New stuff.

camarors8992

NAXJA Forum User
The exhaust tip, it's welded on, not clamped. That's the hanger you see there.

100_2314.jpg


100_2316.jpg


and I bought this too, I need to find a way to mount it.

100_2319.jpg
 
I mounted my airtube with a standard L bracket designed for shelves or bracing. Its just mild steel and ain't too pretty, but on my unit, its fine. I bent one end over and bolted it to the underside of the tube, and the leg of the L I bolted to the fenderwell. Works perfectly. In your case, since things are a little prettier, I might throw a shot of spraypaint on it first. On the other hand, its hidden pretty well...
 
he means that the intake should be routed over to the cooler side of the engine.

I've never understood what makes people replace an OEM air box that
sucks cold air from the front of the jeep with a pipe and a cone filter that sucks extremely hot exhaust manifold heat...

That cone filter is probably sucking somewhere over 100 degrees hotter air than the factory box... On a stock 4.0 that's a 15 horse power LOSS. Without acounting for the improved "flow" of the cotton gauss filter (with it's dubious filtration capacity).
 
If it would be THAT much more beneficial to put it on the passenger side then why do the after market companies place them on the drivers side as well ?
 
Got a better picture ? I was looking at everything over there, and is there even room for it ? Also, would the engine block heat the filter with it being less than a foot away ? Wouldn't a heat shield keep the filter cool ? I had plans on making one, then coating it with a undercoating to keep heat transfer down.
 
camarors8992 said:
If it would be THAT much more beneficial to put it on the passenger side then why do the after market companies place them on the drivers side as well ?
A couple very good reasons, they need the consumer to be able to bolt it in with a couple worm clamps and a screw or two. Anything they make that requires moving stuff like dip stick tubes, Washer fluid res's etc. is sure to be returned by most guys. And makes it much more expensive to engineer.

Most makers know their intake is sub optimal, but they can't fit it inside the factory air box without sawing stuff up, and moving it over to the cooler side STILL sucks engine bay heat. Many also provide a "heat shield" which has minimal effect and is mostly a plecebo to make you think it's drawing cooler air. It still draws hot air around the loose fitted shield.

The best of those do restrict engine heat by sealing to the hood and tightly to the sheet metal, which allows the filter to draw air through the small square opening that the factory box plugs into.

A few companies (Volant and Banks best among them) both engineer Air boxes. Banks uses CAD and a really trick solid modeling instant prototyping CNC machine to carve out working plastic prototypes on the fly...

Most however know you will never dyno their tube, and that you may get a few HP as the gain from a high flow filter washes out the loss from sucking hot engine bay air... It should be said though; even a better flowing filter is not going to wash out the loss from sucking the air off of header! that air will not only be well over 200 degrees, but it will fluctuate wildly spiking up hundreds of degrees, which may even cause your ECU to dance around trying to compensate for sudden rich and lean conditions.

The best home brew solution is a cowl induction hood and an air box sealed to the opening like this one (full write up is in the mods forum):
ourpicsusa038ri8.jpg


This breaths air that is barely above ambient temps (2 to 6 degrees warmer than the outside air) which I can probably get down to 1 to 2 by sealing it a little better, and insulating the tube itself.

10 degrees is roughly 1% loss or gain in horse power, without the shield and the cowl opening this intake averaged about 60 degrees hotter than ambient at sustained highway speeds, it was worse at slower speeds where the hot air wasn't being drawn out of the engine bay.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top