are straight axle doesn't mean we shouldn't link the rear??? Say you jump your truck...your rear
should touch down first. So more rear travel = helpful! As far as going over whoops & such, sure you probably won't use all the travel but its there for when you do use it!
Yes I agree more front travel would be great but you can only go so far before BS comes into. I'm aware & already know of this! Does this mean extra rear travel isn't helpful? HELL NO!!
Don't get me wrong, it would get tons of street cred but you can only polish a turd so much.
As for the polishing a turd comment. Maybe your hearts not into like others are. I agree you can grab a ranger throw 5000 down & have a nice capable prerunner, but whats the fun in that? The uniqueness of a baddass jeep that can hold its own it sick! You know this because you've built a sick ass jeep! Unibodys can be strengthened. Plating & cages go a long way! Especially when your not out beating it every weekend.
J: sorry if it sounds like I'm being a dick, thats just how I wrote it lol! Didn't mean to come off like that.
Im gonna guess you have never ridden in a linked truck before. The only trucks I have seen with 30"+ of travel are trophy trucks. Also properly valved shocks will help you go alot faster than more travel will. And to much travel can actually make you go slower if you don't have the horse power to back it up
Yes having a solid front axle does make it different. Why do you think the guys who link there jeeps either put beams on them or want to put beams on them
We all know about properly valving shocks in here....I think just about everyone in here is building/have build or have a jeep thats being used as a prerunner/desert truck or what have you!! But since you know so much on that matter, please tell me something...Why would use be straight axle matter? All that means to me is less front travel! The rear travel will still be useable, sure maybe it won't be all the time but it will be useable!
And to make it clear no ones chasing travel numbers in here. We are inquiring about spring under since a few JS have been built that way in the past! If you have no experience with it and cannot contribute to better the thread, then please have a nice day!
And no I'm never been in a linked truck before. But I can bring up 2 expos & countless rangers that have been purpose built & are still daily drivers, that are pulling 24"+ of rear travel...Full on trophy trucks?? They are far from it!! Next time I post I'll make sure to post exact numbers for you though!
I'm sure with a simple search you could find plenty of trucks that aren't trophy trucks pulling rear travel like that!
Oh and these 4.0's with the right gears will have more than enough
Torque to keep you moving! Torque would of been the right word since horse power is a derivative of torque! No need for more "power" to have more travel, sure it'll help you go faster but it isn't needed! Thats absurd, but I know what you ment! You can go plenty fast with the power available.
More travel isn't going to slow you down either, if you think it is please explain it to me!
I'm aware that 10-12" in the front is about it without going crazy and yes bumpsteer comes into play! That still doesn't give me a definitive reason why spring under in the rear is a bad idea or shouldn't be done! And X-over steering setups will help eliminate some BS! I see no reason a XJ with 12" of travel up front shouldn't be SU in the rear!
This is a far cry and obivously will never happen or be proved, but I'm willing to bet if you have 2
equal jeep XJ's, with the
only variance being one is SO & one is SU. I'm willing to bet the SU would be faster!