LOL okay please hear me out for a sec. Anyone who thinks wildcards are the answer should probably Try:
*TPS*
in titles only
Do you REALLY think that the abbreviation TPS has only appeared in a thread title TWICE in the entire history of
? Of course not, Wildcards are only going to return instances where someone has added another character before or after the word. The asterisk in a wildcard means "any character"
So *TPS* works... If you are happy with two search results where someone happened to spell it "TPS's" and "TPSes" this is how wild cards work. Try *CPS* or CPS*. You get three hits (all "CPS's") that's not a very useful work around at all.
I agree that wildcards are one tiny pseudo-useful kludge you can use to try to get around the 4 character search limitation. But lets not pretend that it's actually providing even a small portion of the potentially relevant search results.
Two hits for throttle position sensor? I bet there are 2000 threads with TPS in the title... and lots of those threads will contain useful info that may or may not exist in threads that actually have "throttle position sensor" spelled out. The few instances where ANYONE on
is going to spell that out instead of using the abbreviation that 99.9% of us use.
How many of us say Dana 44? Or Aisin Warner 4? next to none right?
Seriously what possible gain is to be had by arbitrarily limiting to 4 characters? 10 years ago when forum bandwidth was expensive maybe there was a reason... Now its just needless...
*TPS*
in titles only
Do you REALLY think that the abbreviation TPS has only appeared in a thread title TWICE in the entire history of

So *TPS* works... If you are happy with two search results where someone happened to spell it "TPS's" and "TPSes" this is how wild cards work. Try *CPS* or CPS*. You get three hits (all "CPS's") that's not a very useful work around at all.
I agree that wildcards are one tiny pseudo-useful kludge you can use to try to get around the 4 character search limitation. But lets not pretend that it's actually providing even a small portion of the potentially relevant search results.
Two hits for throttle position sensor? I bet there are 2000 threads with TPS in the title... and lots of those threads will contain useful info that may or may not exist in threads that actually have "throttle position sensor" spelled out. The few instances where ANYONE on

How many of us say Dana 44? Or Aisin Warner 4? next to none right?
Seriously what possible gain is to be had by arbitrarily limiting to 4 characters? 10 years ago when forum bandwidth was expensive maybe there was a reason... Now its just needless...
Last edited: