- Location
- Wasatch Range
Holding a public office and representing the constituents in your district/State is a privilege and should not be a career that makes you eligible for retirement pay. Career politicians are a pox on our Republic.
Holding a public office and representing the constituents in your district/State is a privilege and should not be a career that makes you eligible for retirement pay. Career politicians are a pox on our Republic.
Holding a public office and representing the constituents in your district/State is a privilege and should not be a career that makes you eligible for retirement pay. Career politicians are a pox on our Republic.
your right, but excuse me If I dont feel sorry for the politician getting over 100k a year from his pensionGot something to disprove it?
http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30631.pdf
There are many more crediible references.
Members of Congress do get a little more in the way of their contribution percentage, but it's still the same plan(s) as any other civil service employee. You might be surprised just how much the average Congressional retiree gets.
You should consider yourself lucky, obamacare will pay for your rehab whenever you burn out on whatever your smoking if you truly think it is "free"..and for the record, Gov't health care is AWESOME! I consider myself VERY lucky for having free health care for life!
Something positive about Obama...
He pulled nearly ALL of our troops out of that farse of a war in Iraq. Put them in Afghanistan where they can finish the job that was started over 9 years ago.
He managed to follow the previous administration's draw-down schedule for Iraq, and things seem to be getting worse in Afghanistan.
...and for the record, Gov't health care is AWESOME! I consider myself VERY lucky for having free health care for life!
Until the dollar collapses and you see the horror of the deathpanels unfold... good luck staying well and of some use to the "collective".
deathpanels lol. Tell me, how will Obama administer these deathpanels? Will he come down the chimney - like Santa - to kidnap our loved ones? Perhaps he'll dawn some Judge Dredd garb, and kill our kinfolk using his instant field judiciary powers? Maybe, he'll just subcontract the work to the easter bunny and the tooth fairy? Than again, his plan could involve klingons or an imperial death star.... anything's plausible when deathpanels are concerned.
Ironically enough, the people spreading the fear now are touting the current government as the reincarnation of the Nazi party. I find this funny as these people are using the same tactics, propaganda, methodology, and basis of fears as Goebbels prayed on to unite Germans under the Nazi flag.
NAZI propaganda was mired in fear-based governance. If you stick around here long enough and you'll notice certain people enjoy associating Obama's policies with communist sentiments to drum up fear. It's comedic gold IMO.
"Deathpanels" is sensational terminology commonly substituted for the very real health care rationing, which will certainly intensify
in times of economic crisis, emergency, shortage, etc... here's a couple of references if you don't understand the concept...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_rationing_in_the_United_States
http://www.nrlc.org/press_releases_new/Release062209.html
As for the Bush administration's having worked out a time line for withdrawing troops from Iraq, here's a couple of dated references...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/21/AR2008082100310_pf.html
http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/947
I didn't like George Bush. I don't like Barrack Obama. I trust no politicians (regardless of party) or the mainstream media (including FOX,
though they seem to be presenting a little more truth than the others). I'm only hoping that the tea party can make some amount of
difference, but then that remains to be seen while being given adequate opportunity. Obama's had about two years now, and... (oh well)
"Deathpanels" is sensational terminology commonly substituted for the very real health care rationing, which will certainly intensify
in times of economic crisis, emergency, shortage, etc... here's a couple of references if you don't understand the concept...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_rationing_in_the_United_States
http://www.nrlc.org/press_releases_new/Release062209.html
Yes, Bush did state he was going to agree with a withdrawal from Iraq by 2011. This came in an agreement dated August 21st, 2008. Did you stop to think that this agreement maybe has something to do with the quickly approaching 2008 elections, and late 2011 doesn't have anything to do with the NEXT presidential elections? It was purely a political ploy to get some of the anti-war swing voters in the GOP's camp.As for the Bush administration's having worked out a time line for withdrawing troops from Iraq, here's a couple of dated references...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/21/AR2008082100310_pf.html
http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/947
You say you trust no politicians, yet you cite sources that are the puppets of current political powers, and run by former members of those parties. I don't trust any of them either, and I certainly didn't appreciate Bush and his push for a war in Iraq. I feel Obama has done a great job thus far trying to clean up the mess that the Bush admin had made for the previous 8 years. Let's also not forget that when Obama took office, he gave the ball to Congress, to fix the hole in this sinking boat. If they were unable to do so in one year, he would step in and start using executive powers to do it the way he sees fit. Well, the internal fighting in Congress went nowhere in a year, so Obama took the reigns, just as he said he would do. So, in reality, Obama has only had a year to patch the hole. Sadly, there is so much separation in the population, and the worthless whores in DC, that nobody really cares about what is good for the entire nation. I see Obama doing what he sees as proper to help out us all, despite the arrogance and ignorance of his nation.I didn't like George Bush. I don't like Barrack Obama. I trust no politicians (regardless of party) or the mainstream media (including FOX,
though they seem to be presenting a little more truth than the others). I'm only hoping that the tea party can make some amount of
difference, but then that remains to be seen while being given adequate opportunity. Obama's had about two years now, and... (oh well)
The term you are all really looking for is called triage, it is what is done when resources are limited and has been practiced for hundreds of years. Triage is what will be done by accountants that run the new health care system the same way it is done in England now.
As far as the tea party groups are concerned, the problem is that when you have to walk around the cesspool that is Washington DC with feces all over the place you get it on your boots no matter how hard you try to stay clean. Politician sleeze balls that can't make headway in the dem or rep party are now flocking to the the Tea people in hopes of getting ahead there. I got involved with my local group after the protest in DC that I went to, within 6 months we had the slime balls moving in on the people who started it and hijacking it which is what has happened in many places. In many cases lawyers are the curse of this country and most of them are politicians.
Essentially correct - "triage" is what is done to maximise the use of limited resources (particularly in times of disaster or conflict) or used to prioritise treatment of trauma (although just how those priorities are assigned can differ according to the guidelines of treatment. Battlefield triage, for instance, often works backwards from disaster area triage.)
However, a series of triage decisions are still to be made by a medical practitioner of some variety, not a beancounter. Triage is a medical decision, not an accounting decision. When the decisionmaking process is moved from medical to accounting, the result is going to be something akin to rationing (preserving resources, instead of preserving life.)
Kinda how accountants get involved in engineering decisions, and we all end up with substandard parts in critical applications...
so the politicians are the ones who care? Amazing
I trust my doctor to make a decision more than some gov. accountant
Sadly this is done today in the current US health care system. It is evidenced in the inability for some with "existing conditions" being unable to get medical coverage. Don't think for one minute that the MD's making these decisions in the private industry actually care about patients, they are glorified bean counters in a corner office, far from the operating room.